Too-Thin models banned from Madrid fashion show

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Redwolf
Posts: 6051
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Somewhere in the Western Hemisphere

Post by Redwolf »

peeplj wrote:
The Weekenders wrote:Well, it may or may not be that plumper people face health issues, but it would be nice to eliminate stress from social pressure to be skinny as a risk factor.
True.

I offer a quote from C.S. Lewis:
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences.
--James
Amen.

Redwolf
...agus déanfaidh mé do mholadh ar an gcruit a Dhia, a Dhia liom!
User avatar
cowtime
Posts: 5280
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Appalachian Mts.

Post by cowtime »

missy wrote:for the majority of my life, I was (as far as any chart was concerned) underweight. I was also perfectly healthy. My dad was small, my mom is small, and while my kids have gotten a lot taller than anyone else in the family, they are still skinny (Nate actually didn't weigh ENOUGH to pass his Navy physical, but they went ahead and accepted him because he had 6 months before actually going to basic).

My metabolism basically stopped when I hit age 40. I feel like I'm overweight, although I'm now "normal" on all the charts.

I have a huge history of Type 2 diabetes in my family, including being gestational diabetic myself during both pregnancies. And all of my relatives were what you would term "skinny".

What I'm basically saying is all those "charts" don't mean a thing unless you also look at health history, family history, body type, bone mass, etc.

I agreee. I too have always been "skinny". The most I ever weighed was 125 and that was when I was pregnant 29 years ago. My Dad was thin and so is most of his family. We're just a scrawny bunch.
Of course I loved it in the 60's when Twiggy was the height of fashion. (I looked like that)

My theory is that everyone is supposed to be a certain normal weight for them. For some it is thin, for some thick. As long as they feel good and are healthy there should be no problem.
"Let low-country intruder approach a cove
And eyes as gray as icicle fangs measure stranger
For size, honesty, and intent."
John Foster West
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Doug_Tipple »

In my youthful adventures in the desert outposts of Southern Arizona in the late sixties, I met a hard-rock miner named Pete Espinosa. Pete was fond of big women. Ginger, his partner, lived with him in their little mining trailer near the Mexican border. I was a refugee from the north, trying to find a quiet place to get my head straight in the middle of the Vietnam War. I remember it clearly. It was a cold night, and he explained it to me this way, "Only God could love a skinny woman on a night like this." I don't know why, but I took his advise to heart. As another acquaintence of mind was fond of saying, "A hint to the wise is sufficient".
User avatar
peeplj
Posts: 9029
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
Contact:

Post by peeplj »

I had a great-uncle named John Bottoms. He took a very large woman to wife.

He was made fun of by nearly everyone in the small town of Antoine, Arkansas.

One day, when the local Methodist minister (John Bottoms, himself, being Church of Christ) was asking him if he new the story of Jack Spratt--

Jack Spratt could eat no fat,
His wife could eat no lean
And so it was betwixt them both
They licked the platter clean

--and John Bottoms looked the minister in the eye, and recalling that the minister's wife was quite thin, told him "Preacher, when you go home at night, you sleep on the springs; I sleep on a soft feather bed." :lol: :D

--James
http://www.flutesite.com

-------
"Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending" --Carl Bard
User avatar
anniemcu
Posts: 8024
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:42 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: A little left of center, and 100 miles from St. Louis
Contact:

Post by anniemcu »

Excellente!
anniemcu
---
"You are what you do, not what you claim to believe." -Gene A. Statler
---
"Olé to you, none-the-less!" - Elizabeth Gilbert
---
http://www.sassafrassgrove.com
User avatar
Lambchop
Posts: 5768
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:10 pm
antispam: No
Location: Florida

Post by Lambchop »

OK, I hear you talking, but what I want to know is . . . exactly where are all these men who love fluffy women??? :-?
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Post by Wombat »

brewerpaul wrote: As the husband of a wonderful, formerly plus size wife (down 80 lb post gastric bypass and still dropping), my consciousness about weight issues has really been raised. What I want to know is, who exactly are these designers trying to appeal to? Speaking as a guy, I find these emaciated looking models unappealing in the extreme! Most men I've ever talked to agree.
I'm sure women don't diet because they think men like emaciated women. Plenty of people must have said it before, but I'm sure women don't dress to appeal to men, either. The whole fashion thing is, I think, about women dressing to get a reaction from other women. Men don't even know anything about men's fashion. They have to be told what's fashionable by their wives, girfriends or, if they're really desparate, their mommas. Fashion has absolutely nothing to do with men, ..... apart from a few gay guys.
User avatar
scottielvr
Posts: 1348
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: NC mountains

Post by scottielvr »

