How small? How Big? For science geeks

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
MarkB
Posts: 2468
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 6:00 pm

How small? How Big? For science geeks

Post by MarkB »

Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
User avatar
amar
Posts: 4857
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by amar »

fascinating.
Image
Image
User avatar
dubhlinn
Posts: 6746
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:04 pm
antispam: No
Location: North Lincolnshire, UK.

Post by dubhlinn »

Size doesn't matter.

Slan,
D. :P
And many a poor man that has roved,
Loved and thought himself beloved,
From a glad kindness cannot take his eyes.

W.B.Yeats
User avatar
Lambchop
Posts: 5768
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:10 pm
antispam: No
Location: Florida

Post by Lambchop »

Wow! That is neat!

And to think I almost didn't look, because it was about size and Amar found it fascinating and I thought that was worrisome!
User avatar
amar
Posts: 4857
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by amar »

there there now!
:o :D
Image
Image
User avatar
Joseph E. Smith
Posts: 13780
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
antispam: No
Location: ... who cares?...
Contact:

Re: How small? How Big? For science geeks

Post by Joseph E. Smith »

Wow... is my mind racing! :lol:
Image
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

Dangit. I clicked just so I could see a representation of Planck length relative to an electron, and I guess it just can't be done with pixels.
User avatar
Tyghress
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1

Post by Tyghress »

Remember, you didn't get the tiger so it would do what you wanted. You got the tiger to see what it wanted to do. -- Colin McEnroe
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

I had been thinking about how to convey to someone the difference in size between a dust particle and a vapor molecule. Some people mistakenly think a dust mask will protect them against hazardous vapors.

So I found the difference on these charts between the diameter of a water molecule and a talcum powder grain and then I went to measurements of bigger things and, roughly speaking, a water molecule (the vapor) is to a grain of talcum powder (the dust) as a large ant is to Mount Everest. So now I could say that a dust mask might keep out something like Mount Everest but things the size of ants, like toxic vapor molecules, could easily get through those holes.

What an odd coincidence that you should post these charts just as I was thinking about this.
Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. ~ Diligence is a very great help even to a mediocre intelligence.----Seneca
User avatar
djm
Posts: 17853
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 5:47 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Canadia
Contact:

Post by djm »

Cynth wrote:a dust mask will protect them against hazardous vapors
I may be way off base here, but aren't the activated carbon dust masks supposed to work on vapours by adsorption, as oppossed to absorption?

djm
I'd rather be atop the foothills than beneath them.
User avatar
Lambchop
Posts: 5768
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:10 pm
antispam: No
Location: Florida

Post by Lambchop »

That's right, Cynth! A dust mask or surgical mask will not protect against vapors!

They won't even protect against really itty stuff! You need a properly fitted respirator for some viruses.

For toxic gases, you need a mask with an air tank.

Sigh. It is soooo nice not to work in any of those places anymore! Soooo very nice! Yes it is!
User avatar
jbarter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Louth, England

Post by jbarter »

dubhlinn wrote:Size doesn't matter.

Slan,
D. :P
That's easy for a six footer to say. :evil: ( :wink: )
May the joy of music be ever thine.
(BTW, my name is John)
User avatar
jbarter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Louth, England

Post by jbarter »

Hey, if I measured myself in Planck lengths I'd sound really big. :)
May the joy of music be ever thine.
(BTW, my name is John)
User avatar
jsluder
Posts: 6231
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: South of Seattle

Post by jsluder »

jbarter wrote:Hey, if I measured myself in Planck lengths I'd sound really big. :)
Circumference? :twisted:
Giles: "We few, we happy few."
Spike: "We band of buggered."
User avatar
jbarter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Louth, England

Post by jbarter »

jsluder wrote:
jbarter wrote:Hey, if I measured myself in Planck lengths I'd sound really big. :)
Circumference? :twisted:
Hey, Moderator, the bigger boys are bullying me again. :swear:
May the joy of music be ever thine.
(BTW, my name is John)
Post Reply