TomB wrote:GaryKelly wrote:So our fuel costs more than double yours because we don't have a decent public transport system and our country is smaller than yours?
Who'd have thought!
No, you are missing my point, actually. It's the U.S. that doesn't have a decent public transportation system. I simply meant that it seems to me that you have to rely on your cars a whole lot less than we do, that's all.
I'm not saying that here in the U.S. we are not spoiled and waste to much fuel. I'm simply saying that a Country the size of the U.S., if gas costs $7.00 or $8.00 a gallon, the strife and poverty that would cause here would be beyond compare.
I didn't mean that you should pay that much $$. Don't you think that type of cost is crazy????
Tom
What's public transport got to do with it? Ours is crap, actually, and it's more expensive to get a bus from one town to another than it is to drive, actually.
We have to rely on our cars less than you do? Oh, my goodness! What in the world? is that about??
If you mean by that we'll walk a few hundred yards to the local shops for a pint of milk rather than drive our lazy fat arses to the mall and then drive around for an hour waiting for a parking-space to appear right next to the doors (rather than parking 20 yards away and having to
walk to those doors) then granted, perhaps you're right.
But if you work 30 miles away from your home and there's no public transport (or it takes you two hours and three changes of bus and costs more than owning a car if there *is* public transport) then 8 bucks a gallon for petrol I would suggest causes as much feckin pecuniary hardship here as 3 bucks a gallon does for you lot there, if not more, actually.
Why do you think food is so expensive over here compared to the lardass-all-you-can-eat-for-10-bucks you get? Because our "food miles" cost a bloody sight more than yours ever will for one thing.
Oh it really breaks the cockles of my heart to hear you might have to pay £1.50 a gallon for petrol. :roll: