A380 flies

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
Post Reply
User avatar
GaryKelly
Posts: 3090
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:09 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Swindon UK

A380 flies

Post by GaryKelly »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4488361.stm


"The world's largest passenger plane, the Airbus A380, has landed safely, completing its maiden flight."

"The A380 - designed to carry as many as 840 people between major airports - took off from its production site in southern France just after 0830 GMT."

840 people. Why does part of me wince at the size of that number?
Image "It might be a bit better to tune to one of my fiddle's open strings, like A, rather than asking me for an F#." - Martin Milner
IRTradRU?
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:27 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1

Re: A380 flies

Post by IRTradRU? »

GaryKelly wrote:840 people. Why does part of me wince at the size of that number?

Same here. :boggle:
IRTradRU?
User avatar
OutOfBreath
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: West of Ft. Worth, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by OutOfBreath »

Yep, if one of those augers in it will easily eclipse the carnage from the collision of two 747s a couple of decades ago...

I wonder if it has the anti-missile defense? It sure would be a nice fat target for a terrorist...
John
-------
The Internet is wonderful. Surely there have always been thousands of people deeply concerned about my sex life and the quality of my septic tank but before the Internet I never heard from any of them.
IRTradRU?
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:27 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1

Post by IRTradRU? »

The other thing about this behemoth is the current cost of fuel to run it.

FOUR engines - two on each wing... 840 bodies... luggage.... cargo...

that's a lot of fuel so that a whole bunch of folks that don't know each other can all go to the same place at the same time.

It should be dubbed, 'the Hummer* of the skies'.





* - Hummer: for the uninitiated, the Hummer is a monster-sized truck/car/passenger vehicle designed for the military, but later made into civilian versions, with all the creature comforts. Priced between $50,000 and $60,000 US$, their gas mileage is usually referenced in 'gallons per mile' rather than 'miles per gallon'.

:wink:
IRTradRU?
User avatar
RonKiley
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 12:53 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Germantown, MD

Post by RonKiley »

My son in law works for Airbus. He says that they have not been selling in the US. The US airlines are opting for the new Boeing plane that is smaller and more fuel efficient. It is designed to fly direct between both major and smaller cities. I hope to get a chance to fly the simulator for the Airbus one day soon. My son in law is a simulation engineer. I have flown the A 340 simulator. It is so realistic the FAA will certify a pilot in the simulator alone.

Ron
I've never met a whistle I didn't want.
User avatar
BillChin
Posts: 1700
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:24 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Light on the ocean
Contact:

Post by BillChin »

The big plane certainly fits certain needs. If full, the fuel economy per passenger mile is the best in the industry, or so Airbus claims. Of course, operational results are not in yet. There are many airports where flight time slots are extremely valuable. Having more passengers for one flight slot is a blessing for them.

One significant downside in that airports have to rebuild runways and terminals to accommodate the behemoth.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... c18_2.html

http://www.yeald.com/Yeald/a/33941/both ... tures.html
IRTradRU?
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:27 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1

Post by IRTradRU? »

BillChin wrote:One significant downside in that airports have to rebuild runways and terminals to accommodate the behemoth.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... c18_2.html

http://www.yeald.com/Yeald/a/33941/both ... tures.html

Excellent point. It isn't exactly cheap to build a new runway.
IRTradRU?
User avatar
Bloomfield
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Location: Location:

Post by Bloomfield »

IRTradRU? wrote:
BillChin wrote:One significant downside in that airports have to rebuild runways and terminals to accommodate the behemoth.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... c18_2.html

http://www.yeald.com/Yeald/a/33941/both ... tures.html

Excellent point. It isn't exactly cheap to build a new runway.
Nothing is too dear if it means poking Boeing in the eye.

:roll:
/Bloomfield
User avatar
Henke
Posts: 2193
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Sweden

Post by Henke »

I acctually sat and watched the maiden flight live on the tv for a few minutes before I left home today. Impressive plane is all I can say. It was quite interesting.
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

It's maiden voyage? Good thing it didn't hit an iceburg.


IRTradRU - Glad you defined hummer. The perverts here were giggling like schoolboys.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
Martin Milner
Posts: 4350
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: London UK

Post by Martin Milner »

I thought this thread was going to be about the number of windscreen splats you collect driving on the A380, Gary.

Now I'm really disappointed.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that schwing
Post Reply