another little web puzzle game

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
Post Reply
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

another little web puzzle game

Post by Wanderer »

This one's great...kind of reminds me of certain types of IQ tests

My highest score so far is 949
http://www.gieson.com/Library/projects/games/matter/

The submit high score and play again buttons don't seem to work for me, but it's easy enough to play again by clicking the refresh button.
User avatar
Congratulations
Posts: 4215
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:05 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Charleston, SC
Contact:

Post by Congratulations »

919
oh Lana Turner we love you get up
User avatar
fyffer
Posts: 1032
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:27 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Contact:

Post by fyffer »

The first one took me forever, but then I put my brain back on:

Got 1026!

EDIT: Played again, got 1064!
(I need to go home ...)
___\|/______________________________
|___O____|_O_O_o_|_o_O__O__|_O__O__|
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

Sorry. Timers freak me. Like the computer GED. Did good on verbal. Did good on math. Had a panic attack on the analytical because of the timer.
User avatar
Paul Reid
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Markham, Ontario Canada
Contact:

Post by Paul Reid »

1041 :D
PR

c[]|________||___o__o__O___o__O__º__º__||_]
      \\
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

1141 :)

There are a number of groupings that are common..the more you play, the faster you get at recognizing them
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

That was fun. I can't remember my score but it wasn't in the 1000's :lol: . I just ignored the timer---they make me nervous too, although this one would just keep going forever, it doesn't ding or anything. It was so hard that I just decided to see if I could do them at all.

I felt that the model on the first one I had was not quite the same as the thing I made that was considered correct----I don't think you could really make the model. Did anyone else notice this? It kind of goofed me up because I kept rejecting things that were actually right. I could be nuts too.

The other strange thing is that it said I was in the "Top 20". Well, every score here is higher than mine. That's 4. Then there's the whole rest of the world. How could I be in the top 20? My score was something like 750 or so.
Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. ~ Diligence is a very great help even to a mediocre intelligence.----Seneca
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

Am I missing something? Aren't you supposed to be able to rotate the pieces?

What about overlapping? Is that allowed?


oops. Never mind. I get it.
Last edited by Flyingcursor on Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

No. I went back and did it again. You don't need to, and can't, turn or overlap them. They'll work as is.
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Doug_Tipple »

I don't take tests like this anymore, but not for the same reason that I no longer go to operas. I taught high school mathematics for several years, and I am fairly good at spatial orientation. Timed tests, however, make me feel stupid and anxious, like I need to take a few more of my St. John's Wort capsules. I don't want to know that my test result is 426, below average but to keep trying.
User avatar
Matt_Paris
Posts: 417
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 5:31 am

Post by Matt_Paris »

1175... But Wanderer is quite right :)
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

Doug_Tipple wrote:Timed tests, however, make me feel stupid and anxious, like I need to take a few more of my St. John's Wort capsules. I don't want to know that my test result is 426, below average but to keep trying.
Thanks Doug. You're speaking for me. Though I've no doubt you'd complete these puzzles more quickly than I.

I realized, based on my GED mathematical score, that though I'd completed less than 2/3 of the test when the time was about up and I had to quickly answer "C" (an arbitrary choice) for the remaining questions, I'd at least gotten them all right.
T'ain't a bad thing to be able to do it right, even if you've got a slow dinosaur of a processor.
Post Reply