Daytime television and the human brain.
- Walden
- Chiffmaster General
- Posts: 11030
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Coal mining country in the Eastern Oklahoma hills.
- Contact:
Daytime television and the human brain.
"New research suggests that elderly women who watch daytime soap operas and talk shows are more likely to suffer from cognitive impairment than women who abstain from such fare.
"Researchers stress that it's not clear if watching these TV shows leads to weaker brainpower, or vice-versa."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20060320/hl ... gingbrains
"Researchers stress that it's not clear if watching these TV shows leads to weaker brainpower, or vice-versa."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20060320/hl ... gingbrains
Reasonable person
Walden
Walden
- emmline
- Posts: 11859
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Annapolis, MD
- Contact:
I only have to catch a couple minutes of those shows before I can feel the IQ points dropping away like sweat in a sauna. I have the same reaction to supermarket tabloids.
I'm glad someone did this study.
There's a great book called Aging with Grace by David Snowdon, which summarizes the results of an ongoing study of nuns of The School Sisters of Notre Dame. They make excellent study subjects as they they live similarly, with the same access to healthcare.
The differences tend to be things like choice of occupation, pursuit of ongoing learning opportunities, etc.
Fascinating book, really, if the subject interests you.
I'm glad someone did this study.
There's a great book called Aging with Grace by David Snowdon, which summarizes the results of an ongoing study of nuns of The School Sisters of Notre Dame. They make excellent study subjects as they they live similarly, with the same access to healthcare.
The differences tend to be things like choice of occupation, pursuit of ongoing learning opportunities, etc.
Fascinating book, really, if the subject interests you.
- missy
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
- Contact:
Are these the Notre Dame de Namur nuns? There are actually two different groups of Notre Dame nuns.emmline wrote:
There's a great book called Aging with Grace by David Snowdon, which summarizes the results of an ongoing study of nuns of The School Sisters of Notre Dame. They make excellent study subjects as they they live similarly, with the same access to healthcare.
The differences tend to be things like choice of occupation, pursuit of ongoing learning opportunities, etc.
Fascinating book, really, if the subject interests you.
Anyway, I went to Mt. Notre Dame High School, which is next to the motherhouse (and retirement home). A lot of the older nuns still taught in the high school. In MOST cases, they should have been over at the mother house watching soap operas - they were WAY past their prime for teaching!!!!
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Hey, wait a minute, what about men!!?? I only watch one hour of General Hosppbbllblbbbddlbblpbbdslsbpppp.
Bhhahhbbfhbab
blhalh.
ffjkdfs.
::slobber::
EEEEEGHHhh!
Blbabhlabhlabhlabhlabhlab!
Blibbidyblabba!
EEEEK!
hummanuhhummanuhhummanuh!
Bhhahhbbfhbab
blhalh.
ffjkdfs.
::slobber::
EEEEEGHHhh!
Blbabhlabhlabhlabhlabhlab!
Blibbidyblabba!
EEEEK!
hummanuhhummanuhhummanuh!
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- Congratulations
- Posts: 4215
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Charleston, SC
- Contact:
It's been done. (Language is not safe for work or small children. It's Penny Arcade, what do you want?)emmline wrote:I'm waiting for the study on internet usage and dementia.
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
I think the Crystal People will block any serious attempt at that...emmline wrote:I'm waiting for the study on internet usage and dementia.
It's part of their main plan, don't you know?
It all has something to do with conversion of human brain waves into a form of extraterrestrial locomotion and @^%^&NHGG+_ {>"#:>>>: >/////////////edit.refer-to.transmit*************************
<<<<GO ABOUT YOUR INTERNET USE AS NORMAL. THERE IS NOTHING TO FEAR HERE. ALL HAS BEEN SANITISED FOR YOUR SAFETY. THE INTERNET IS GOOD FOR YOU. BILL GATES LOVES YOU. SALVATION MAY BE HAD THROUGH THE INTEL CORPORATION. COMPUTER GOOD, BOOKS BAD. MSN INTERNET EXPLORER IS NOT INVASIVE, QUITE THE OPPOSITE; IT IS GOOD FOR YOU. DALEKS ARE YOUR FRIENDS. GENERAL MOTORS BUILDS GOOD CARS. YOU CAN TRUST RICHARD NIXON. SPACE EXPLORATION IS A WASTE OF TIME. MARIJUANA AND ALCOHOL MIX WELL. THERE IS NO LIFE ON OTHER PLANETS, ESPECIALLY OURS. TED DANSON AND TONY DANZA ARE GOOD ACTORS. TELEVISION WILL NOT ROTT YOUR BRAIN. SUGAR IS GOOD FOR YOUR TEETH. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAD RAVINGS OF THE WACHOWSKI BROTHERS OR THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN. VEGETABLES AND GRAINS, MOST ESPECIALLY WHOLE GRAINS, ARE VERY BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH. CHOOSE FRIED FOODS. LITE BEER IS DANGEROUS. COKE AND PEPSI ARE THE SAME THING. A SEDENTARY LIFE IS A HAPPY LIFE.
