I had been playing one flute almost exclusively since late last spring. In’ a beginner and had heard or read in many places that sticking to one flute is a very good idea, which makes perfect sense. The flute I’ve been playing is a Bleazey Rudall; it’s easy to get a good sound from it, and it’s easy on the air. Plus it’s small-holed, so ornaments are very crisp.
I’ve begun lessons, and one problem I’ve been addressing is not overblowing in the second octave. I was having a dickens of a time with anything above about the G after a few weeks of trying to learn to be breath-conservative. Well, I had a Thin Weasel that I gave to my wife a couple of years ago, and which she wasn’t crazy about. I had tried to learn on it, but it always left me breathless. Glenn has told me that this began as a Rudall design, but rapidly became his own. It’s big-holed and plays nothing like the Bleazey.
So I tried it out about a week ago. It played like a dream! VERY easy top of the upper octave and bottom of the lower, not all that difficult to play up to the third-octave G. I was having trouble with it last night, so I switched back to the Bleazey today, and now it’s easier.
This goes against all the conventional wisdom. I had thought that the Bleazey had taught me a focussed embouchure and that the Schultz was a little more forgiving. But shouldn’t that be a one-way street? I wouldn’t think that a flute that allows one to be a little sloppier would benefit your playing of the other. I suppose the other possibility is that I progressed that much in a week, but I don’t feel that way.
Any theories or, better yet, has anyone else felt like playing two different flutes has made you progress faster.
Finally, I picked up a soprano D whistle today, evidently for the first time in awhile. Gawd, it sounds wimpy. I’m really worried that I might drop the whistle completely. Anyone else felt like this when they started to get into the flute, coming from a whistle background?