And now.......
Some constructive thoughts, for the melting pot/musical debate that I think this thread offers once you subtract all the Y chromosomes and testosterone
from it
*****************************************************************
I've been rehearsing tunes for a performance, ones we all belt out happily at sessions, I guess...and it has been an interesting experience.
We have recorded ourselves digitally and played the tunes back.
It is surprising how often it can sound dissonant.
Although we have similar versions of hundreds of tunes, we only sound "good" when we are playing the same notes at the same time, so we might be playing away at a tune and then "Ouch, what was that?" when we hit a bar that we each do differently.
So even when I know a standard tune setting, from a reliable source, that fits with a recording or a session that I have access to, when I go to play with new musicians, I find they often play a slightly different version.
In a loud session, it matters little, as the subtlety of the music is totally lost in the cacophony
But if there are only 2 or 3 players, my notes will stand out as being different, and if they don't harmonise with what the regulars are playing....ouch!!!
Or if the speed I like to play the tune at is not the same as them....ouch!
Or if they play a tune that sounds like the tune I know but is in fact a closely related but different tune...ouch!
Or if they play a variation 3rd time through...and I don't know cos I've never been to that session b4....ouch!
Interestingly, the ITM player I play with mostly is in a jazz band (clarinet) as well as a ceilidh band...... he would be the first to say how hard ITM is to get a grip on, whereas in jazz he has freedom to improvise.
***************************************************************************
Boyd