In other news: Nanobelts
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
- Tyler
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
- Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
- Contact:
Just something to help him keep his pants upizzarina wrote:and here I thought it was something to keep Nano away.
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
Or, for our British friends, his trousers. Even nanobelts do nothing to keep one's underwear up.Tyler Morris wrote:Just something to help him keep his pants up
P.S., does anyone else hear the Mr. Roger's "F-R-I-E-N-D, special" song whenever they try to remember how to spell "friend"? I think I may go mad.
- Joseph E. Smith
- Posts: 13780
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: ... who cares?...
- Contact:
I am afraid that I don't understand the problem with quasi-one-dimensional.fearfaoin wrote:OK, now that I've actually read the article:How the heck is something supposed to be quasi-one-dimensional?the article in question wrote:The detectors are based on a new kind of quasi-one dimensional nano material
I was pretty sure dimensionality was measured on an integer scale...
I think that they mean quite a bit thinner that pond scum!
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
Maybe it's all in how you wear your nanobelt, Izz? But I would have thought that a nanobelt was something more like those power cuffs that that one superheoess with the leotard, skimpy skirt, All-Star Wrestling belt, floridly curly black hair and B-movie "tiara" used to deflect bullets with.izzarina wrote:Stupid thing...and here I paid a fortune for it.Nanohedron wrote:as you can see, I'm BAAAAACK. Ha.
Ah, yes. Wonder Woman, that's it.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
- Wombat
- Posts: 7105
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong
Mightn't something like a string of electrons fit the bill?fearfaoin wrote:I'm a pragmatist. If it's "almost one-dimensional, but not quite", then it's bloody two-dimensional.Denny wrote:I am afraid that I don't understand the problem with quasi-one-dimensional.
Point taken.Furthermore, Denny wrote:I think that they mean quite a bit thinner that pond scum!