Spillane Low D: 2006 Update

emmline · Post by **emmline** » Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:43 am

I wonder if Jerry could tweak the existing Spillane.
Imagine the value!
OTOH, since there's only the one, (as far as we know,) perhaps it would be like adding proper perspective to a Grandma Moses painting.
Not done. But the idea appeals to me.

dfernandez77 · Post by **dfernandez77** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:52 pm

brewerpaul wrote:I'm sorry, I'm locking this thread...

hehe!

Mr.Nate · Post by **Mr.Nate** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:40 am

Dale,

I thought you were in contact with spillane's marketing manager? You should be giving us an update of how the big project (spoof) is going!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Q: Did Bloomfield ever really own a Spilane whistle or did he just take a picture of a Howard as a joke? He is laughing about it at this very minute!

Loren · Post by **Loren** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:59 am

I don't believe Bloomfield really exists: I think he is simply an artifact created and planted by someone in advance, to provide a review of the whistle at the proper moment.

Mulder, Scully - do you concur?

Bloomfield · Post by **Bloomfield** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:39 am

Loren wrote:I don't believe Bloomfield really exists: I think he is simply an artifact created and planted by someone in advance, to provide a review of the whistle at the proper moment.

Mulder, Scully - do you concur?

I post therefore I am.

Denny · Post by **Denny** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:18 am

Bloomfield wrote:
Loren wrote:I don't believe Bloomfield really exists: I think he is simply an artifact created and planted by someone in advance, to provide a review of the whistle at the proper moment.

Mulder, Scully - do you concur?
I post therefore I am.

Ah, you was...

emmline · Post by **emmline** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:36 am

Bloomfield wrote:
Loren wrote:I don't believe Bloomfield really exists: I think he is simply an artifact created and planted by someone in advance, to provide a review of the whistle at the proper moment.

Mulder, Scully - do you concur?
I post therefore I am.

Don't let this fool you. Or go ahead and let it. I don't care. But, as Walrus astutely observed a page ago--those grainy photos from the NE Chiff gathering prove nothing. And you must absolutely not be misled by those reports of Bloomie at the Roswell Renaissance and Cosmic Radiation Fest.
It was a ploy to sell more Bloomfield car air fresheners. The fact that I have one hanging from my rear-view mirror should not be construed as a sign that I believe.

PhilO · Post by **PhilO** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:52 pm

I was at the NE Whistle Gathering and witnessed the so called Bloomfield sighting. Being highly suspicious of the aura emanating from the thing, Tom Dowling and I (bravely) charged at it, ran right through it, thereby proving once and for all that it was merely a hologram. We most heartily, therefore, concur with the astute findings of the great Detective Bookbinder - there is no living breathing Bloomfield.

Philo

Post by **Dale** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:31 pm

emmline wrote:
Bloomfield wrote:
Loren wrote:I don't believe Bloomfield really exists: I think he is simply an artifact created and planted by someone in advance, to provide a review of the whistle at the proper moment.

Mulder, Scully - do you concur?
I post therefore I am.
Don't let this fool you. Or go ahead and let it. I don't care. But, as Walrus astutely observed a page ago--those grainy photos from the NE Chiff gathering prove nothing. And you must absolutely not be misled by those reports of Bloomie at the Roswell Renaissance and Cosmic Radiation Fest.
It was a ploy to sell more Bloomfield car air fresheners. The fact that I have one hanging from my rear-view mirror should not be construed as a sign that I believe.

I met the guy. Ate dinner with him. He had tomato soup. Or....at least he SAID he was Bloomfield. And....at least it LOOKED like tomato soup.

jsluder · Post by **jsluder** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:56 pm

I suspect Bloomfield is like the character "Saskia" who appears in some of Charles de Lint's fiction. (A literary research and library web site becomes sentient and decides to create a life for itself outside the WWW, hence "Saskia" is born.)

Bloomfield · Post by **Bloomfield** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:29 pm

I refuse to prove that I exist, for proof denies faith. And without faith I am nothing.

Congratulations · Post by **Congratulations** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:34 pm

Bloomfield wrote:I refuse to prove that I exist, for proof denies faith. And without faith I am nothing.

Wait...

Unseen122 · Post by **Unseen122** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:53 pm

PhilO wrote:I was at the NE Whistle Gathering and witnessed the so called Bloomfield sighting. Being highly suspicious of the aura emanating from the thing, Tom Dowling and I (bravely) charged at it, ran right through it, thereby proving once and for all that it was merely a hologram. We most heartily, therefore, concur with the astute findings of the great Detective Bookbinder - there is no living breathing Bloomfield.

Philo

Let me guess, when this happened I was on my way and stuck in traffic? I remember he left right after I got there, I could be a Bloom Buster.

Tyghress · Post by **Tyghress** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:07 pm

Bloomfield does indeed exist. I can vouch for him.

It occurs to me to that having a purported Cat vouching for a Bloomfield is sort of like having a six foot rabbit vouching for the existence of a wino, but there you have it.

Denny · Post by **Denny** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:17 pm