Looking for a new computer mouse
- peeplj
- Posts: 9029
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
- Contact:
Looking for a new computer mouse
Hey guys & gals, thought I'd see if anyone had any thoughts on this one:
I have had a Logitech MX-700 mouse for a few years and it's been a good mouse, but lately I've realized I want a mouse that's physically a bit bigger. I use the MX-700 with my fingers; my hand sits above it and not on it.
I want something I can actually comfortably rest my hand on.
More buttons is better.
Optical is good; laser is better.
Cordless is a plus but I could live without it for the right mouse.
Thoughts?
--James
I have had a Logitech MX-700 mouse for a few years and it's been a good mouse, but lately I've realized I want a mouse that's physically a bit bigger. I use the MX-700 with my fingers; my hand sits above it and not on it.
I want something I can actually comfortably rest my hand on.
More buttons is better.
Optical is good; laser is better.
Cordless is a plus but I could live without it for the right mouse.
Thoughts?
--James
- Congratulations
- Posts: 4215
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Charleston, SC
- Contact:
I have used a mouse almost exactly like this one for several years now, and I recommend it heartily.
I'm using a different mouse now, as I got a nice keyboard/mouse set for christmas with a charging station for the mouse and what not. You can look at that one (or something close, they have a lot of similar models) here.
I'm using a different mouse now, as I got a nice keyboard/mouse set for christmas with a charging station for the mouse and what not. You can look at that one (or something close, they have a lot of similar models) here.
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
- scottielvr
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: NC mountains
Might want to have a look at this, just for the heck of it ...
http://www.evoluent.com/
A different thing altogether...looks very radical; but once you get used to it, very comfortable. Puts the hand, and more important, the wrist and elbow, in a "handshake" position. Four buttons, scroll wheel, optical. I've been using one for a while now and it's great; wouldn't go back to a standard mouse. An added benefit: Friends and family won't mess with your computer--the mouse will intimidate them.
http://www.evoluent.com/
A different thing altogether...looks very radical; but once you get used to it, very comfortable. Puts the hand, and more important, the wrist and elbow, in a "handshake" position. Four buttons, scroll wheel, optical. I've been using one for a while now and it's great; wouldn't go back to a standard mouse. An added benefit: Friends and family won't mess with your computer--the mouse will intimidate them.
- Joseph E. Smith
- Posts: 13780
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: ... who cares?...
- Contact:
This baby looks cool....
I found it at this joint. And if you're feeling a little on the wild side you could give this one a go.
I found it at this joint. And if you're feeling a little on the wild side you could give this one a go.
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:52 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've been a member of the forum for several years. Just poking my head to catch up on all the latest happenings, as well as checking out the FS/WTB page.
- Location: Florida
Re: Looking for a new computer mouse
If you are looking for a mouse, I find that it is always better to set a trap. People say that peanut butter and cheese work the best, but I find that a simple RAM chip gets the job done.peeplj wrote:Hey guys & gals, thought I'd see if anyone had any thoughts on this one:
I have had a Logitech MX-700 mouse for a few years and it's been a good mouse, but lately I've realized I want a mouse that's physically a bit bigger. I use the MX-700 with my fingers; my hand sits above it and not on it.
I want something I can actually comfortably rest my hand on.
More buttons is better.
Optical is good; laser is better.
Cordless is a plus but I could live without it for the right mouse.
Thoughts?
--James
I've stayed [somewhat] in the past. I use an uncordless Logitech optical mouse, and have never ran into any problems.
It all depends on the mouse pad. (Get one they won't chew up!)
Hehe...looking around...your mouse model # is MX700...my monitor model # is MX70.
- Mitch
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:58 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Wombatistan
- Contact:
I've always seen mouses as an essentially evil thing - they are designed as a commercial convenience at the expense of the operator - much as is the qwertyuiop keyboard.
My brother in law had the privelige to work whith a chap called Stellarc who takes the understanding of cybernetic interfaces way beyond. Have a look
http://www.stelarc.va.com.au/
It always amazes me that humans put up with such plodding uptake of technology. It seems everything must be kept in some religeous sync with that agonising slo-mo evolutionary step from utter darkness to a glimmer of light.
Mouses wreck your muscles and spine, it's not the shape of them, it's their entire paradigm. A sensible interface would take account of what human anatomy is and work-in more intuative kinesic ways to get the job done - if done correctly, it could also address the current epidemic of obesity. I like the PS2 I-toy - that's a step in the right direction (using 20 year old technology).
My brother in law had the privelige to work whith a chap called Stellarc who takes the understanding of cybernetic interfaces way beyond. Have a look
http://www.stelarc.va.com.au/
It always amazes me that humans put up with such plodding uptake of technology. It seems everything must be kept in some religeous sync with that agonising slo-mo evolutionary step from utter darkness to a glimmer of light.
Mouses wreck your muscles and spine, it's not the shape of them, it's their entire paradigm. A sensible interface would take account of what human anatomy is and work-in more intuative kinesic ways to get the job done - if done correctly, it could also address the current epidemic of obesity. I like the PS2 I-toy - that's a step in the right direction (using 20 year old technology).
- Jerry Freeman
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Now playing in Northeastern Connecticut
- Contact:
- Mitch
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:58 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Wombatistan
- Contact:
Heh. Well Stellarc's stompin', cybernetic spider thingy is a new one. Not quite a mouseJerry Freeman wrote:Mouse?
Jerry
The work my Bro in law was working on was a musical interface where Stellarc could interact in real-time to music - the pre-set music worked his body via muscle actuators and he had sensors to feed-back muscle signals to play the music. So he became both the player and the music, so to speak. It was rigged-up to the internet at one time via a net-cam and a website buttons so viewers could join-in and twaek his muscles around and play notes in real-time remotely.
These interfaces avoided using mouses. Not quite ready for the public though
Interesting man.
- Flyingcursor
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
- Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"