NEW BOARD POLICY: Moderated Discussion

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
izzarina
Posts: 6759
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 8:17 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Limbo
Contact:

Post by izzarina »

Nanohedron wrote:When in doubt, people, PM. It's easy.
Just don't tell us all to PMS. It may be easy but it's not all that fun
User avatar
Azalin
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Montreal, Canada
Contact:

Post by Azalin »

Loren wrote:Anybody here actually have a job?

Loren
I'm more worried about this guy in San Francisco who can't post 12 000 messages per day now that the Political thread is on hold. What is he doin'?
User avatar
Joseph E. Smith
Posts: 13780
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
antispam: No
Location: ... who cares?...
Contact:

Post by Joseph E. Smith »

lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
I think prayers are perfectly OK. In addition to meditations, prayer groups, cone senders etc... etc...
Image
User avatar
Loren
Posts: 8393
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: You just slip out the back, Jack
Make a new plan, Stan
You don't need to be coy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Hop on the bus, Gus
You don't need to discuss much
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
Location: Loren has left the building.

Post by Loren »

jim stone wrote:
DaleWisely wrote:
Bloomfield wrote: I don't see why it should be difficult to apply a sensible policy sensibly and reasonably, rather than stupidly and literally. You've never had an issue here which suggests that questions about tendinitis and flute pasture are not at the center of Dale's concern. Thinking about the substance of Dale's concern and making reasonable judgments in each instance should get you there in almost all cases. What Dale is asking is neither obscure nor difficult to apply.
It doesn't seem hard to me, either. I'm not going to try to spell out a highly specific policy. I'm just going to moderate as best I can. We've got moderators to help via PM. I think people can see the difference between someone saying, hey, my hand cramps when I hold the flute this way (Answer: Don't hold the flute that way) and, on the other...uh...hand, gee, I have this pain in my abdomen that won't go away, what should I do?

Could we please not think and talk this thing to death? There are things that have gone on that I can't write about here.
Hi, Dale,

Here's your policy:

I respectfully insist that people not post about mental health topics, in particular, and not ask for or give advice on medical topics in general.

I think it's sensible and fair to take a policy on a plain reading, at
least for starters. Yours says
that we are not to ask for or give advice on medical topics
in general. On the face of things that excludes the questions I
asked on the fluteboard--cubital tunnel sydrome, for instance,
is often treated by surgery and in fact I went to two physicians,
one at Barnes Jewish, another at the orthopaedic clinic
at St. Louis U, to get advice, along with consulting
my colleagues on the fluteboard. They were, by the way,
more helpful than the physicians. It is, please note, not like:
'My hand cramps when I hold it this way' and the answer is not: 'Hold it another way.' It really is a medically-related topic, one about
which musicians sometimes know more than doctors.

Nonetheless I take it you don't think I shouldn't have asked
about this on the fluteboard, or that in the future I shouldn't ask
about related problems. Nor do you think that people shouldn't
advise me.

And I think there have been numerous other
discussions about medically related issues, and dental issues, too,
where suggestions and advice were given, that you do not
mean to preclude.

But then, obviously, you don't intend your
policy 'Don't ask for or give advice on medical topics in general'
to mean that we shouldn't ask for or give advice on medical
topics in general.

The question then arises pretty forcibly,

what does this policy which you insist we follow mean?

Bloomie points out that the policy is not to be followed literally
and stupidly, and I think you concur.

Now, not unreasonably,
I take the force of this to be that we CAN ask for advice on
medical topics, at least sometimes, and that we CAN
give advice, at least sometimes.

I also take it
to be part of what you have in mind that we, in giving advice
about medical-related topics, exercise appropriate care
to give reasonable advice that doesn't endanger anybody.
That's very sensible, no question.

So here is what I take your policy to be, in plain English, if I understand you.

Be careful in giving advice onboard about medically-
related topics, to give advice that doesn't endanger anybody.
Be aware that you often don't know the people you are
talking with, and that bad advice can be dangerous. Err
on the side of caution.

If somebody says something like 'I have a persistent pain
in my abdomen, what should I do?' be sure to tell them to
seek professional help quickly, for instance, to go to an ER.

Please refrain from giving mental-health related advice
onboard. Remember that all sorts of people are reading these
threads, along with whomever you are advising.

