Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

A forum about Uilleann (Irish) pipes and the surly people who play them.
Post Reply
joconnor58
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 9:50 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Not a new musician, but fairly new to the Uilleann Pipes. I am primarily a bass player, studied jazz bass in university, but also play, piano, saxophone, clarinet and drums. Looking forward to a long and happy experience with the pipes!
Location: Lexington, KY, USA

Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by joconnor58 »

Warning: The following question will be written using generalities and applying those generalities to reeds. It is well noted that in using generalities when speaking of reeds, questions and answers end up being over simplified.

So the question is about ease-of playability. By that I mean, how much air resistance the reed creates against the air passing through it. One reed may require more pressure from the bag, another reed may require less pressure.

So generally speaking, if all else were equal (*yeah, that'll happen :really: ) - which one is louder? My knowledge of acoustics and some common sense have me thinking that "harder" playing reed is quieter, the "easier" playing reed is louder. But then I think about it again and change my mind, thinking the "harder" reed is louder.......

Uilleann Forumites, What say you?

thanks
Learning to breathe with my elbows.....
patsky
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:27 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Contact:

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by patsky »

The harder the reed is to play...the louder, flatter and better the tone. Many of the masters such as Paddy Keenan, David Power, Jerry O'Sullivan,etc. play reeds that are so hard that one has to be an athlete to play them. I personally compromise and play the reeds somewhere in the middle.

Pat Sky
Pipes, Reeds and free information on my website: http://www.patricksky.com
User avatar
uillmann
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:06 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: between rock and hard place

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by uillmann »

Loudness is a result of elevation, i.e. the length of the gap between the lips of the blades.

Generally,

The more open your reed is, the greater the amplitude of the resulting soundwave.

The more open your reed is, the thicker it must be to perform the required frequencies.

The thicker your reed is, the more pounds per square inch of pressure on the bag is required to make it sound.

The more pounds per square inch of pressure on the bag is required, the harder you will have to squeeze the bag.

Efficiency is a function of all of the above, with the added twist that a particular scrape will be able to achieve the above with less pressure, albeit with an added idiosyncrasy of playability, or less desirable tone quality.

And therein lies the rub. One must decide where, on the rub scale, one wishes to play.

Sometimes. Maybe. I think. Although, of course, I may be wrong. But I think so. Usually. Except for those times when I think I am wrong. Which is on occasion. But not on those occasions where I am sure I am wrong. Which does happen. But not always. But it does happen. Now and then. But not usually.

And, of course, there are those other times, (roughly half the time,) when the complete opposite is true. And then you have to look at it all from the "other" perspective.

Somewhere, in between, is a reed you like. On occasion. Or not. Or sometimes, depending on the weather, or your hangover, or whether you had a good breakfast, or whether there is a guitar player present that you detest, or your girlfriends mood, & etc....
User avatar
an seanduine
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:06 pm
antispam: No
Location: just outside Xanadu

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by an seanduine »

Uillmann wrote:
And therein lies the rub. One must decide where, on the rub scale, one wishes to play.

Sometimes. Maybe. I think. Although, of course, I may be wrong. But I think so. Usually. Except for those times when I think I am wrong. Which is on occasion. But not on those occasions where I am sure I am wrong. Which does happen. But not always. But it does happen. Now and then. But not usually.

And, of course, there are those other times, (roughly half the time,) when the complete opposite is true. And then you have to look at it all from the "other" perspective.

Somewhere, in between, is a reed you like. On occasion. Or not. Or sometimes, depending on the weather, or your hangover, or whether you had a good breakfast, or whether there is a guitar player present that you detest, or your girlfriends mood, & etc....
:lol: :lol:

Too true! :D

Bob
Not everything you can count, counts. And not everything that counts, can be counted

The Expert's Mind has few possibilities.
The Beginner's mind has endless possibilities.
Shunryu Suzuki, Roshi
joconnor58
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 9:50 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Not a new musician, but fairly new to the Uilleann Pipes. I am primarily a bass player, studied jazz bass in university, but also play, piano, saxophone, clarinet and drums. Looking forward to a long and happy experience with the pipes!
Location: Lexington, KY, USA

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by joconnor58 »

uillmann wrote: Sometimes. Maybe. I think. Although, of course, I may be wrong. But I think so. Usually. Except for those times when I think I am wrong. Which is on occasion. But not on those occasions where I am sure I am wrong. Which does happen. But not always. But it does happen. Now and then. But not usually.

And, of course, there are those other times, (roughly half the time,) when the complete opposite is true. And then you have to look at it all from the "other" perspective.

Somewhere, in between, is a reed you like. On occasion. Or not. Or sometimes, depending on the weather, or your hangover, or whether you had a good breakfast, or whether there is a guitar player present that you detest, or your girlfriends mood, & etc....
This disclaimer ought to be attached to any discourse on reeds.
Learning to breathe with my elbows.....
uilleannfinlander
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 6:34 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Finland,Oulu-city200km south from articcirclr
Contact:

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by uilleannfinlander »

patsky wrote:The harder the reed is to play...the louder, flatter and better the tone. Many of the masters such as Paddy Keenan, David Power, Jerry O'Sullivan,etc. play reeds that are so hard that one has to be an athlete to play them. I personally compromise and play the reeds somewhere in the middle.

Pat Sky
Played Paddys pipes when was here, didn't find reed extremely hard.........really comfortable to play.
User avatar
PJ
Posts: 5889
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:23 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: ......................................................................................................
Location: Baychimo

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by PJ »

In my own meagre experience, volume (amount of sound) is more about the internal volume (space) in the reed, which is defined by the gouging/sanding of the inside of the reed.*

A reed that requires significant pressure would risk throwing out the balance of the drones and regulators.


*I think Andreas Rogge mentions the relationship between internal volume and sound in the Heart of the Instrument DVD.
PJ
User avatar
CHasR
Posts: 2464
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:48 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: canned tuna-aisle 6

Re: Reed ease-of-playability versus volume

Post by CHasR »

first want to say that ive never fully understood what goes on in the uilleann pipes chanter reed. in particular its staple (what is UP with that thing?!?omg. :boggle: )

however, other NORMAL double reeds i have got a decent handle on,
and have vats of rejects to prove it.

In the ideal situation, (lmfao, rofl & w-t-faghettaboutit :lol: )

one wants a strong, hard inflexible skeleton of cane that's pretty close to the bark;
and as-much-as-possible surface of ultralight material to afford maximal vibration; (except of course for the heart and blend. :wink: )

whew. dreamin's nice innit :sleep:
personnaly, i will take ease of playability over volume ANY day... but thats just li'l ol' me :love:
Post Reply