James Becker new whistle maker review
- keithsandra
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:55 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: BC., Canada
James Becker new whistle maker review
James D. Becker’s High D penny whistle, nontuneable.
Made in ivory coloured, near unbreakable, climate- impervious, polymer plumber’s pipe, its hardwood fipple block sealed with polyurethane, this hand made, lightweight, nonclogging instrument is ready for a lifetime’s use.
It is modeled on the Dr Guido Gonzato PVC whistles, with variations on hole size and placing by the whistle’s maker, James Becker, an academically qualified American musician and teacher. The very heavy chamfering of the tone holes is a unique Becker feature. You wonder if your fingers will ever get out of those declivities, but they produce finger playing accuracy and limit the possibility of air leaks, making the whistle feel comfortably reliable. The chamferings on the model reviewed however were clumsily executed, and poorly finished. There were also two tool scratches barely polished out near the air window. The cutting and finishing on the window ramp and the window itself were rough and unfinished too. The blade seemed finished crookedly. The fipple block is nicely curved and fits confidently into the lower lip, but the fipple is end grain wood and rough so doesn’t help in playing fadeouts, (morendos) when trying to gently pull the mouthpiece away from the lips. The two labels that came with the whistle look computer generated on paper rather than the usual self sticking plastic labels that are smarter and don’t come off when cleaning. They had come unglued, and had to be stuck down again with Sellotape. None of this affects the whistle voice though, which is remarkably satisfying, especially for such a low price whistle, even though it is hand made. (Becker says he is pleased to have these issues brought to his attention and is addressing them).
Performance wise, the Becker needs a lot more air than the Burke D Composite Session, which itself needs just a little more air than Dr Guido Gonzato’s whistle. The Becker is as loud as the other whistles, and is just as in tune. The octaves are perfectly balanced. The high notes are easily delivered and the octave transitions are unnoticeable. No screeching or squawking here. The Cnat presents no problems with oXXOOO.
If needed, Becker says by adjusting the moveable fipple hood one sixteenth of an inch towards your lips the lower octave is easier to play. Bringing the hood the same distance down towards the tone holes makes the higher octave easier to play, he says.
So far as tone goes, while the Burke has a cold, clear bright accuracy and the Gonzato has a cleaner, richer, warmer accuracy with some chiff, the Becker is sweet but more complex, huskier, with chiff galore. The Burke, Gonzato and Becker all have fabulous bell tones. The Becker has a lot more backpressure and needs more push than the other whistles. Before getting used to it, the Becker player will need to concentrate on breath control. (Professionals are reported to like the variation high backpressure gives).
The Becker D’s musical quality and price make it an outstanding starter whistle, one that can still be played by session, concert players and soloists even when they get to perform at Carnegie Hall, IMHO …
Also, the Becker is another example of how musically high quality, low cost whistles have arrived. Clearly, whistle problems people had to put up with in the past no longer need be tolerated or even addressed, even by tweaking.
The Burke costs $190, the Guido Gonzato $40, and the Becker $5.
Made in ivory coloured, near unbreakable, climate- impervious, polymer plumber’s pipe, its hardwood fipple block sealed with polyurethane, this hand made, lightweight, nonclogging instrument is ready for a lifetime’s use.
It is modeled on the Dr Guido Gonzato PVC whistles, with variations on hole size and placing by the whistle’s maker, James Becker, an academically qualified American musician and teacher. The very heavy chamfering of the tone holes is a unique Becker feature. You wonder if your fingers will ever get out of those declivities, but they produce finger playing accuracy and limit the possibility of air leaks, making the whistle feel comfortably reliable. The chamferings on the model reviewed however were clumsily executed, and poorly finished. There were also two tool scratches barely polished out near the air window. The cutting and finishing on the window ramp and the window itself were rough and unfinished too. The blade seemed finished crookedly. The fipple block is nicely curved and fits confidently into the lower lip, but the fipple is end grain wood and rough so doesn’t help in playing fadeouts, (morendos) when trying to gently pull the mouthpiece away from the lips. The two labels that came with the whistle look computer generated on paper rather than the usual self sticking plastic labels that are smarter and don’t come off when cleaning. They had come unglued, and had to be stuck down again with Sellotape. None of this affects the whistle voice though, which is remarkably satisfying, especially for such a low price whistle, even though it is hand made. (Becker says he is pleased to have these issues brought to his attention and is addressing them).
Performance wise, the Becker needs a lot more air than the Burke D Composite Session, which itself needs just a little more air than Dr Guido Gonzato’s whistle. The Becker is as loud as the other whistles, and is just as in tune. The octaves are perfectly balanced. The high notes are easily delivered and the octave transitions are unnoticeable. No screeching or squawking here. The Cnat presents no problems with oXXOOO.
