Here's why you'll never hear me saying that Phil is "the best Flute maker that rarely gets mentioned here."Unseen122 wrote:Why not? Phil has been making Flutes for about 20 years, that is why I think he is underrated as a maker. So when someone asks for a Flute in the $500-$700 range, why does it seem that I am the only one mentioning Phil?GaryKelly wrote: The Bleazey was my first wooden flute. There is no way you'll hear me saying Phil Bleazey is "the best Flute maker that rarely gets mentioned here."
The Bleazey is, as I said before, 'rustic'.
For a start, the ring on the foot joint is screwed onto the wood and is agriculturally larger than the wood it's fitted to. It's held on with epoxy resin. A week after I bought mine, it dropped off. "Just glue it back on" was the advice I received when I 'phoned him.
The bore has a great spiral reamer mark running practically its length. It was out of tune, a fact I didn't appreciate until I played with other musicians and discovered no amount of fannying with the extremely loose tuning-slide would bring it into tune.
The tuning-slide was loose enough so that enthusiastic playing made the headjoint move out of the playing position.
The cork lapping consists of a strip of automotive gasket material approximatley 1mm thick (if that) cut into a strip and glued to the tenon by rubber contact adhesive. They both split, in spite of greasing every time before assembling. They split six times in the course of a year before I sent the flute back to Phil for servicing...
Now, during the 'service', Phil did a lot of work on the flute. He "touched up the embouchure hole", replaced the cork lapping, brought the flute in tune by working on the tone-holes and undercutting them (apparently, he only recently - last year- developed a tool for undercutting his tone-holes), replaced the headjoint cork and set it in 'the correct position' (I hadn't touched the old one, which was apparently 3mm out of position).
He tightened up the loose tuning-slide by roughing up the brass inner tube and applying grease.
He didn't touch the bore, the swirly tool-marks are plain as day to see. But for £38 for the service, what d'you expect?
Now, as I said, the Bleazey is a good affordable wooden flute, and it was my first. I still have it. I still give it air from time to time, and I know someone who'll enjoy it when she's old enough and her arms are long enough to move off a Tipple G and onto a D flute.
Some people may find it to be the only flute they'll ever need. I'm not one of them.
It's a good first wooden flute for someone who can't afford anything better. But it isn't "the best" by any stretch of the imagination. I'm sure yours is wonderful. Since it's at least a year later than mine, you probably have undercut tone-holes, since Phil made the tool to do that early last year (they're very small tone-holes, as you know, particularly the E).
Here's another reason why I don't think Phil Bleazey is "the best Flute maker that rarely gets mentioned here": I have a Grinter.
I also have an Allan, which cost me a mere £140 more than the Bleazey. The difference in quality and craftsmanship between the Allan and the Bleazey is, quite simply, phenomenal, like comparing a cruise liner to a liberty ship. I know which one I'd prefer to be on when crossing the Atlantic. But you have to wait for an Allan to come along.
Generally speaking, the only folks who recommend a certain flute are those who own them, and as you rightly pointed out, not many people on the board own them. Although from time to time you'll see people saying something like "I've never played one, but the Patrick Kintastic flute gets good reviews around here..." as if that's supposed to mean anything to a prospective purchaser.Unseen122 wrote:So when someone asks for a Flute in the $500-$700 range, why does it seem that I am the only one mentioning Phil?
There's also a body of opinion that suggests it is unwise to purchase a wooden flute not seasoned and made in one's own climate, but that's a debate for another thread.