For the Beginner Who Asks: Why Can't I Play Faster?

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
User avatar
FJohnSharp
Posts: 3050
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I used to be a regular then I took up the bassoon. Bassoons don't have a lot of chiff. Not really, I have always been a drummer, and my C&F years were when I was a little tired of the drums. Now I'm back playing drums. I mist the C&F years, though.
Location: Kent, Ohio

Post by FJohnSharp »

Peter Laban wrote: Thepoint that few types of music play as fast as the speed of an average reel is ludricous in itself.

There is no reason why anybody wouldn't be able to play in a decent manner, given they put a bit of work in. Thousands of people of all ages seem to manage, why not you guys? Just take it handy and work at it, you may surprise yourself although it won't come in weeks or months. If you don't start deluding yourself you won't have to work at it because you'll never be any good anyway you'll not get anywhere.
They play reels at my session at about 210, which is not really fast by many standards, but I can only play two tunes that fast--Silver spear and Sally Gardens. I can play snippits of other tunes--like the A part to St Anne's reel or the opening to Dick Gossip's--at that speed. I can play them all at much slower speed, but not that speed. But it's taking me a long time to make progress on any other reels.
"Meon an phobail a thogail trid an chultur"
(The people’s spirit is raised through culture)


Suburban Symphony
User avatar
Loren
Posts: 8393
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: You just slip out the back, Jack
Make a new plan, Stan
You don't need to be coy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Hop on the bus, Gus
You don't need to discuss much
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
Location: Loren has left the building.

Post by Loren »

Great story Phil. Oh how I can relate........


http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?p=mou ... 8%26b%3D21




Loren
User avatar
brewerpaul
Posts: 7300
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

Post by brewerpaul »

shadeclan wrote:
brewerpaul wrote: Some areas have "slow sessions" where newer players are catered to. See if you can find one of those. I used to go to one session where the first hour was slow (although the pace used to creep up) then the better players would show up and kick things into higher gear.\
If you can't find a slow session, maybe you could start one.
Actually Mike (slowair) and I have been kicking around the idea of having a little session at lunch, since we work less than a mile apart from each other - that is, if he ever gets back to me about it. . .

In other words: Mike, check your PM's
Keep me posted too. If I'm free I might be convinced to make the trek to Albany, maybe bring an octave mando for variety.
Got wood?
http://www.Busmanwhistles.com
Let me custom make one for you!
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

Well, I think you answered yourself Peter ol' chap. No longer should you be puzzled over the phrase "session speed", especially when used by US players. We just play the tunes faster in session.
No, it shows there no such thing as 'sessionspeed' because this shows that while some people play ridiculously fast, others prefer not to. And fast=exciting? Remember the old:
“… it was never simple-hearted enough to speak plainly, and so, intensely. It therefore
dazzles us rather than moves us.”
User avatar
Bloomfield
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Location: Location:

Post by Bloomfield »

"... if that's a lament I'd like to hear them when they're jolly." ;)
/Bloomfield
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

I think I already conceeded that faster != better.
│& ¼║: ♪♪♫♪ ♫♪♫♪ :║
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

Bloomfield wrote:"... if that's a lament I'd like to hear them when they're jolly." ;)
Exactly, just a jumble of..nothing, for whom the cap fits and we all know a few don't we ;-)
srt19170
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 6:00 pm

Post by srt19170 »

Peter Laban wrote: In my experience good sessions are rarely 'very fast'.
I'm trying to picture the speed in a session Peter would consider very fast :-).

Being very, very good at something skews your viewpoint. I'm one (or at least was) of the best programmers in the world. My team won the World Programming Championship back in the 80s. To me, programming was like breathing, and it seemed to me that with a little effort, anyone could be a decent programmer.

Then I taught programming to college undergraduates for a few years. Young, bright, motivated kids with plenty of time to devote to learning.
Turned out, even for the above-average student, programming is not so easy to learn.

Oh, it wasn't impossible. I'd say anyone of average intelligence can learn to be a decent programmer. But will they master it in six months of part-time effort? No. Will they ever be as good as I was? For most people, no. For whatever reason, I'm blessed with the right tools to be an exceptional programmer.

So while I respect Peter enormously, I think his view on this topic is a little skewed by his own tremendous skills and experience. And because of self-selection, this skewing tends to be pervasive in the traditional music scene. For example, it's common wisdom that everyone can and should learn tunes by ear. However, about half of the adult population is tone deaf, and about a quarter of the population cannot even distinguish between two notes a semi-tone apart. Sure, all the session regulars have no problem learning by ear, but that's not because everyone can do it. It's because the ones who can't have been weeded out.

My point is that if you're new to the music you need to take the advice and wisdom from the "wise old men" with a bit of salt. Understand that these are often the people with best skills and the best experience for the music, and recognize that you don't have to (and probably won't) measure up to their expectations.

-- Scott
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

Mitch at OzWHistles has conveniently put a few bits on-line I would not consider very fast while still very acceptable : reel and jig .

I wouldn't consider Seamus Ennis' clip above very fast either, it really doesn't need to be if you have rhythm and lift.
User avatar
dfernandez77
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 11:09 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: So, please write a little about why you are interested. We're just looking for something that will make it clear to us, when we read it, why you are registering and that you know what this forum is all about.
Location: US.CA.Tustin

Post by dfernandez77 »

Wanderer wrote:... faster != better.
Regular expressions in a whistle discussion?

