sbfluter wrote:I'm not an anthropologist or whatever you'd have to be, but it certainly seems to me that music is more commonly made by the lower classes and more commonly consumed by the upper classes. Music is typically part of class/social struggle, too. So if anyone was feeling oppressed it's likely there was music being made.
I'd have to agree with this -- I can't think of many folk tunes that came directly from classical (or Baroque) pieces, although I can think of many Baroque and classical pieces adapted from folk and dance tunes.
Look at the music America adopted and adapted from the slaves; surely, there were never less idle people on the planet, and yet, both vocal and instrumental music came out of this existence, and even when it evolved into a more sophisticated music over time, it never really lost its key ingredients that made it more African than European.
John may be right that ITM - as we know it - probably was distinctly different then from now, but I would bet the rhythms and modes used were not - and possibly some of the instrumentations, too. It makes little sense that peasant life didn't include its own heritage and culture, and this would have included music and instrumentation that evolved with a fair amount of independence from the cultural elite. Beyond that, there are clear similiarities between "Celtic" music from a variety of linguistically related countries and Ireland, whereas the relationship between these musical forms and the more upper-crust music of the same time period seems more parallel than inter-connected. Just as the Irish language held up under British rule, I suspect an inordinate amount of tunes did, too.