Warning … rant ahead …
What makes you think this is true? Is it your personal experience that the tolerances vary and that they suffer from flash? Or are you just repeating what you’ve read here on the Chiffboard, and maybe elsewhere?
Honestly, this idea that so many Generations are bad seems to be one of those internet memes or urban legends that are just impossible to kill once they get started. It’s Gresham’s Law of information, with bad information driving out the good.
I’m definitely not picking on you, Pipe Bender, far from it. Just using this as an opportunity for another attempt to put a stake through the heart of this insidious vampire meme.
I have played/tried maybe a few dozen Generations in my life. Granted, that’s not a huge sample. But the fact is that NOT A SINGLE GENERATION I HAVE EVER PLAYED HAS BEEN BAD. NOT ONE. And these have all been straight off-the-shelf Gens, no special tweaks. Old style (ridge and dimple). New style, both right after the mid-80s change and current stock in the shops today. They have all been JUST FINE, with the typical, classic Generation sound and feel. And I seriously doubt I’ve been living under a special lucky star.
When Ryan Duns teaches his whistle classes, he orders Generation Ds for his entire class of beginners. Why would he do this if he thought he would be giving his students bad whistles?
I used to accept the “bad Generation” meme on face value, too, despite the fact that it didn’t square with my own experience. But after years of observing great-sounding Generations turn up constantly in sessions, tionóls, concerts, videos, classes, etc., I’d be crazy not to question the validity of this meme.
It’s true, there is some variation among the Gens I’ve tried. Some are a bit purer sounding, some a bit more aggressive. The 4 Gen Ds in my stable cover this spectrum, and it’s nice to have that choice. But the range of variation is no greater than any other brand/make of whistle I’ve tried.
I once bought a dozen or so Feadóg Ds in a batch, and the spread of variation was at least as much as the Generations, if not more. For that matter, I’ve tried a number of Burkes, Copelands, Susatos, etc., and the range of variation of those has been MORE than that of Generations. The issue of variation is hardly confined to cheapies.
People who have actually played large numbers of Generations tend to report a sort of Gaussian bell curve distribution of quality. That is, 10% may be outstanding whistles, 10% may be ones that you’d tend to reject, and the other 80% are perfectly OK. Given the nature of mass manufacturing and the tiny tolerances involved, this may be a similar picture for any whistle. If every maker would toss out the worst 10% of their production that people tend to focus on, the perceived problem would largely vanish.
As for flashing … Both in my experience and anecdotally, Waltons and Clares have been far more afflicted by bad flashing than Generations (not to mention Waltons short tubes and bad tuning, at least in the past). And yet you hardly see Waltons and Clares get bashed the way Generations routinely are.
I am 100% convinced that the so-called problem with Gens has far more to do with whistle players than with the whistles. Gens are narrow bore instruments that take good breath control to make them sing properly and to control the flexible intonation. They also have a considerable amount of chiff and chirp, which is EXACTLY why so many experienced players like them. They are a bit challenging to play, but the payoff from mastering them is the classic Irish whistle sound that you can get from few other instruments.
But put these characteristics in the hands of inexperienced players, and you instantly get complaints of harshness, scratchiness, bad tuning, etc. I’m honestly not sure what else people expect. I know of no other woodwind instrument - clarinet, flute, etc. - that you can put in the hands of a beginner, and when it sounds bad the first impulse is to blame the instrument. With a chorus of other inexperienced players on the Chiffboard and elsewhere on the internet ready to chime in and agree with this irrational logic.
It’s as if there’s an underlying assumption that playing the whistle requires no technique. You just blow and play. So any problems are the whistle’s fault, and the solution is to try another whistle. You can read on the Chiffboard about things like diaphragm control, backpressure, intonation pressure plateaus, embouchure position, mouth cavity shape, blowing into tune, playing the chirp, finger speed, etc. - all things which are eminently applicable to playing Generations. Then, side by side with the “bad Generation” meme you can read another oft-expressed meme that “a good player can make any whistle sound good”. What’s wrong with this picture?
As I’ve said before here, I think there are umpteen reasons why a whistler might choose to play a whistle other than a Generation for a particular purpose in a particular setting with particular personal preferences. I love my Burkes, Sindts, Overtons, Copelands, Susatos, Freemans, and I use and play them all. But ultimately, the Generation is the reference standard by which I measure them all. And if I can’t articulate a MUSICAL reason why I choose one of these others and sacrifice the Generation sound for some other advantage, then I haven’t done my homework.
I realize that a rant like this is probably not going to settle the issue. There are plenty of other whistles out there. People will always pick and choose what they want to believe because it makes them happy. Generation’s lack of corporate outreach to the community of whistle enthusiasts will continue to hurt their perceived reputation. The best trad whistle players here on the board can argue from their experience, but that doesn’t communicate well or convincingly in cyberprint without face to face interaction. So I’m sure the “bad Generation” vampire will rise again when darkness falls. 