You need to write a tune entitled All your base are belong to us. :)
Daniel

It's my opinion - highly regarded (and sometimes not) by me. Peace y'all.
User avatar
malanstevenson
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've been playing the uilleann pipes, flute and whistle for about 18 years or so. I've been listening to Irish and Scottish traditional music for almost 40 years now.
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain
Contact:

Post by malanstevenson »

Quote:
Well, I think you answered yourself Peter ol' chap. No longer should you be puzzled over the phrase "session speed", especially when used by US players. We just play the tunes faster in session.


No, it shows there no such thing as 'sessionspeed' because this shows that while some people play ridiculously fast, others prefer not to.
Peter, I think what Wanderer was getting at is just that the expectations of listeners and players alike are that diddley-dee needs to be very fast to be good - and for that we can thank (on a - literally- accelerating curve as we move through time) the likes of The Bothy Band, De Danann, Altan, Dervish, etc., since that flat-out group sound is what many folks are first exposed to and wind up trying to emulate in their playing in a group context. The pace and approach to tunes as played in Kitty's kitchen is something many are likely rarely exposed to in most places (hereabouts included).

Personally, I have the toughest time playing reels well either fast or slow(er), as I seem to want to 'swing' many of them to the point they almost sound like hornpipes, or fluctuate between that and more flat-out playing (depending on the tune and the instrument - pipes, whistle or flute). The easiest way for me to come to grips with them is to start playing it as a slow reel, get a feel for the 'music' of the tune, experiment with variations, and then gradually speed it up until I reach the point where all that musicality starts to fall apart, pushing it a bit farther each time or just leaving the speed alone, depending on how I've got the tune in my head. With greater speed it eventually starts to become a different tune of course, exhibiting an entirely different character and appeal (or not) all its own, but it can also just get ridiculous and mechanical and the tune becomes a parody of itself, as often happens in sessions where someone starts it too fast.


Mark
User avatar
StevieJ
Posts: 2189
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Old hand, active in the early 2000s. Less active in recent years but still lurking from time to time.
Location: Montreal

Post by StevieJ »

Peter, you really ought to get out more. :wink:

Anyway all this discussion of how fast sessions are or ought to be is a diversion from the original point. Um, what was it again?

Oh yeah I think some of this has to do with the age at which you take up your first instrument and something to do with physical tension. I've seen many enthusiastic people of 40 and over take up Irish music on a first instrument at the school I used to teach at, and heard quite a few of them complain that after a few years' hard work, speed just wasn't coming to them. And I'm not talking about anything I would call remotely fast. Others didn't complain, but... it all seemed like such hard work. After a few years of this teaching I got to the stage where I would try hard to disabuse adult beginners of any expectations they might have before accepting them as fiddle students.

On the other hand those that have played other instruments, especially as children, do much better. I don't know what it's all about - neural pathways established in childhood, the adult's thinking mind interfering with the body, or what. You wouldn't think that the whistle could cause people problems but it can.

Another thing to consider, apart from chronic tension that settles upon us with the stresses of life, is the general temporary level of tension that our workaday existence imposes on us. I remember fondly what would happen to me, back in my fiddle playing days, after a week of sessions at a festival - or even a weekend bash with the chance to play in a relaxed but stimulating atmosphere for 10 or 15 hours over a couple of days. All the systems would wake up, the cares of the working week would melt away, and I could play what seemed like three times faster and better than in real life, surprising myself and others.
Brian Boru
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:52 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Saskatoon

Post by Brian Boru »

Loren wrote:Great story Phil. Oh how I can relate........


http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?p=mou ... 8%26b%3D21




Loren
Ok... so that explains the Mountain Dew obsession I have noticed on this site. Its all about speed...
User avatar
monkey587
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:56 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Tulsa, OK

Post by monkey587 »

There are a lot of people caught up in the idea that it takes forever to learn to play in sessions. So they go to "slow sessions" with the hopes that if they get 1bpm faster each time, then 45 years down the road, they'll be able to play in "real" session. While the slow practice idea is really important, at some point you just need to take the leapor you'll second-guess yourself out of ever getting there.

Don't be afraid of sessions. If you're not nearly up to it, go to listen to get a feel for the music. If you're getting closer to it, play quietly and try to match the rhythm of the other players (assuming that rhythm is good). You'll get there if you're willing to listen.

I used to teach guitar, and I found that most of the players who "couldn't get it" mostly couldn't get it because of self-defeating attitudes.
William Bajzek
User avatar
Bloomfield
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Location: Location:

Post by Bloomfield »

monkey587 wrote:Don't be afraid of sessions. If you're not nearly up to it, go to listen to get a feel for the music. If you're getting closer to it, play quietly and try to match the rhythm of the other players (assuming that rhythm is good). You'll get there if you're willing to listen.
I think that's right. I don't think people go to sessions enough to just listen. It's really important and if you are there week after week for a few months, listening and watching the scene, chances are you'll have a sense of how people behave and treat each other in that session. It seems inconceivable to me how someone could show up at a session for the first time to play. If someone says "I am not interested in listening to the music, I only want to play it." They aren't ready for the music, let alone sessions.
/Bloomfield
Post Reply