Mysterious New Discoveries on the Far Side of the Moon
Explanation: Locked in synchronous rotation, the Moon always presents its well-known near side to Earth. Surprisingly, the rough and battered surface of the far side looks very different from the near side which is covered with smooth dark lunar maria. The likely explanation is that the far side crust is thicker, making it harder for molten material from the interior to flow to the surface and form the smooth maria.
Spectrographic analysis has shown that the lunar surface has the following proportions of these common elements.
However, new data obtained by powerful new spectrographic techniques show that certain isolated areas on the far side of the moon have a completely different elemental composition.
Strangely enough, this chemical makeup is very similar to that found in bird droppings. The analysis is so precise, measured down to parts per million, that ornithologists have been able to narrow down what species of bird the droppings must have been produced by. The following three species provided the best match.
Adding to the mystery, just in the last week, the following picture was taken.
Yes, supplanted by chickadees. But aren’t those chickadees on the wrong side of the moon?
Green cheese indeed.
Not an appetizing cracker spread at all, eh?
How could there be a photo taken just last week of the far side of the moon? We don’t have anything out there now!
And I googled on the element breakdown-- it matches something found here
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Most of the product resulting from poultry feeding operations is manure and not animal. protein . 26. Table 2: Approximate % of intake nutrients excreted in … www.agr.gc.ca/poultry/manure.pdf
I posted this suspicious article on the homeschool bulletin board and got the following responses. Clearly, these kids need to be working on spelling. General thought process seems good though.
The bird droppings part was kinda weird and Oxagen and a lot of it in the soil? WHAT!?!?
and there CAN’T be chickadees on the moon for two reasons…one there is no atmosphear on the moon so they would die becawse they would not be able to breathe… reason two the craters on the moon can be miles across so the chickadees would have to be HUGE!
Which made me wonder,
Just how big are these lunar chickadees?
The radius of the moon is 1079 miles. Say ~ 1000 miles
Then the diameter of the moon is ~ 2000 miles.
The large picture of the moon has the moon at about ~ 20 cm (~ 200 mm)
The birds in the big picture look like specks about 1 mm across.
So if you made a line of birds straight across the picture, it would take 200 of them.
The real moon is ~ 2000 miles.
Divide that into 200 bits, means each bird is about 10 miles long.
I’m not sure how the moon is able to support a population of 10-mile chickadees.
That sure would explain the deposits of bird poop on the far side of the moon, though.
When I googled on this story, I found that already there’s some concern that the lunar chickadees might start an invasion.
A ten-mile chickadee could really do a number on Washington.
Those home school kids should learn that oxygen is the most abundant element on earth, and most of it is found in the Earth’s crust (i.e. rocks), not in the air.
In 1998, NASA sent another spacecraft, Lunar Prospector…which eventually sacrificed itself to the search. When the spacecraft’s primary mission was finished, NASA decided to crash Prospector near the Moon’s south pole, hoping to liberate a bit of its meager layer of water. …Either there was no water, or there was not enough water to be detected by Earth-based telescopes, or the telescopes were not looking in precisely the right place. In any event, no water was found from Prospector’s impact.
In 2008, NASA plans to send a new spacecraft to the Moon: the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), bristling with advanced sensors that can sense water in at least four different ways. Scientists are hopeful that LRO can decide the question of Moon water once and for all.
It sounds to me like the evidence of water on the moon is pretty strong.
First of all, the swans IB mentioned are aquatic birds and need water to land on.
And secondly, how can you dispute the evidence of pictures like this?
All that you touch and all that you see
All that you taste, all you feel
And all that you love and all that you hate
All you distrust, all you save
And all that you give and all that you deal
And all that you buy, beg, borrow or steal
And all you create and all you destroy
And all that you do and all that you say
And all that you eat and everyone you meet
And all that you slight and everyone you fight
And all that is now and all that is gone
And all that’s to come and everything under the sun is in tune
But the sun is eclipsed by the moon
There is no dark side of the water really.
Matter of fact, its all wet.
General thought process seems good though.
