Flute Density Data

The Chiff & Fipple Irish Flute on-line community. Sideblown for your protection.
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Flute Density Data

Post by Doug_Tipple »

There are many ways to compare the materials that are commonly used for making flutes, such as density, hardness, strength and durability, appearance, etc. With regard to Irish flutes the most common materials are the hardwoods (maple, rosewood, cocuswood, boxwood, African blackwood, ironwood, and others) and various polymers, including pvc and delrin. Material density is an important physical property for these materials, as higher density materials are thought to have good acoustic properties. Anyway, searching around on the internet, I have assembled a short table of material densities. Please keep in mind that water is the standard for density, and by definition the density of water is 1.00 or one gram per cubic centimeter. Therefore, materials with a density less than 1.00 will float on water.

Maple, density .75 g/cc.
African ebony, density .96 – 1.12 g/cc.
Ironwood, density 1.22-1.28 g/cc.
PVC (poly vinyl chloride), density 1.38 g/cc.
Delrin, density 1.41 g/cc.

My motivation for doing the above search was to attempt to support my contention that polymer flutes compared very favorably with flutes made from the finest hardwoods in terms of material density. But, like I mentioned before, density is only one of the important qualities of a good flute-making material.

Comparing PVC and Delrin (Acetal):
PVC, density 1.38, Rockwell hardness R112, water absorption = .10% in 24 hours
Delrin, density 1.41, Rockwell hardness R120, water absorption = .25% in 24 hours

Please feel free to add or correct any data on this list.
Last edited by Doug_Tipple on Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
I.D.10-t
Posts: 7660
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:57 am
antispam: No
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA, Earth

Post by I.D.10-t »

Just for fun,

Aluminium 2.70 g/cc
Glass 2.1-5.5 g/cc
Ceramic 2.8-6 g/cc
Titanium 4.506 g/cc
Iron 7.86 g/cc
Silver 10.49 g/cc
Lead 11.34 g/cc
Gold 19.3 g/cc
Tungsten 19.25 g/cc
Platinum 21.45 g/cc

I must say that some of the numbers surprised me.

Rockwell hardness can change due to small additions of other elements and processing of metals, so I did not look for it.
Last edited by I.D.10-t on Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Be not deceived by the sweet words of proverbial philosophy. Sugar of lead is a poison."
User avatar
Easily_Deluded_Fool
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: The space between thoughts.

Re: Flute Density Data

Post by Easily_Deluded_Fool »

Doug_Tipple wrote:... like I mentioned before, density in only one of the important qualities of a good flute-making material.

Please feel free to add or correct any data on this list.

No mention of the density of the player :D
No whistles were harmed in the transmission of this communication.
User avatar
Jack Bradshaw
Posts: 933
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 2:49 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Hampstead, NH
Contact:

Re: Flute Density Data

Post by Jack Bradshaw »

Easily_Deluded_Fool wrote:
Doug_Tipple wrote:... like I mentioned before, density in only one of the important qualities of a good flute-making material.

Please feel free to add or correct any data on this list.

No mention of the density of the player :D

:oops: :oops:

The parameter of interest is actually the acoustic impedance wrt air....usually goes up w/ density and hardness...the higher it is the less loss to the wall from pressure fluctuations......porosity enters here as well

There are also the viscous and thermal wall losses to consider so the smoothness and thermal conductivity come into play........
603/329-7322
"I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ... "
User avatar
cocusflute
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:15 pm

Flute...?

Post by cocusflute »

So would a flute of higher density be better? Why not a conical flute made of metal then- like one of Michael Copeland's whistles?
User avatar
Wormdiet
Posts: 2575
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:17 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: GreenSliabhs

Re: Flute...?

Post by Wormdiet »

cocusflute wrote:So would a flute of higher density be better? Why not a conical flute made of metal then- like one of Michael Copeland's whistles?
I've wondered that myself. Maybe because the sound of cylindrical flute was seen as preferable for classical music? (Not trying to be flip here, but serious.) I would also suspect that a metal conical flute is harder to make than a cylinder. (But then again, saxophones. . .. )

Didnt Terry post about a conical metal flute that had been designed to use in tropical colonies where a cocus flute wouldn't be happy? (No pun intended!)
OOOXXO
Doing it backwards since 2005.
User avatar
Jayhawk
Posts: 3905
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Well, just trying to update my avatar after a decade. Hope this counts! Ok, so apparently I must babble on longer.
Location: Lawrence, KS
Contact:

Post by Jayhawk »

The conical metal flute Terry referred to was Clinton's flute for India or something similar.

I still want one...but no one seems to be sending free ones my way.

Eric
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Flute...?

Post by Doug_Tipple »

cocusflute wrote:So would a flute of higher density be better? Why not a conical flute made of metal then- like one of Michael Copeland's whistles?
To answer your question, yes, I personally think that a wooden flute made from African blackwood would sound "better" than an identical flute made from a less-dense wood, such as oak, walnut or maple. However, others on this board would argue that it shouldn't make any difference what type of material that the flute was made from. There have been long threads about this topic here at C & F.

