Just got my clarke original..
- mordred
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:53 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Bari, Italy
Just got my clarke original..
.. and i like it very much!
I especially like the fact that the second octave is not much louder than the first and it's not required a lot of pressure to flip into it. But the thing I like most is the chiffy, airy sound that the whistle produces.. I don't know, to me sounds like the sound of tradition
I especially like the fact that the second octave is not much louder than the first and it's not required a lot of pressure to flip into it. But the thing I like most is the chiffy, airy sound that the whistle produces.. I don't know, to me sounds like the sound of tradition
- Whitmores75087
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Dundalk, Ireland (now living in TX)
- Contact:
- Steamwalker
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:42 pm
- antispam: No
The Clarkes are known for that airy sound. The original D I have is easily the most comfortable on the lip of any of my whistles although the NPL (Notes Per Lungful) factor for it, well... sucks (easily half of what I get from most other whistles). The Sweetone that I have is similar in tone, but doesn't require as much air. Either way, the Clarkes have the sweetest tone from what I have played, almost flute-like.
Last edited by Steamwalker on Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pipersgrip
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:43 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Land-of-Sky
but it is great for practicing with your lungs that is a great whistle, it was my first.mordred wrote:exactly.. that's the only bad thing.. and add that i still need to learn when and how to breath efficiently..Whitmores75087 wrote: A: they can suck a lot of wind out of you.
"In prayer, it is better to have a heart without words, than words without a heart." John Bunyan
- hathair_bláth
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:54 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: The Sunny Florida Coast
I just got my first Clarke Original, too. I've been playing mostly on a Feadog, and I was shocked at how much air the Original sucks out of you! A song that I can whip through on the Feadog takes almost twice as many breaths on the Clarke. It has a really nice tone when you fill it up, though. I call it a winner.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 6:09 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Clark
I once played the Lark in the Morning on a Clarke in the Morning. It was pretty surreal.benbrad wrote:I love the sound of a Clarke in the morning . . . . it sounds like victory.
I love Clarkes too. And those Cooperman ripoffs could be a lot worse Though I'm moving back to the Generation/Feadog type, mostly 'cause of the air requirement, yeah. It's not too tiring, but I'm not at a level where I can find that many good spots to breathe without killing the lift of a tune. Same reason I don't play trad on my flute much (though it's actually quite a bit better).
- Kerry
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Frederick, MD
I realize that due to their design Clarke Original's inherently require more air, but I think it needs to be pointed out to those put off by the "high air requirerment" that it also depends on the player. One of my other hobbies is distance running, so I have never had a problem with the amount of air required to play a Clarke - and a good thing too since to my ear's you can't beat the sound - especially for ~$10.
- cavefish
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:22 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: been out of it for awhile and decided to start back up on the flute and whistle , been doing NAFs and saxophones
- Location: San Pedro
in tune tooKerry wrote:I realize that due to their design Clarke Original's inherently require more air, but I think it needs to be pointed out to those put off by the "high air requirerment" that it also depends on the player. One of my other hobbies is distance running, so I have never had a problem with the amount of air required to play a Clarke - and a good thing too since to my ear's you can't beat the sound - especially for ~$10.
- falkbeer
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:52 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
As with the Generation whistle, the "quality" varies a little from whistle to whistle. They are hand made, and not exatly the same. Even though the individual differences are minute. It maight therefore be a good idea to buy a batch and pick out the best. A really good Clarke is a gem! And, if I may add, I´m the very proud owner of one! (even though I tend to get dizzy from playing it...) It´s very good for slow airs.
If I'm not mistaken, you can reduce the air requirements some by flattening the airway and bend the blade around to tweak it. There's been several threads on tweating Clarke's. Because the metal bends, the tweaking is reversable, up to a point. Buy a handful and have some fun. If you destroy one, do what I do: I put it in a box on the top shelf of my closet; they will give my kids something to do after the wake.Whitmores75087 wrote:B: Because the metal is so thin and bendable, I'm always tempted to make adjustments to them. In fact I adjusted on today at lunch hour. I've destroyed a couple this way.
The Walrus
What would a wild walrus whistle if a walrus could whistle wild?
The second mouse may get the cheese but the presentation leaves a lot to be desired.
What would a wild walrus whistle if a walrus could whistle wild?
The second mouse may get the cheese but the presentation leaves a lot to be desired.