C# is flat?

A forum about Uilleann (Irish) pipes and the surly people who play them.
User avatar
bobkeenan
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:44 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

C# is flat?

Post by bobkeenan »

I was trying to make my own version of "Now Westlin' Winds" . It has a lot lower octave C#'s in it. I had noticed with some other tunes that the C# seemed a bit flat but it did not sound so bad. But with the sequence of notes for this tune it sounds too flat.

I don't spend a lot of time using a tuner as long as stuff sounds good to me ear. I am not good enough to play in a session yet.

But I pulled the tuner out and tried two of my pipemaker reeds and about 8 of my reeds. Low D fine. High D fine. Low A good. Low C# off on all of them by about 25-30c flat.

So what do you do about that?? Any fingering to sharpen a the C#?

I suppose that I could sharpen the whole chanter and tape or rush the other notes but that seems dumb?

Can my pipemaker easily correct that one hole?
geoff wooff
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:12 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: centre France

Re: C# is flat?

Post by geoff wooff »

The C# hole also controls the C naturals ( I say that in plural because there are several variants of fingerings which produce slightly different pitches of the C note).....
so anyway it would be good if you also measured the pitches of your C nautrals.

It is possible to have the C# sharper than you have and have the C naturals in good places but it is not just a case of getting the reed 'right' , there are some chanter issues that need to be tackled too. So perhaps it is a job for your pipemaker.

One of the first keys to be put on chanters was the one that gives a better C#... in fact I have seen a very old chanter which had just this key only...showing that there does exist a difficulty in this area which needs some delicate solutions... or a key!

A C# note in the key of D would want to be different to a C# in the key of A... so some compromise is generally taken and many pipers try to avoid C#'s or 'gloss over' them because they are in sour places , in a tone height sense that is.
User avatar
bobkeenan
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:44 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: C# is flat?

Post by bobkeenan »

Thanks Geoff. While my back D sounded good it was sharp as well...but sounded ok. I used some tape to bring it down to where it should be. It did nothing for the C# of course, but it narrowed the difference between the high D and C#, so the C# does not sound that bad now.

But next time I visit my pipemaker I will see what he thinks.

A few good pipers have played my chanter and think its great......But I guess one of my problems is that I do not play that quickly yet so you can hear every note quite well.
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5328
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: C# is flat?

Post by pancelticpiper »

bobkeenan wrote:

A few good pipers have played my chanter and think its great......But I guess one of my problems is that I do not play that quickly yet so you can hear every note quite well.
If this is implying what it appears to be implying, that good pipers play fast and thus aren't able to distinguish whether or not a chanter is in tune, I've never found this to be the case.

"Good pipers" at least by my way of thinking are good musicians, with good fingering yes but also good senses of rhythm and keen ears for pitch.

People with very good ears only need to hear a note for a splitsecond to clearly hear its pitch. Certainly I've seen many good players over the years blasting along on a reel and wincing because their ear caught that a particular note was a tad off.

Anyhow on my particular chanter C# x oxx xxxx is just a couple cents flat of the ET position of that note while C x oxx xoxx is also a hair flat and C x oxx xoox is bang-on to ET. For gigs that require strict ET I give C# a small pressure boost to bring it up (much as I do on flute and whistle) and I use the x oxx xoox fingering for C natural. C natural x oxx xoxx gives a more 'trad' sounding C to my ear.

A funny thing on my chanter is that closing all the fingerholes but pressing the High D key gives a perfectly in tune low-octave C#.

About a low C# key it's a great idea. What I would really like is a High B key, working just like the High C key, to give a perfectly in tune high B. On my chanter, and most Concert Pitch chanters I've tried, there is around a quartertone to eighthtone differential in pitch between Low B and High B.
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
User avatar
PCL
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:39 am

Re: C# is flat?

Post by PCL »

On a chanter pitched at A440 Hz, C# should be 550 Hz and B should be 489 Hz. Both around 1/8 semitone flat of ET. C# is a delicate note at the best of times. As for B in the 2nd octave ...
User avatar
tompipes
Posts: 1328
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:50 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: St. Louis via Dublin
Contact:

Re: C# is flat?

Post by tompipes »

C neutral.....
geoff wooff
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:12 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: centre France

Re: C# is flat?

Post by geoff wooff »

pancelticpiper wrote:



A funny thing on my chanter is that closing all the fingerholes but pressing the High D key gives a perfectly in tune low-octave C#.