I am not familiar with Michael Copeland's conical whistles, but I think that most conical metal whistles are made pretty much like a tin whistle with a simple taper along the length of the whistle. Most wooden flutes, on the other hand, have a more complex conical bore. The same kind of construction would be much more difficult with metal, where it is ideal to have a thin wall in order to keep down the weight of the flute. Ideally, if you could make a thin-wall metal flute with a complex conical bore, I think that it most likely would sound good. For the reasons already mentioned, I don't think that you will see many metal flutes made like this.
User avatar
I.D.10-t
Posts: 7660
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:57 am
antispam: No
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA, Earth

Post by I.D.10-t »

Jayhawk wrote:The conical metal flute Terry referred to was Clinton's flute for India or something similar.

I still want one...but no one seems to be sending free ones my way.

Eric
This one.

The raised finger holes are a nice touch, the key work is a fairly original design (read the article). No worries of cracking.
Doug_Tipple wrote:Ideally, if you could make a thin-wall metal flute with a complex conical bore, I think that it most likely would sound good. For the reasons already mentioned, I don't think that you will see many metal flutes made like this.
Michael Copeland’soriginal method was to make a mandrill and pound the sheet metal down with a rawhide mallet and then press it through a lead doughnut. Unless there is a flair at the end of the flute, it might be possible, with little additional effort, to make a non-conical mandrill and form a body that way. Making the head with raised lip plate would probably be the as difficult.
"Be not deceived by the sweet words of proverbial philosophy. Sugar of lead is a poison."
User avatar
Bart Wijnen
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Leeuwarden, the Netherlands

Re: Flute...?

Post by Bart Wijnen »

Doug_Tipple wrote:
cocusflute wrote:So would a flute of higher density be better? Why not a conical flute made of metal then- like one of Michael Copeland's whistles?
To answer your question, yes, I personally think that a wooden flute made from African blackwood would sound "better" than an identical flute made from a less-dense wood, such as oak, walnut or maple. However, others on this board would argue that it shouldn't make any difference what type of material that the flute was made from. There have been long threads about this topic here at C & F.
If a flute of higher density automatically would sound better, then the platinum boehm-flute (used for Varèse's 'Density 21.5') would sound best. I have a record with Rampal playing on it and - though I normally love the man's tone - I can't get very enthousiastic about it.

And Doug (or anybody else), please help me on this one: is the difference between polymer and PVC/Delrin the same as between metal and silver/gold? If so, is a M&E polymer flute thus made of PVC.

Mine doesn't float btw. :lol:
Bart
User avatar
Jayhawk
Posts: 3905
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Well, just trying to update my avatar after a decade. Hope this counts! Ok, so apparently I must babble on longer.
Location: Lawrence, KS
Contact:

Post by Jayhawk »

I can answer one of your question Bart...the M&E is made of PVC. It's food grade PVC that comes in rod stock and is then machined just like a normal wooden flute. Delrin is acetal - a different polymer product.

Obviously, they're very similar, and from my experience playing flutes made of both materials - both accoustically good.

Eric
User avatar
Bart Wijnen
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Leeuwarden, the Netherlands

Post by Bart Wijnen »

Thanks Eric!

That answered my question, except for the fact that my dictionary fails on 'food grade'. :)
Bart
User avatar
Sillydill
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:33 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Edge of Misery (Missouri) KC area

Mahillon

Post by Sillydill »

I was going to save this for a thread of my own, but think it is applicable here.

The following is a summary translation by Jack’s hero John Coltman (Yes, the concrete flute guy). He translated an original manuscript by Charles Victor Mahillon (prominent Belgian instrument manufacturer around the turn of the 19th century). The following links are to the scanned pages from Coltman’s book.

The gist of the summarized translation is that Mahillon made a wooden trumpet (bugle). He then took it all over the world and did the behind curtains test of having someone play his brass and wooden trumpets.

Seems that no one could tell the difference. :D


Image

Image

Image

I think I will probably repost these images in a separate thread later, to follow with my own conclusion.



All the Best!

Jordan
Last edited by Sillydill on Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Guinness
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:16 pm

Re: Flute Density Data

Post by Guinness »

Doug_Tipple wrote:Material density is an important physical property for these materials, as higher density materials are thought to have good acoustic properties.
What are "good acoustic properties"? For example, Sitka spruce is favored for guitar tops and its density is much lower than the hardwoods:

http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_wood.htm
User avatar
Jack Bradshaw
Posts: 933
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 2:49 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Hampstead, NH
Contact:

Post by Jack Bradshaw »

Good stuff Jordan !!!!! :o

"Good" acoustical properties are in the ear of the beholder.....
603/329-7322
"I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ... "
Post Reply