Lump sum?

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

:lol: I still think you would have trouble spending 124 million at one go. Even on the finest flutes. But I guess you never know!
Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. ~ Diligence is a very great help even to a mediocre intelligence.----Seneca
User avatar
Congratulations
Posts: 4215
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Charleston, SC
Contact:

Post by Congratulations »

Wombat wrote:That said, I guess you wouldn't have much problem getting a loan.
Now that is a dastardly thought.
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Post by Wombat »

Congratulations wrote:
Wombat wrote:That said, I guess you wouldn't have much problem getting a loan.
Now that is a dastardly thought.
Why thank you. I do my best.
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

Cynth wrote:You would get a payment every year of 6.5 million after taxes for 30 years? That totals around 60 million more than 124 million. Can that be right? That is half again as much.
Cynth, the way most lotteries work is that when you choose "lump sum" you actually only get about half of the jackpot. When you choose "yearly payments" they take that same half, and buy an annuity, and that's what pays you. You could do the same with your lump sum payment if you want. The anuity pays out interest every year, and a portion of the capital. It's timed so that after 30 years, everything's paid out and there is no money left.

Even a mediocre money manager should be able to do more with that money than the interest generated by an anuity, plus, after 30 years, it won't be all gone.
User avatar
amar
Posts: 4857
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by amar »

Cranberry wrote:
Cynth wrote:
Congratulations wrote:I would do installments or else I'd spend it all in one go.
But what could you buy that costs that much? Some beautiful house on the Riviera couldn't cost that much, could it?
Spending money does not have to mean buying things. You can spend money on helping hungry children in China eat and HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa get the basic medical care they need.
party-time, remember?
Image
Image
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7707
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Re: Lump sum?

Post by chas »

DaleWisely wrote:The cash option is $177.3 million, or $124.1 million after taxes
That's 125,000 Olwells (88,600 after taxes)!
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
Congratulations
Posts: 4215
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Charleston, SC
Contact:

Re: Lump sum?

Post by Congratulations »

chas wrote:
DaleWisely wrote:The cash option is $177.3 million, or $124.1 million after taxes
That's 125,000 Olwells (88,600 after taxes)!
That might be enough flutes.
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
User avatar
Joseph E. Smith
Posts: 13780
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
antispam: No
Location: ... who cares?...
Contact:

Post by Joseph E. Smith »

Dale, the winning ticket was purchased in Nebraska.... when were you last in Nebraska?
Image
User avatar
Paul Reid
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Markham, Ontario Canada
Contact:

Post by Paul Reid »

Lump it... or leave it.
PR

c[]|________||___o__o__O___o__O__º__º__||_]
      \\
User avatar
Montana
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 1:48 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: It's obvious

Post by Montana »

I would say go with the yearly payments but not necessarily for investment reasons. The other thing that you'll have to deal with besides these pesky decisions is millions of people begging you for some of your money. Happens to every mega-winner. You'll barely have the check in your hand before people will be tugging at your sleeve. So many will give you the excuse that they've had to struggle along with just a Gen for so long and if they could just have enough to buy a Copeland.

So if you take yearly installments, you can probably come up with enough excuses for spending $6.5 mil that you can escape the begging. If you take lump sum, no one will believe that you could spend that much...
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

amar wrote:
Cranberry wrote:
Cynth wrote: But what could you buy that costs that much? Some beautiful house on the Riviera couldn't cost that much, could it?
Spending money does not have to mean buying things. You can spend money on helping hungry children in China eat and HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa get the basic medical care they need.
party-time, remember?
Amar. First of all you don't want to give starving people money. They might spend it on food. Give them beer. Lots of beer. Then you know they'll be happy. Or in your case, single malt whisky.


Cran, If I'm going to be a philanthropist than this is the path I'd take:

1. Immediate family
2. Extended family and friends.
3. Local neighborhood.
4. Local city/town etc.
5. State
6. Country
7. Rest of world.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
Craig Stuntz
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:58 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

Re: Lump sum?

Post by Craig Stuntz »

chas wrote:
DaleWisely wrote:The cash option is $177.3 million, or $124.1 million after taxes
That's 125,000 Olwells (88,600 after taxes)!
Remember to factor in interest accumulation and inflation during the waiting period to receive the flutes! ;)
User avatar
missy
Posts: 5833
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by missy »

all I can say is:

Dale!! We're related!!!!! :D
Missy

"When facts are few, experts are many"

http://www.strothers.com
User avatar
Congratulations
Posts: 4215
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Charleston, SC
Contact:

Post by Congratulations »

Flyingcursor wrote:Cran, If I'm going to be a philanthropist than this is the path I'd take:

1. Me
2. Immediate family
3. Extended family and friends.
4. Local neighborhood.
5. Local city/town etc.
6. State
7. Country
8. Rest of world.
Fixed. :wink:

Really, is it so bad to want some (or most) of the hypothetical money for myself?
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

Joseph E. Smith wrote:Dale, the winning ticket was purchased in Nebraska.... when were you last in Nebraska?
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3676644.html
When was the last time he worked in a meat packing plant? :)
Post Reply