Tyghress wrote:A missing option: I am not religious. I like poetry.
I figured "... I read poetry, but don't write it." would be sufficient to cover both the "like poetry" and "adore poetry" crowd.
I'm actually glad to see my original theory of a link between religious feelings and an appreciation of poetry falsified, as it saves me having to look for a mechanistic link.
I'm even more surprised, though, by the fact that the current figures (omitting the indecisive and the others) show twice as many non-religious (28) as religious (14)--by self-definition. Is it the notorious European contingent throwing things off?
Mike Wright
"When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its place."
--Goethe
I'm with Emm in the "Spiitual but not religious" category.
I can appreciate some poetry but I rarely go out of my way to encounter it. Most of the verse I've read and impacted me was in the context of German literatue classes from high school to grad school. I remember enjoying the German romantics a great deal.
Poetry comes to me at breakfast, waiting for my tea to steep and listening to the "Wild Birds Unlimited" commercial, a three second shot of birds and music box tinkle. I love the store, just can't figure out that tune! It derserved a poem. I frequently sing it throughout the day.
Did you know that "disorder" rhymes with "recorder"?
I sing the birdie tune
It makes the birdies swoon
It sends them to the moon
Just like a big balloon
D. has it right and says it well. Poetry, writing it and reading it, has much more to do with self-reflection than with self-expression, I think. There's a kind of distance of perspective -- as the idea of the sacred in religion makes it possible to see the self outside of the details and immediate demands of life, there's something in the artfully made language of a poem that takes you out of the self towards some shared understanding, then moves you back to where you were sitting, just not quite in the same place.
Darwin wrote:I'm even more surprised, though, by the fact that the current figures (omitting the indecisive and the others) show twice as many non-religious (28) as religious (14)--by self-definition. Is it the notorious European contingent throwing things off?
Some could also be religious people who are so religious that they would deny being religious because "it isn't religion it's real" or some such semantics like that.
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!