Rescuing The Bible From Fundamentalism, by John Shelby Spong
-
- Posts: 15580
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA
Rescuing The Bible From Fundamentalism, by John Shelby Spong
Somebody (Dale Wisely, perhaps?) reccomended this book (written by an Episcopal Bishop) on the forum a couple months ago. I found out that www.quakerbooks.org had a surplus and they were on sale for $6.50 so I bought one and I got it a couple of days ago.
Wow.
It really is a page turner. I can't stop reading it. I'm taking it to my Bible class today and hoping I don't get called names for bringing up some of its points and questions, which I intend to do.
Everybody should read it.
Wow.
It really is a page turner. I can't stop reading it. I'm taking it to my Bible class today and hoping I don't get called names for bringing up some of its points and questions, which I intend to do.
Everybody should read it.
Last edited by Jack on Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Flyingcursor
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
- Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"
- Lorenzo
- Posts: 5726
- Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Oregon, USA
Spong is wrong about several things.
At some point, with the advancement of science, the heavens became too technical for religious people to be explaining. In the same way, the Bible is also too technical to be explained without the assistence of an unbiased qualified historian.
Spong is not that historian.
At some point, with the advancement of science, the heavens became too technical for religious people to be explaining. In the same way, the Bible is also too technical to be explained without the assistence of an unbiased qualified historian.
Spong is not that historian.
Re: Rescuing The Bible From Fundamentalism, by John Shelby S
Cranberry wrote:I'm taking it to my Bible class today and hoping I don't get called names for bringing up some of its points and questions, which I intend to do.
Uh oh. Better bring that spork. You may need it for self-defense.
-
- Posts: 15580
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA
Who is?Lorenzo wrote:Spong is wrong about several things.
At some point, with the advancement of science, the heavens became too technical for religious people to be explaining. In the same way, the Bible is also too technical to be explained without the assistence of an unbiased qualified historian.
Spong is not that historian.
- Flyingcursor
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
- Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"
I would hope you don't get called names for asking questions. Questions are good. It's the answers that can be bothersome.
I've read some of his stuff. He dismisses Christ and His atoning sacrifice. Since the belief in that sacrifice is the very heart of the Christian faith, he is basically expounding a new religion. Why doesn't he leave the Episcopol church and make his own? Wouldn't that take a load off?
I've read some of his stuff. He dismisses Christ and His atoning sacrifice. Since the belief in that sacrifice is the very heart of the Christian faith, he is basically expounding a new religion. Why doesn't he leave the Episcopol church and make his own? Wouldn't that take a load off?
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
That's what I was going to ask, too.Cranberry wrote:Who is?Lorenzo wrote:Spong is wrong about several things.
At some point, with the advancement of science, the heavens became too technical for religious people to be explaining. In the same way, the Bible is also too technical to be explained without the assistence of an unbiased qualified historian.
Spong is not that historian.
Lorenzo, have you managed to actually find an unbiased qualified Bible historian? And, if so, has this person written any books? I'm honestly curious.
Thanks,
John
Giles: "We few, we happy few."
Spike: "We band of buggered."
Spike: "We band of buggered."
-
- Posts: 15580
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA
I'm honestly curious, too.jsluder wrote:That's what I was going to ask, too.Cranberry wrote:Who is?Lorenzo wrote:Spong is wrong about several things.
At some point, with the advancement of science, the heavens became too technical for religious people to be explaining. In the same way, the Bible is also too technical to be explained without the assistence of an unbiased qualified historian.
Spong is not that historian.
Lorenzo, have you managed to actually find an unbiased qualified Bible historian? And, if so, has this person written any books? I'm honestly curious.
Thanks,
John
- missy
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
- Contact:
I'm currently (ok, I've been at it since Christmas) trying to read through Isaac Asimov's Guide to the Bible. This is a BIG book (it covers old and new Testiments). It is written ONLY from a historical standpoint - trying to place biblical names and places, showing inacuracies and how things do match up, etc. Dr. Asimov (so far in my reading) has taken NO stand on the "truthfullness" of the teaching of the Bible.
As I said, this is a LONG book, filled with lots of details, maps, etc. Not counting the glossary, etc - it's over 1200 pages.
If I do get through it, I'll give more of my impressions.
Missy
As I said, this is a LONG book, filled with lots of details, maps, etc. Not counting the glossary, etc - it's over 1200 pages.
If I do get through it, I'll give more of my impressions.
Missy
- Lorenzo
- Posts: 5726
- Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Oregon, USA
I'd start with Noss. His book, Man's Religions (6th edition, revised 1980), is a good starting point with no bias that I could detect. There are perhaps hundreds of qualified scholars/writers/historians contributing to his book from various angles of Judism and Christianity, and the scriptural historical background.
If you like that book try this one: The Pagan Christ by Tom Harpur.
http://www.tomharpur.com/
This will get you thinking.
Book review here:
http://www.tomharpur.com/Reviews/PaganChrist.asp
http://www.tomharpur.com/
This will get you thinking.
Book review here:
http://www.tomharpur.com/Reviews/PaganChrist.asp
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.