Wood question

The Chiff & Fipple Irish Flute on-line community. Sideblown for your protection.
User avatar
Ann
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:37 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: So Cal
Contact:

Wood question

Post by Ann »

I apologise if this question has been asked before. I can't get the search function to work so its hard to check.

Has anyone here have an opinion on the advantages or disadvantages of the different kinds of wood for flutes. I'm thinking of upgrading to a better flute, and was wondering about wood choices. I won't go for cocus, because it looks like that tree might be endangered. But there still is african blackwood, boxwood and mopane. Has anyone compared flutes of these three woods, and if so can you tell me what the differences are?

Thanks.
User avatar
lingpupa
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:15 pm
antispam: No

Re: Wood question

Post by lingpupa »

There are greater experts than me here, but since I'm the first here I'll offer you the little I know.
1: Cocus was endangered (I don't know about whether this was ever "official") as it became so scarce some time ago, but is being cultivated responsibly again, so afaik you don't need to worry about it.

The biggest difference to, say, African blackwood is a) that cocus is rather more allergenic (hence the popularity of metal lip plates on older flutes) and b) I have heard that blackwood has an even finer grain. The difference lies in the workability, and is of more interest to flute makers than to players. Since the material, assuming it is reasonably good, has only at best a marginal effect on the sound, it is a non-issue when set beside design and workmanship.

I do believe that boxwood takes more maintenance, in particular more attention to oiling. Afaik it's advantage is that some people prefer the look of it.

But I bow to the greater experts who will follow me....
User avatar
crookedtune
Posts: 4255
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:02 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Raleigh, NC / Cape Cod, MA

Re: Wood question

Post by crookedtune »

Some people think wood choice contributes a lot to the sound. The makers don't seem to feel as strongly about that. Boxwood is maybe a bit more prone to warping. Scan the threads, and you'll read all kinds of opinions.
Charlie Gravel

“I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.”
― Oscar Wilde
jim stone
Posts: 17192
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm

Re: Wood question

Post by jim stone »

unless you have something special in mind, Blackwood is great stuff, tough, lovely sound, not endangered and readily available. Boxwood is very sweet sounding but less readily available and somewhat harder to care for. There seem to be some difficulties in getting mopane, and it isn't clear how it really compares acoustically with Blackwood. But it does appear to be very tough. If you search on the names of these woods, you'll find a lot of info.

We may be able to be more helpful if you have an idea of the sort of flute you want and the maker if you have some idea of whom that might be. meanwhile you can't go wrong with blackwood.
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: Wood question

Post by Denny »

The search has been a bit of a bane to many. :D

Here is the first post, in the Flute Forum, that had these words (blackwood boxwood mopane).
There is a nice post by David Migoya.

Pure-toned flutes

The thread was prior to delrin flutes :twisted:
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Ann
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:37 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: So Cal
Contact:

Re: Wood question

Post by Ann »

Thanks for all your replys. And thanks Dennys for the link to a previous post. I'm at work. These computers are so safe and secure that the search function doesn't work on them, so I couldn't look that up. It is a lot to think about. I was sort of considering boxwood, but it is said that it is succeptable to moisture. Is there anyway around that, like more frequent oilings?
jim stone
Posts: 17192
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm

Re: Wood question

Post by jim stone »

Boxwood is less dense than blackwood, lighter, less resistant to moisture, more inclined to warp.
But it's still a good wood for flutes, with reasonable care. I have two boxwood flutes
and never had any trouble. The very popular Casey Burns folk flute is made of boxwood.
If you talk to the maker about care and follow instructions,
you will be OK. If I wanted boxwood I wouldn't let this stop me.
User avatar
Casey Burns
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:27 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Kingston WA
Contact:

Re: Wood question

Post by Casey Burns »

(Jim, the Folk Flute is made in all 3 woods! Blackwood is the most popular.)

Mopane and Blackwood are very similar acoustically and are quite stable. Mopane has a slightly "warmer" tone. Both produce good volume.

Boxwood is warmer than the above two, but requires more input for the same volume.

Mopane and Blackwood warp less but can crack more. Boxwood will warp before it cracks.

All 3 are available if one knows where to look. Most of the Mopane I get is somewhat wet at 14% and requires additional seasoning. I've put up enough for several years of flute making as it is my favorite flute wood for many reasons. The boxwood is also somewhat wet when I get it - but is stabilized in the microwave which also dries it. Its hard to get nice clear pieces however. I am about out of the long dried French boxwood that was cut in 1980. The blackwood I have been using is dry at 8% and ready to use off the shelf.

Casey
jim stone
Posts: 17192
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm

Re: Wood question

Post by jim stone »

Thanks for the correction. I actually knew the FF is made in all three woods,
however I've seen a number lately in boxwood and that sort is on my mind.
I'm in a session-class and the fellow next to me is playing a boxwood FF
and it sounds very good. (drool, slobber)
User avatar
s1m0n
Posts: 10069
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: The Inside Passage

Re: Wood question

Post by s1m0n »

jim stone wrote:Blackwood is great stuff.... If you search on the names of these woods, you'll find a lot of info.
There are several blackwoods; I believe the one you want is African Blackwood, Dalbergia melanoxylon.
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')

C.S. Lewis
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7707
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Re: Wood question

Post by chas »

Ann wrote:. . .I was sort of considering boxwood, but it is said that it is succeptable to moisture. Is there anyway around that, like more frequent oilings?
I have many boxwood flutes and prefer it over other woods, in small part because it is "susceptible to moisture." For some reason, I seem to play wet (probably inefficient use of air). So I get condensation on the blow-edge and in the head joint. This is way less of a problem with boxwood than with blackwood or mopane.

The added care for boxwood is not anything I wouldn't do for any flute, but then that's just me.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
jim stone
Posts: 17192
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm

Re: Wood question

Post by jim stone »

I really would like a boxwood flute in D.
I have one in G (a bleazey) and one in C (one of Casey's).
I love the sound of boxwood.
User avatar
m31
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:21 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: ...next door to the Milky Way...

Re: Wood question

Post by m31 »

Recently we had a thread about flute reviews. Reviews are considered unreliable if the reviewer's embouchure is underdeveloped.

Subsequently we had a thread about head liners, which suggested that their contribution to the flute's tone or playability are minimal at best. The ability to detect any real differences is also subject to the adeptness of the user's embouchure.

Then there was my thread about flute perfection. Perfection is unrealistic of course, given that flutes are handcrafted. There is limited repeatability in the manufacturing process which is why all well-made flutes undergo "final voicing". We all accept that small adjustments to the embouchure and tone holes can have a dramatic impact on playability and tone.

Now we are on to wood, which incidentally we rarely mention specific species, grain or cut, moisture content, age, treatment, surface roughness, porosity, etc. I'm no wood expert but this is far from a homogeneous material. Nonetheless we again attribute tonal differences to different woods despite the aforementioned pitfalls.

(We've also had several threads about flute designs / bore profiles / rudall vs pratten but let's wait for that one to come up again on its own. :twisted: )
Last edited by m31 on Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mutepointe
Posts: 8151
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:16 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: kanawha county, west virginia
Contact:

Re: Wood question

Post by mutepointe »

Nope, no one here has ever had an opinion on anything. Keep moving.
Rose tint my world. Keep me safe from my trouble and pain.
白飞梦
User avatar
m31
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:21 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: ...next door to the Milky Way...

Re: Wood question

Post by m31 »

mutepointe wrote:Nope, no one here has ever had an opinion on anything. Keep moving.
Cheap eBay flutes r0ck.
Post Reply