I agree generally, Wombat...but although "fashion" may indeed not be "for men," and women may not dress for "men", we may occasionally be seized by an irrational compulsion to dress for "a man." A subtle distinction... (E.g., I will never believe that high heels were invented by women). :wink:

I'm long past all that nonsense myself, of course.
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Post by Wombat »

scottielvr wrote:I agree generally, Wombat...but although "fashion" may indeed not be "for men," and women may not dress for "men", we may occasionally be seized by an irrational compulsion to dress for "a man." A subtle distinction... (E.g., I will never believe that high heels were invented by women). :wink:

I'm long past all that nonsense myself, of course.
A subtle but important distinction, scottie. I have no objection to being 'dressed for' by a certain woman, but I stop short of requesting high heels, even though I know what they are for.
User avatar
peeplj
Posts: 9029
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
Contact:

Post by peeplj »

Lambchop wrote:OK, I hear you talking, but what I want to know is . . . exactly where are all these men who love fluffy women??? :-?
All over the place.

I am one...of course, I am taken. :wink:

I have two close friends who also, in your words, prefer fluffy women.

I also know several other men who do--many of them work in the I.T. industry. I think that's because we tend to have less prejudice in general than John Q. Public does. I think there are two likely reasons: I.T. tends to attract people who are both intelligent and nonconformist; also, years of communicating with each other by typing in text-only mediums (like chat, for instance) have made us very inclusive rather than very exclusive. When a common topic of debate, for instance, is whether dolphins have souls and should be considered "human," (since they are intelligent and use language), the differences between a thin woman and a fluffy one really start to seem pretty insignificant.

My advice--befriend the folks who work with computers. You never know what might happen--but friends are always a Good Thing in their own right.

--James

P.S. a minor clarification: I like women in general, not just the fluffy ones.
http://www.flutesite.com

-------
"Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending" --Carl Bard
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

Lambchop wrote:OK, I hear you talking, but what I want to know is . . . exactly where are all these men who love fluffy women??? :-?
Holds up both hands and jumps up and down

There've been several cutie pie threads where I've said, "She's too thin" (Andrea Corr, Rachel Rey), I wasn't joking. And I really do think Cass Elliot was hot.

A new single woman rolled into our office space like a little beachball and I have to force myself away from that cubicle (more like five beachballs put together just so). I'm too married. Ironically to a thin woman.

I guess it just goes to show there's someone for everyone.


But that's not what I wanted to post about. I wanted to post about the definition of obesity vs fat vs plump and so on. But never mind.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
dfernandez77
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 11:09 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: So, please write a little about why you are interested. We're just looking for something that will make it clear to us, when we read it, why you are registering and that you know what this forum is all about.
Location: US.CA.Tustin

Post by dfernandez77 »

I've always preferred session bore over narrow bore. :D
Daniel

It's my opinion - highly regarded (and sometimes not) by me. Peace y'all.
User avatar
anniemcu
Posts: 8024
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:42 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: A little left of center, and 100 miles from St. Louis
Contact:

Post by anniemcu »

A good early date that will separate the real men from the 'just a guy's ... watch the movie "Shallow Hal"
anniemcu
---
"You are what you do, not what you claim to believe." -Gene A. Statler
---
"Olé to you, none-the-less!" - Elizabeth Gilbert
---
http://www.sassafrassgrove.com
User avatar
Loren
Posts: 8393
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: You just slip out the back, Jack
Make a new plan, Stan
You don't need to be coy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Hop on the bus, Gus
You don't need to discuss much
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
Location: Loren has left the building.

Post by Loren »

Flyingcursor wrote:There've been several cutie pie threads where I've said, "She's too thin" (Andrea Corr, Rachel Rey), I wasn't joking.
Hmm, Rachel Ray is not thin. I'm not suggesting she's heavy, but she is certainly not thin. Interesting.


Loren
User avatar
peeplj
Posts: 9029
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
Contact:

Post by peeplj »

Flyingcursor wrote:But that's not what I wanted to post about. I wanted to post about the definition of obesity vs fat vs plump and so on.
I'm not sure there's a difference in the definition of these terms; the difference is more in when each is used. "Obesity" is considered a medical term, and as such has a more exact definition (though currently under debate as to the particulars); "fat" is a very generic term and can also be a very insulting term if used in certain ways or in a certain tone of voice; words like "plump" and "fluffy" tend to be used either when someone is trying to be very careful to not insult someone, or they are also sometimes used to denote someone who is pleasantly overweight.

A note on the term "fat:" people who advocate fat acceptance (and I am one of them, in case you haven't figured that out yet) are working to reclaim the word fat as being an OK word. Fat is something that I am in much the same way that male is something that I am; I make no apologies for either, and there is no need to call me anything else in either case.

--James
http://www.flutesite.com

-------
"Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending" --Carl Bard
Post Reply