Hello! I’m a pretty big newb to whistles, having played turkish reed flute for about a year now.
I saw a lot of discussions around MK Pros, but I think a more detailed information around Kelpies is invaluable, because of newbs who might be scared to drop big price tickets on Pros.
First of all, I think even if I were a pro and had to rely on a tunable for recordings and sessions, I think a Kelpie is indispensable, because just how indestructible it really is and how on-point the tuning is for A=440hz. In the winter air here in Turkey, at around 2-3C I play a smooth A=432hz on it at a harsh climate (and if it’s below 0 outside when you play it, maybe don’t play an instrument in the first place!) When it’s warmed up and it really gets easily warmed up in a few minutes, it has a solid lower end, well-defined second octave and quite a bit volume. Last two keys take a bit more push but nothing unreasonable whatsoever.
For a mainly A=432 enjoyer especially on windblown instruments, I’ll take the untunable compromise for the sheer ease of carry-and-play and the price tag. Even if I’m considering a Pro D for lower tunings, I don’t think I could get rid of my Kelpie as a reliable street companion. There’s not much ready-to-buy low Ds out there in the market and I’m more than enthused to have bought this beauty.
While all of my whistles are tunable, and I wouldn’t buy a whistle that wasn’t, I do acknowledge that I generally keep them tuned at the same spot.
Here in California we’re not faced with extreme weather.
But, though it’s rare for me to move a tuning slide, the tuning slides of all my whistles are placed where I need them, which might or might not be where a maker living in a quite different climate might fix his tuning.
My experience over the years is that fixed-pitched whistles, by whatever maker and wherever made, generally play too sharp for me here.
Years ago I owned six different MK Low D’s at various points in time, all of them tunable. These were all made prior to the Pro/Kelpie division. All of them had an identical tuning quirk: Bottom D was flatter than Middle D.
Half of them had a slightly longer tube, making Middle D in tune but Bottom D flat.
Half had a slightly shorter tube, making Bottom D in tune but Middle D sharp.
This suggests that Misha was aware of the issue and was experimenting with different solutions. I’ve not played a recent MK but I would assume that Misha had sorted this by now.
I just tested on 440 pano tuner and low d was bang on spot, to the point of breaking when challenged beyond the pitch, and second d starts off quite volumely and has a wide sharper range.