brianholton wrote:... I'm not going near pure Gaelic place names.
They're actually not too hard to get close enough for horseshoes - if you know the general rules, which are dependably consistent. Unlike a certain language we could mention ...
chas wrote:I think of Chicago when I think of a midwest accent.
Yep. But even Midwest accents can be varied and even distinctive if you have an ear: For me, the Chicago accent is Midwestern, but manspreading.
chas wrote:Every so often I do come across someone with a rural Minnesota accent, which I only recognize because of Garrison Keillor.
It's easy to stereotype the Minnesota accent because certain of its elements are so pervasive. The rural areas are where it can be at its thickest, and it has a lot in common with the accent of Michigan's Upper Peninsula, which might at least partly be explained by similarly high Nordic populations, particularly Finns.
Ole-and-Lena jokes are pretty common in the upper Midwest, but Minnesota and the U.P. are probably the only places where you're going to hear Eino-and-Toivo jokes.
One of the most outstandingly thick Minnesota accents I've heard was so utterly different from anything I'd ever heard before that out of context, I might never have thought it was Minnesotan at all. It was from an elderly gentleman whose vowels were predictably toward the far end of the Minnesota-standard spectrum, but it was his diction that stole the limelight: rather than the usual easy lilt, his speech was rapid-fire and very choppy, chewed with the front of his mouth. You don't have an accent like that without getting it from a similarly-speaking community. He was of Finnish extraction himself, and I happened upon him in a diner not far from a town named - what are the odds? - Finland.
Naturally, the bigger the city, the less "Minnesotan" we sound. Or at least that's by Minnesota standards, anyway.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician