Integral

Post by **Dale** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:08 pm

in-TED-ral

or

IN-tegral

?

emmline · Post by **emmline** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:11 pm

The second one. But I think you meant G, not D, in the first.

jsluder · Post by **jsluder** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:16 pm

Been watching the TED Talks, Dale?

CHasR · Post by **CHasR** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:16 pm

contextual, imo.

If nessecary for validation, #1,
If nessecary for operation, #2.

jsluder · Post by **jsluder** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:18 pm

CHasR wrote:contextual, imo.

Not for me. It's always IN-tegral. YMMV.

cowtime · Post by **cowtime** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:19 pm

jsluder wrote:
CHasR wrote:contextual, imo.
Not for me. It's always IN-tegral. YMMV.

yep

peeplj · Post by **peeplj** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:26 pm

CHasR wrote:contextual, imo.

If nessecary for validation, #1,
If nessecary for operation, #2.

Ditto.

--James

CHasR · Post by **CHasR** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:28 pm

well then!

I'll just go be inTEGral elsewhere!

HDSarah · Post by **HDSarah** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:38 pm

And I thought this would be a thread about calculus . . .

Another vote for IN-teg-ral.

Cork · Post by **Cork** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:59 pm

Yes, IN-teg-ral is about calculus, and in-TEG-ral is about integrity, although eventually perhaps there could be some common ground to all of that.

Post by **Dale** » Sun May 10, 2009 9:46 pm

emmline wrote:The second one. But I think you meant G, not D, in the first.

O myelin sheaths. How I miss you.

MTGuru · Post by **MTGuru** » Sun May 10, 2009 9:53 pm

Dale wrote:O myelin sheaths. How I miss you.

I had a set of myelin sheaths. But they were too itchy without pajamas.

Denny · Post by **Denny** » Sun May 10, 2009 10:00 pm

this is getting just too embarrassing!

BigDavy · Post by **BigDavy** » Mon May 11, 2009 3:00 am

Inte-Gral for me.

David

Innocent Bystander · Post by **Innocent Bystander** » Mon May 11, 2009 4:43 am

Us-uns way over in Yurpistan sez INT-egral.

Chiff and Fipple Forums