Also, please keep in
mind the option of having these discussions in PMs or
e mails. Moderators will moderate onboard discussions,
as they deem necessary.

This is a reasonably specific policy, it strikes me as a
good one, it means just what it says, and I believe,
having read your post and Bloomie's too, that it is what
you have in mind.

Best wishes, Jim

Okay we know Jim doesn't work.....
User avatar
missy
Posts: 5833
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by missy »

Azalin wrote:
I'm more worried about this guy in San Francisco who can't post 12 000 messages per day now that the Political thread is on hold. What is he doin'?
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

(I'm sorry, I couldn't help it......)
Missy

"When facts are few, experts are many"

http://www.strothers.com
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
Well, in that thread Steve started it said in the article that ...uh... er....oh dear....never mind. I'm sure they are just fine.
Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. ~ Diligence is a very great help even to a mediocre intelligence.----Seneca
User avatar
Dale
The Landlord
Posts: 10293
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Chiff & Fipple's LearJet: DaleForce One
Contact:

Post by Dale »

lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
At this time, I'd like to officially and sincerely apologize for deleting the "roll eyes" emoticon.
User avatar
Tyghress
Posts: 2671
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1

Post by Tyghress »

DaleWisely wrote:
lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
At this time, I'd like to officially and sincerely apologize for deleting the "roll eyes" emoticon.

ROFLMFAO!!!!! Dale, please reread my PM.
Remember, you didn't get the tiger so it would do what you wanted. You got the tiger to see what it wanted to do. -- Colin McEnroe
User avatar
Lorenzo
Posts: 5726
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Oregon, USA

Post by Lorenzo »

Bloomfield wrote:Oooh, don't ever do that to me, Lorenzo, quoting my three-year-old posts back at me! (Except the funny ones, I guess).
Okee dokee, I won't tell anyone what you said about my good friend Calvin last time we were discussing self-restraint. Hummm...that was only two years ago. :lol:
User avatar
Joseph E. Smith
Posts: 13780
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
antispam: No
Location: ... who cares?...
Contact:

Post by Joseph E. Smith »

DaleWisely wrote:
lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
At this time, I'd like to officially and sincerely apologize for deleting the "roll eyes" emoticon.
Any chance you could reinstate it? Or, do so allowing only moderators to use it? :lol:
Image
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

Azalin wrote:
Loren wrote:Anybody here actually have a job?

Loren
I'm more worried about this guy in San Francisco who can't post 12 000 messages per day now that the Political thread is on hold. What is he doin'?
Oh poor jGilder. He's been reduced to Morris dancing and drinking :cry: .
I hope he manages to survive!
Image

Just kidding you a bit, Jack! :lol:
Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. ~ Diligence is a very great help even to a mediocre intelligence.----Seneca
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38238
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

Joseph E. Smith wrote:
DaleWisely wrote:
lixnaw wrote:So no more prayers for the sick then?
At this time, I'd like to officially and sincerely apologize for deleting the "roll eyes" emoticon.
Any chance you could reinstate it? Or, do so allowing only moderators to use it? :lol:
Allow me to suggest that the eye-roll emoticon be a perquisite of 7K club membership. Surely we are capable of restraint and maturity in our posts.

.....Oh, never mind.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
Loren
Posts: 8393
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: You just slip out the back, Jack
Make a new plan, Stan
You don't need to be coy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Hop on the bus, Gus
You don't need to discuss much
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
Location: Loren has left the building.

Post by Loren »

Nanohedron wrote: Allow me to suggest that the eye-roll emoticon be a perquisite of 7K club membership. Surely we are capable of restraint and maturity in our posts.

.....Oh, never mind.
Damn dude, I just looked at your post count: Having to work for a living has really put me behind, it's gonna be years before I get the eye roll emoticon back :waah: :waah: :waah:

Loren
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38238
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

Maybe Dale would make a special dispensation on the basis of chronologic seniority, instead of chronic prolixity. You'd qualify. I probably wouldn't.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
Walden
Chiffmaster General
Posts: 11030
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Coal mining country in the Eastern Oklahoma hills.
Contact:

Post by Walden »

Nanohedron wrote: Allow me to suggest that the eye-roll emoticon be a perquisite of 7K club membership. Surely we are capable of restraint and maturity in our posts.
Image
Reasonable person
Walden
Post Reply