Opinions Solicited: -Silkstone G/A vs. Water Weasel Low G

-Opinions desired on Silkstone Low
G/A vs. Water Weasel Low G for a running start at low whistling. I treasure my Silkstone alloy D+ soprano whistle, but would like to start low whistling with a quality PVC to avoid the alloy warm-up period, and hope to find
one with a strong bell note and even response in both registers.- Also: Anyone have experience with the new Silkstone
PVC Low D?
-Thanks,
Brian


..Whistlito ergo…

[ This Message was edited by: brianormond on 2002-07-28 14:44 ]

[ This Message was edited by: brianormond on 2002-07-28 14:55 ]

Brian - Please excuse response if you only wanted to hear from those who’ve played both specifically the Silkstone PVC Low A/G and the WW Low G; I haven’t. These things are very much a matter of taste. I very much like the Silkstone PVCs I have (Sop. D, C, Bflat, esp. the C) and the WW A which is one of the better A whistles I’ve played, esp when you consider bang for the buck. It does have even response in both registers, but IMHO is only ok, as opposed to strong bell note.

I can also add from experience that the transition to Low whistles on a G is generally really easy even for those who have some trouble on the Low D, and you’ll still get some idea of that lower “hauntiness” of sound on the G. I think it’s also a versatile key.

That said, I currently own two Low G whistles - Overton and Copeland - and revere both. The Copeland is my favorite, but is very expensive and unless (as I was fortunate enough to do)you get one used, there’d be a long wait. The Overton is less expensive, not that outlandishly more than both you mention, and is well worth it.

Hope that was a bit helpful. Good luck. Philo

I have the entire gamut of Water Weasels, but only the Alloy D of the Silkstone family. I consider the low-G one of the real gems of the WW family. It’s got a good strong bell note, a good amount of chiff, and a pretty good low whistle sound. It takes a fair amount of air, but has noticeable back pressure. The biggest drawback is that the holes are LARGE, so it might not be a great place to start on low whistles. Boxy hands definitely help on this whistle.

Charlie

Hmmm…responding to my own post…

  • Lollycross has posted two pieces on Clips & Snips using the Silkstone PVC High D (not low as I posted earlier) whistle. -Very nice, with accompaniment by hammered dulcimer and harp. ~Found in the Slow Airs section.

-edited for accuracy

-B.


..Whistlito ergo…

[ This Message was edited by: brianormond on 2002-07-28 18:53 ]

[ This Message was edited by: brianormond on 2002-07-28 23:08 ]

I say go for the WW. I tried both when I was deciding on a Low G and found that the WW had the stronger bell note and lower octave. The Silkstone G/A jumped too easily to the second octave.

The only potential drawback with the WW (as mentioned above) is the size of the holes. It wasn’t a problem for me since I had already been playing an Overton F for about a month. However if your looking at eventually getting a low D anyway it wouldn’t hurt to get used to the new fingering.

Just my two cents…

Stonewall

Oh Brian, no, my clips were with the HIGH PVC D. Thanks for listening tho.
lolly

-Indeed it is the high whistle. Sorry!
The recordings, however, are still beautiful.
-Brian

The counter melody on Thom Larson’s lovely rendition of Planxty](http://nwparalegal.com/clipssnip/Audio/misc/PlanxtyIrwinthoml.mp3%3EPlanxty) Irwin was played with a Silkstone PVC low D.
Thom and I have the distinction of being the owners of whistles from the first batch made.
I own #3, Thom owns #2 and Paul kept #1 for himself from that first batch of three whistles.
My opinion of it is the same as my opinion of all of Paul’s whistles… it’s a work of art.
I still prefer my big hole Overton over any low D I have ever played, but that’s just a matter of personal taste.

I haven’t played any Silkstones, but I have a WW low G and absolutely love it.. Actually, once you get used to the larger fingerholes, you may view them as an asset. If you like to play non-traditional tunes ( jazz, pop tunes, Klezmer, etc) which require a lot of half holing, the larger holes make this much easier. Also easier to bend notes on those holes.

-Thanks to all for the opinions! A visit to Michigan from Seattle next week may permit trial of the WW Low G at Elderly Instruments. There’s nothing like having relatives living near a whistle shop.
-Brian

I have a WW G which I quite like. I agree with the above post about the hole size. In my opinion bigger is better.

My WW G is for sale if you’re interested. It’s a great whistle but I rarely play it. When I have a tune in G I usually play it in my Lo-D and I’m trying to fund a new aquisition. Let me know if you’re interested.

Doc
pjandlbj@juno.com

-deleted as duplicate post

[ This Message was edited by: brianormond on 2002-08-19 11:08 ]

Thanks to all for Low G opinions- I just returned from a Michigan family wedding visit with a fine Water Weasel Low G from
Elderly Instruments. -Asked by the salesperson not to test-play it due to saliva liability, I asked the salesperson to check further up the command structure as to whether an interested party could try it out.
-A positive reply conditional on verbal acceptance of saliva risk resulted in
a test and purchase, as its beautiful tone and tuning won me over fast. -Its nice!
-I fear I am now an easy target for the multinational WW low whistle consortium.
-Another happy victim,
Brian