Denny wrote:Lorenzo wrote:I'm actually not allowed to have two dwellings on the property (zoning regulations) so I intend to relocate this old cabin up in the woods where no one will ever find it. I'll call it an out-building, or woodshed if anyone asks. So that's why it has to come down before I build the new one.
I thought that's about what I was reading into your posts...
That's why I wanted to get it done when no one was around!
What happped is, back in the 80's sometime, the county rezoned everything in the country to 240 ac/dwelling. I can understand, and agree with, that 5 acre lots were getting to be a nuisance...and a problem for not only the county, but everyone else too. For example, roads were getting used more (upkeep), fire hazards were greater, code enforcement required more staffing, and the looks of the countryside was being replaced.
So, today you can drive back though the countryside and everything looks just the same. But, most people thought it was a "takings" even though courts have decided that rezones are not takings. What people want was a practical compromise, like 40 acres, or 80 acres p/dwelling. My 80 did not qualify to even build a house on. The cabin did not qualify for "replacement" because it was not up to building code standards.
So, the previous owner (the person I bought the property from) had gone through a legal process to qualify for a building permit. He had piggy-backed onto someone else's (non-contiguous) 160 acres to add up to the 240 required. State law allows for this kind of process, and the county was forced to comply. That other property owner signed a statement saying he could never build on that 160.
IMO, there's no property around the valley that couldn't exist just fine with one dwelling per 40 acres. The rezone was really a "takings." So, people out in the country often don't do things right to the letter because gov't officials, esp in Oregon, are not always reasonable with their decisions. Sure they can be voted out, and the rules changed back, but that's not really an excuse to go ahead and be unreasonable, according to us country folks. We'd get out-voted by city people who want the countryside to look like part of the wilderness area, whci we are not!
So, nearly everyone out in the country takes the law into their own hands (tiny little laws that don't really matter and can't be enforced) and go ahead and remodel a room without a permit, replace a leaky pipe without a plumbing permit, add one more heat register to a system without a mechanical permit, or move an outbuilding on skids w/o getting a permit.
Too bad, but local gov't was really kind of asking for it. Maybey I'll mention this to the monk and see what he thinks. It should be easy to communicate with him since Buddhists aren't really religious, nor do they believe in God.