Have some items to report. Both are real world experiences of sending instruments with rosewoods including blackwood to different countries without permit.
The first involves one of my Folk Flutes in Blackwood originally sold to a client in Great Britain. This person recently sold it to someone in the US via eBay and sent it without any Single Use permit and the recipient also has no permit. The flute appears to have made it through anyway and is in the mail stream. He should know for sure in a few days as the expected delivery is Saturday. I am cautiously holding my breath for him and retain some skepticism that the tracking reflects reality. So far nothing identifies it as specifically having gone through customs. So there could be trouble and I will report the outcome next week. If the instrument is seized, I will get a new flute order out of it for someone who should have shopped locally anyway, whereas the British player loses his money due to non-delivery and eBay rules. Its his karma for unloading one of my instruments perhaps! Actions have consequences.
The second is a Major. Tale. Of. Woe although the one responsible deserves it. Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse.
A friend of a friend who makes high end guitars burst into my friend’s flute making workshop the other day complaining of “Excessive Government Overreach”. Ignoring the fact that the guitar maker supports the current government and is a gun nut besides, my friend and the luthier have a good friendship. Apparently what happened is that this guitar maker sent an instrument worth several thousands with some little bits of Rosewood trimmings here and there on it to a client in one of the northern European Union countries. This maker never bothered to get his required CITES and APHIS permits probably due to his politics.
The guitar arrived in the destination country and was inspected and confiscated by the Authorities. Period. Absolutely Final. Neither maker nor recipient will be able to get this instrument back and it is lost for all practical purposes. Nobody knows what they really do with these once seized. Unfortunately the shipping insurance does not cover such gambling the system and the maker certainly won’t be able to legally declare a loss on his taxes. He was basically breaking the law and law-breaking isn’t covered. Clearly the maker is responsible for this mess, despite the recipient’s requirement to also purchase an import permit from the EU authorities. However, both are arguing over who should suffer the $12,000+ loss.
Its simply not worth gambling the system and the risk factor is high - especially so for higher end and more expensive instruments. Play by the rules, everyone!
I mentioned this story to Jeff Elliott, a great guitar maker in Portland who mentored me way back in high school! He proposed that I write an article for the Guild of American Luthiers and I agreed, and will be pulling from much of what I have written here. I offered a coauthorship to my friend Mike who is also my friendly CITES/APHIS inspector. We have a very good working relationship and plan to have lunch and talk shop when I bring a pile of exporting Folk Flutes over for inspection.
Unfortunately his position doesn’t allow such things as coauthorship, in part due to the dynamic nature of this system with the next CITES meeting to set the rules for next year coming up soon. There may be changes - but most likely in the direction of greater restrictions on some species to CITES I from CITES II, despite the deregulatory environment of my current government. Rememnber that these conventions are via International Treaty. Instead he will provide me with much information, and be one of my peer reviewers. This article will probably be posted at my website where anyone using Rosewoods and other CITES protected species (both I and II) can refer to it to know what the correct procedure is etc.
I am gathering any kind of Tales of Woe, other makers’ experiences from permit getting to inspections. All useful. Please PM me with these data or email it to me. Thanks!
Casey