I had exactly the same experience.emmline wrote:Thanks for bringing this up. I saw that ad on tv 2 days ago. I almost couldn't believe the irresponsibility.
I hope the backlash blows them into the age of the tailfin.
Best wishes,
Jerry
As someone who drove a Jeep Wrangler for 11 years (but now drives a Subaru), my first reaction upon seeing that Roller Coaster ad on TV was, "Wow, I think that's the most irresponsible automobile ad I've ever seen." Those things are not designed for that kind of "fun". They're designed to go slow over rough terrain.Jerry Freeman wrote:I had exactly the same experience.emmline wrote:Thanks for bringing this up. I saw that ad on tv 2 days ago. I almost couldn't believe the irresponsibility.
I hope the backlash blows them into the age of the tailfin.
Thanks. Keep me posted about this. I'd like to know what people find, over the long run, the effects are.Peter Laban wrote:There has, ofcourse, been a good deal of discussion about this in the media. The road safety authorities seem to feel it is effective enough and I can assure you that if you watch television at all while a campaign is running you'll get to see the clips and you'll see them often.Dale wrote: As best I can tell, the shock-style approach has a very short term effect on behavior. Like days, maybe.
I think that goes to show where the "hard hitting" concept is hitting at: everyone except the target audience. The target audience is sitting there with their little gears turning round and round saying, "Oh yeah, this is coming from adults, so we already know where they're going with all this stuff so we can just tune them right out." (worked for me)Dale wrote:They all gasped when the final frame was "Have Fun...," etc.
What about singing or humming? I was driving home tonight sort of watching the sun go down, and I just couldn't help humming Canadian Sunset to myself.Dale wrote:DON'T WHISTLE WHILE DRIVING!
I'm not following you.djm wrote:I think that goes to show where the "hard hitting" concept is hitting at: everyone except the target audience. The target audience is sitting there with their little gears turning round and round saying, "Oh yeah, this is coming from adults, so we already know where they're going with all this stuff so we can just tune them right out." (worked for me)Dale wrote:They all gasped when the final frame was "Have Fun...," etc.
I'm boycotting Ford for the chase scene in Bullit, Honda/Acura/Toyota/Mitsubishi for race scenes in The Fast and the Furious, and Chevy for letting us think that Autobots would stoop to being GM cars.Dale wrote:I could be fairly accused of being preoccupied by the crash rate and fatality rate among young drivers. See my website www.parentingteendrivers.com .
Here's part of what we're up against. Go to the following link and run the 30 second video called "Roller Coaster."
http://www.jeep.com/en/2009/tv_commercials/gallery/
Thanks.
Dale
Excellent! there hasn't been a study that doesn't show the negative impact of phone use while driving. I had a shuttle driver from a car repair shop tell me the other day that his daughter texts approximately 12,000 times a month (I thought he was pulling my leg but I guess she is under average) much if it to her boy friend while he is driving to and from her home 45 miles from his, at night.Dale wrote:Someone brought up cell phones. Let me take this opportunity to beg everyone who reads this to stop using your cell phones when you drive. I have been guilty of this myself and recently resolved to stop and -- so far so good. (About 3 weeks of sobriety!)
Dale
You were pointing out that the kids were surprised when the video showed them scenes of people ripping up the countryside and ended up telling them to have fun. I'm suggesting that the kids were surprised because they were already mentally prepared for another, "Now, children, don't you go speeding and having fun," -type video, and were already set to block you/your message out.Dale wrote:I'm not following you.