Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- falkbeer
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:52 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
I suggest switching to the metric system all together!Tyler wrote:I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
The SI-system is superior in every aspect, and is used in most countries and in science.
The future is bright - let´s buy shades!
http://www.sibeliusmusic.com/cgi-bin/wh ... usclassics
http://www.sibeliusmusic.com/cgi-bin/wh ... usclassics
- Anstapa
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Yoworigende
This morning. Three of us librarians are sitting at the adult reference desk, it is 9:15 AM (we open at nine), this dude comes up and aks if the library is open....Yes it is we answered (we kind of look a round at each other...roll our eyes) ...unitl five this afternoon. Him "What time do you close?" Five! So the library is open all day today?" YES!
Anstapa
Anstapa
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film
- Innocent Bystander
- Posts: 6816
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 12:51 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth (UK)
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
Of course it is!Tyler wrote:I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
And if something is three feet long I don't say it's 36 inches (unless I'm taking personal measurements).
It's a lot easier to say someone is ten stone than say they are 140 pounds. It's very much easier to say someone is twelve stone than say they're one hundred AND sixty eight pounds.
And my Mother used to send me down the road to get half a stone of potatoes. Much easier than saying seven pounds.
Next you'll be telling us it's "more sensible" to write the date with the month first, then the day of the month and then the year. Get a grip!
Wizard needs whiskey, badly!
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
Y'know, I learned and used the metric system while l lived in Canada, and never really gave it up except for those neccesary things that are still standard in the us (mph, etc). Whenever i construct anything out of wood, i always measure in metric units. It just comes easier.falkbeer wrote:I suggest switching to the metric system all together!Tyler wrote:I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
The SI-system is superior in every aspect, and is used in most countries and in science.
edited to fix sumfink....
Last edited by Tyler on Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- emmline
- Posts: 11859
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Annapolis, MD
- Contact:
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
Right. Perfectly understandable. It is only NOT easier for us yanks who don't really have a feel for what a stone is.Innocent Bystander wrote:Tyler wrote:I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
It's a lot easier to say someone is ten stone than say they are 140 pounds. It's very much easier to say someone is twelve stone than say they're one hundred AND sixty eight pounds.
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Hell yeah! An I'm cheap too; just buy a few beers an' I'm all set!!Denny wrote:it's good to be easy, innit!
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- rorybbellows
- Posts: 3195
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:50 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: the cutting edge
-
- Posts: 15580
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
But the United States' system is used by the most socio-economically powerful country the world has ever seen, so that's why it's still in use despite the metric system being more efficient and used over a wider geographical area. In exporting American culture, this one aspect is just a tiny bit that, for whatever reason(s), seems not to have taken hold (Myanmar and Liberia apparently don't use the metric system, either, for what it's worth).falkbeer wrote:I suggest switching to the metric system all together!Tyler wrote:I'll start:
Why do you folks on the other side of the pond use 'stone' to describe a measure of 14 lbs?
is it really easier to say something weighed 70 stone instead of 980lbs?
The SI-system is superior in every aspect, and is used in most countries and in science.
My question:
- Innocent Bystander
- Posts: 6816
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 12:51 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth (UK)
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
Eh?Cranberry wrote: My question:
Speak up!
Ah, wait! "The really stupid question is the one that didn't get asked."
Last edited by Innocent Bystander on Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wizard needs whiskey, badly!
- s1m0n
- Posts: 10069
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: The Inside Passage
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
That's interesting. I'm a native born canadian, the generation that started getting preperatory metric indictrination starting in about grade three prior to the switchover. And whenever *I* construct something out of wood or paper, I use inches.Tyler wrote:Whenever i construct anything out of wood, i always measure in metric units.
I can eyeball six & a half inches, or 7/8ths of an inch in a way that I never could in metric.
Weather temperatures is even more mixed up: I understand celsuis for winter temps ("three degrees below zero" tells you info that "27 degrees F" doesn't), but summer temps and inviting household and pool temperatures are all fahrenheit.
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
- jlunt
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:18 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Questions you thought were too stupid to ask
Of course, the U.S. also chose VHS over Beta. So we don't always make the smart choice.falkbeer wrote:I suggest switching to the metric system all together!
The SI-system is superior in every aspect, and is used in most countries and in science.
- MTGuru
- Posts: 18663
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:45 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: San Diego, CA
http://www.marshallhall.org/hanson.htmlrorybbellows wrote:Who was the first president of America?
Vivat diabolus in musica! MTGuru's (old) GG Clips / Blackbird Clips
Joel Barish: Is there any risk of brain damage?
Dr. Mierzwiak: Well, technically speaking, the procedure is brain damage.
Joel Barish: Is there any risk of brain damage?
Dr. Mierzwiak: Well, technically speaking, the procedure is brain damage.