projektio28 wrote:
I've often heard that the bagpipes are thought to have originated in the Middle East or India.
Yes one often hears that. Trouble is, there's no evidence of a Middle Eastern or Indian origin. The earliest evidence is all European.
Now, if you throw out the bag part of a bagpipe, yes there have been various mouthblown things all over the world. But I require a thing to have a bag if I'm going to consider it a bagpipe.
In any case, the origin of the GHB is an extremely interesting topic, one which has had much more imagination than scholarship applied to it.
The similarities between early GHBs and Spanish gaitas cannot be denied. Indeed Baines put the gaita, biniou, and GHB into a family, and offers reasonable-sounding support for his choice.
What I find very interesting is the drone pattern. Across Europe, bagpipes tended to have a bass drone as their first drone, with a tenor (or in some cases baritone) added later in some traditions, giving a total of two drones. (Most bagpipe species still have a bass only, and even today it's common for gaitas to have a bass only, or if a tenor is present the tenor often has a shutoff switch.)
From the scant evidence, the Irish warpipe followed the common European pattern.
But we encounter some early GHBs with two tenors and no bass. Then I came across Julian Goodacre's Danish pipes, based on an early illustration showing exactly the same drone setup. It makes one wonder about possible Scandinavian influences, not far-fetched when we recall that over half of the old Highland clans had a Scandinavian, not Gaelic, origin.