.
Richard, your high D key is the one I refer to in my post above as the 'in-tune C# key'.... I believe that was its originally intended use.
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5328
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: C# is flat?

Post by pancelticpiper »

geoff wooff wrote:
Richard, your high D key is the one I refer to in my post above as the 'in-tune C# key'.... I believe that was its originally intended use.
Interesting!

It plays a perfectly in tune High D too, which has come in handy at times.

On my chanter anyhow the keyed High C and High D are so much better than High B. High B is trickier to hit and maintain and tends to be sharp. It would be so much better IMHO to have a High B key right where the High C key usually is, and have the High C key as a 'side key' like it is on the flute.
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
User avatar
PJ
Posts: 5889
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:23 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: ......................................................................................................
Location: Baychimo

Re: C# is flat?

Post by PJ »

I had a flat C# one a chanter which had a hi-D key. Someone suggested that if I didn't need to play the hi-D, I should fill the tone-hole with poster putty (blu-tac), which I did. It solved the C# problem.

I've had a sharp hi B on a few chanters and found that playing a one-finger B can help (x xox xxxx). You have to start the note with a regular two-finger B but then cover the A.
PJ
geoff wooff
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:12 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: centre France

Re: C# is flat?

Post by geoff wooff »

The addition of a high B key would appear to be a very reasonable suggestion Richard.
User avatar
PCL
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:39 am

Re: C# is flat?

Post by PCL »

geoff wooff wrote:The addition of a high B key would appear to be a very reasonable suggestion ...
Which leads to the questions. Why hasn't it been done? Did the old makers know something about high B that we don't? Was it a note generally avoided? What can we learn here?
User avatar
tompipes
Posts: 1328
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:50 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: St. Louis via Dublin
Contact:

Re: C# is flat?

Post by tompipes »

The sharp high B didn't/doesn't seem to be a problem with the narrow bore sets of old.

It can be fixed with the correct combination of bore diameter, hole size, position and scalloping.
Unsuitable staples can highlight the problem too.
I think some reed makers neglect the staple design and put too much effort into making sure the head is scraped and sanded correctly. The head has to be right, of course, but a staple with proper tapering and flattening will and should take the pressure off the blades to perform. Having a suitable rolling mandrel and a flattening mandrel are some of the most important tools for any reed maker.

But a high B key would be nice. I often wonder if the pipes hadn't waned in popularity in the mid 1800's would makers have continued to experiment. Look how the flute and oboe developed in those times. They're different animals entirely because they're not drone based but still one can wonder.
geoff wooff
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:12 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: centre France

Re: C# is flat?

Post by geoff wooff »

PCL wrote:
geoff wooff wrote:The addition of a high B key would appear to be a very reasonable suggestion ...
Which leads to the questions. Why hasn't it been done? Did the old makers know something about high B that we don't? Was it a note generally avoided? What can we learn here?
Why not done before?...; perhaps it was not considered to be such a big problem that needed a special key, after all the Oboe, which has the same problem, has its high B sharpness cured by an automatic mechanism which shuts the G hole ( something similar to the XXOX XXXX fingering) when the upper octave speaker key is held down. Many pipers were happy if their chanter and reed would reach that high!

Did the old makers know something about High B ? Probably!

Does not look to be a note generally avoided if the collected répertoires are anything to go on.

What can we learn here ? : Much has been learned since the making of No.7 ,Patrick, ( as suggested by Tompipes).... such that I don't think I will be adding a high B key to my chanters any time soon.

Richard,
I note that you play on an older chanter from your maker.... perhaps you might enquire to him for an improved version or chanter with that extra key ?
User avatar
rorybbellows
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:50 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: the cutting edge

Re: C# is flat?

Post by rorybbellows »

The old makers probably realised that a sharp high B with in reason doesn't sound to bad.

RORY
I'm Spartacus .
geoff wooff
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:12 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: centre France

Re: C# is flat?

Post by geoff wooff »

rorybbellows wrote:The old makers probably realised that a sharp high B with in reason doesn't sound to bad.

RORY
Within reason yes..... most upper octave notes sound best when they are 'slightly' sharper than those in the lower register... slightly in this sense does mean only a very little, just enough so the notes 'over achieve' the octave and don't sound flat against a drone that might just rise in pitch with the increased pressure.

A B that is too high will give your fiddle playing mate a hard time... if ,that is, they are a sensitive musician who is trying to play 'with you' and not one of those who turn up to a session and tune their instrument to an electronic device and expect the poor old piper to play exactly 440hz Equal Temperament!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :poke:
Post Reply