If needed, Becker says by adjusting the moveable fipple hood one sixteenth of an inch towards your lips the lower octave is easier to play. Bringing the hood the same distance down towards the tone holes makes the higher octave easier to play, he says.
So far as tone goes, while the Burke has a cold, clear bright accuracy and the Gonzato has a cleaner, richer, warmer accuracy with some chiff, the Becker is sweet but more complex, huskier, with chiff galore. The Burke, Gonzato and Becker all have fabulous bell tones. The Becker has a lot more backpressure and needs more push than the other whistles. Before getting used to it, the Becker player will need to concentrate on breath control. (Professionals are reported to like the variation high backpressure gives).
The Becker D’s musical quality and price make it an outstanding starter whistle, one that can still be played by session, concert players and soloists even when they get to perform at Carnegie Hall, IMHO …
Also, the Becker is another example of how musically high quality, low cost whistles have arrived. Clearly, whistle problems people had to put up with in the past no longer need be tolerated or even addressed, even by tweaking.
The Burke costs $190, the Guido Gonzato $40, and the Becker $5.
- keithsandra
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:55 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: BC., Canada
www.becker.embarquespace.comGerald wrote:Does Mr. Becker have a website?
-
- Posts: 4245
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Salt Lake City
Googled James Becker whistle and got this:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4490123.html
Is this the whistle??
Susan
P.S. There's something wrong with that link, Keithsandra...it doesn't work.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4490123.html
Is this the whistle??
Susan
P.S. There's something wrong with that link, Keithsandra...it doesn't work.
- keithsandra
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:55 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: BC., Canada
I gave you a mispelled web site. The real one is : www.becker.embarqspace.comsusnfx wrote:Googled James Becker whistle and got this:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4490123.html
Is this the whistle??
Susan
P.S. There's something wrong with that link, Keithsandra...it doesn't work.
Sorry about that.
I liked the literary flavour of the whistle site you gave Susan. No doubt intended for library whistlers, bookish types anyway?
- tompipes
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:50 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: St. Louis via Dublin
- Contact:
They sound grand.
$5 you can't go wrong. They're $83 cheaper than mine but the costs are always eaten up by the time it takes to make the things. Materials are are factor too.
Mr. Becker obviously has a great set up for making these whistles that can save him time.
My 2p.
Tommy
$5 you can't go wrong. They're $83 cheaper than mine but the costs are always eaten up by the time it takes to make the things. Materials are are factor too.
Mr. Becker obviously has a great set up for making these whistles that can save him time.
Great point. He should send one to Phil Hardy. He does very honest reviews and he's a decent player too.I'd love to hear some recordings played by a skilled player...
My 2p.
Tommy
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:58 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden, "Europe"
- Contact:
Re: James Becker new whistle maker review
LOL and LOL again. Will you provide us with a recording of this splendid instrument, please?keithsandra wrote:and soloists even when they get to perform at Carnegie Hall, IMHO …
Also, the Becker is another example of how musically high quality, low cost whistles have arrived.
I think he either doesn't know about cheap whistles that have been the mainstay of whistle players the past 150 years or so or he likes to overstate things slightly more than a bit for the sake of his reviews.fearfaoin wrote: I think keithsandra's point was that these were contenders in the "cheap"
catagory. Now if the price and quality can stand the test of time remains
to be seen.
The following remark, made in an earlier post about cheap whistles informed my reaction as I believe it demonstrates a thought pattern in our writer's pieces:
on may 12 our man wrote:IMHO, it’s amazing what whistlers had to put up with before modern, low cost whistles.
Huh, yeah, that's vague. Even when I went back to look at it in context... ItPeter Laban wrote:The following remark, made in an earlier post about cheap whistles informed my reaction as I believe it demonstrates a thought pattern in our writer's pieces:
on may 12 our man wrote:IMHO, it’s amazing what whistlers had to put up with before modern, low cost whistles.
could just as easily mean "Thank God for mass-produced Generations and
Feadogs. Now we don't have to carve them from bone ourselves, anymore."
It may, loads of big words with not a lot of real content but plenty of suggestion.
On second thought though the
On second thought though the
does suggest the writer thinks a new day has dawned on whistledom with the introduction of simple pvc whistles.Keithsandra wrote:This new generation of whistles has a different musical, engineering, academic, and intellectual content.
Last edited by Cayden on Sat May 31, 2008 4:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Madpiper
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:26 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Here and there, somewhere around the middle.
While cheap as dirt whistles have been around forever, I think this statement was a shot at previous cheapies quality overall in comparison. Or maybe its because I have seen seen any low-G, D, or any low key for $8-12. I only recall ever seeing D, C and Bb's for those prices. So perhaps the statement was for that.MHO, it’s amazing what whistlers had to put up with before modern, low cost whistles.
It would have been greater than his greatest dreams, had he allowed himself any at all. -MP-