BE HAPPY AND PROFITABLE SERVANTS.
THANK YOU.
WE NOW RETURN YOU TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED THREAD.
END TRANSMISSION>>>>
#&*($^*#&%^*)(*)(*$#)*)#$
*******************message end***************************
woah....
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- SteveK
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: London, Ontario
It's obviously a correlational study and the authors point out that no inference can be drawn about cause and effect. I think the author of the article wants to imply that watching those programs leads to some deficit rather than that people with the deficit watch those programs more often. Notice these statements:
"One researcher who has studied the effects of television watching on children said the study suggests that, "viewing television in a way that reduces active mental engagement may lead to poorer cognitive outcomes in older people."
Frederick Zimmerman, director of the University of Washington's Child Health Institute, added that the findings are significant because the apparent effects of television watching are quite striking. He said he's also found evidence that excessive television watching hurts kids' academic and cognitive development."
Zimmerman concludes that there is an "apparant effect" in the absence of any data that suggests that there is. I would be interested in knowing if his own research is also correlational.
It makes it more interesting if we can blame TV for the impairment rather than blame impairment for watching TV or blame some other variable for both.
"One researcher who has studied the effects of television watching on children said the study suggests that, "viewing television in a way that reduces active mental engagement may lead to poorer cognitive outcomes in older people."
Frederick Zimmerman, director of the University of Washington's Child Health Institute, added that the findings are significant because the apparent effects of television watching are quite striking. He said he's also found evidence that excessive television watching hurts kids' academic and cognitive development."
Zimmerman concludes that there is an "apparant effect" in the absence of any data that suggests that there is. I would be interested in knowing if his own research is also correlational.
It makes it more interesting if we can blame TV for the impairment rather than blame impairment for watching TV or blame some other variable for both.
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Reminds me of a scene from an episode of The Simpsons...djm wrote:I usually watch a max of one hour tv per day but then fall asleep. I would like to feel smug and superior that the programming is not sufficient to keep my intellectual interest, but the reality is that reading also makes me fall asleep.
djm
"Lisa's Rival" wrote: Lisa confronts her demons and goes over to Alison's house.
Alison: It's great of you to come over, Lisa. I really want us to be
friends.
Lisa: You're a wonderful person.
Taylor: Hi, Lisa, I'm Alison's father, Professor Taylor. I've heard
great things about you.
Lisa: Oh, really? I --
Taylor: Oh, don't be modest. I'm glad we have someone who can join us
in our anagram game.
Alison: We take proper names and rearrange the letters to form a
description of that person.
Taylor: Like, er...oh, I don't know, uh...Alec Guinness.
Alison: [thinks] Genuine class.
Taylor: Ho ho, very good. All right, Lisa, um...Jeremy Irons.
Lisa: [looks with consternation] Jeremy's...iron.
Taylor: Mm hmm, well that's...very good...for a first try. You know
what? I have a ball. [pulls one from his pocket] Perhaps you'd
like to bounce it?
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
- Flyingcursor
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
- Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"
I loved that episode. Right up there with the Canyonero advertisement.Tyler Morris wrote:Reminds me of a scene from an episode of The Simpsons...djm wrote:I usually watch a max of one hour tv per day but then fall asleep. I would like to feel smug and superior that the programming is not sufficient to keep my intellectual interest, but the reality is that reading also makes me fall asleep.
djm"Lisa's Rival" wrote: Lisa confronts her demons and goes over to Alison's house.
Alison: It's great of you to come over, Lisa. I really want us to be
friends.
Lisa: You're a wonderful person.
Taylor: Hi, Lisa, I'm Alison's father, Professor Taylor. I've heard
great things about you.
Lisa: Oh, really? I --
Taylor: Oh, don't be modest. I'm glad we have someone who can join us
in our anagram game.
Alison: We take proper names and rearrange the letters to form a
description of that person.
Taylor: Like, er...oh, I don't know, uh...Alec Guinness.
Alison: [thinks] Genuine class.
Taylor: Ho ho, very good. All right, Lisa, um...Jeremy Irons.
Lisa: [looks with consternation] Jeremy's...iron.
Taylor: Mm hmm, well that's...very good...for a first try. You know
what? I have a ball. [pulls one from his pocket] Perhaps you'd
like to bounce it?
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
I watch HOUSE on tuesdays when it's actually showing (and not being preempted by stupid &*(%&$6 american idol), but that's about it. I do admit that I watch a lot of DVDs but hey, at least there aren't a bunch of brain-rotting COMMERCIALS. I think it's the commercials that make you stupid, myself, especially the ambulance chaser attorneys and those awful car dealership ads that scream at you.
<i>The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts. They alter the facts to fit their views. Which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.</i>