To me the main difference between these two cases is that the grizzly man seemed to be a bungling amateur with a distorted view of what wild animals were all about, who was lucky to stay alive as long as he did. In contrast Steve Irwin, even though a risk taker, was much more of a professional. Had he ended up being killed by a crocodile, I would have been very, very surprised.Loren wrote:Reminds me of all too many mountaineers who've left families behind. Reminds me of Dan Osman, and that guy who loved the bears (no, not the football team), and then got eaten by them, although the latter didn't have any kids, as far as I can recall, just a girlfriend who got eaten along with him.
His death sounds much more like a freak accident than as a consequence of any extreme risk-taking (how dangerous is diving in the Great Barrier Reef generally considered to be anyway?).
But I agree - he leaves behind two small kids, and that is by far the most tragic part of this affair.