Difficulties and/or absence of hard bottom D
- Roy Becker
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:23 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Los Angeles
Difficulties and/or absence of hard bottom D
Hello all,
I am a new member of this forum.
I hope the following is not another repetition of an FAQ-item...
I have a problem with my hard bottom D:
The only way for me to actually get a hard bottom D which is 'reliable' is if the reed is very open. This of course makes the chanter way too loud, hard to play, difficult to control etc. If the reed's lips are closer together, and the instrument plays anywhere within the range of controlability, ease of play and loudness, my hard bottom D is either unreliable (sometimes I get it, sometimes I get an aweful note a few tones above it), or is absent altogether (and I get only that aweful tone). Many a time it gives me no choice other than playing soft bottom D only. Needless to say I don't like this situation.
Notice that I don't have a gurgling bottom-D problem. Moreover, I used to have a much better hard bottom D in the past (same chanter and reed).
Finally, notice that, in the NPU reed-making book, this problem is mentioned (chanter problem #17), but the only solution mentioned is "a wider staple eye may help". Needless to say I am not that enthusiastic about changing staple eye.
I wonder whether anyone has a suggestion...
Roy.
I am a new member of this forum.
I hope the following is not another repetition of an FAQ-item...
I have a problem with my hard bottom D:
The only way for me to actually get a hard bottom D which is 'reliable' is if the reed is very open. This of course makes the chanter way too loud, hard to play, difficult to control etc. If the reed's lips are closer together, and the instrument plays anywhere within the range of controlability, ease of play and loudness, my hard bottom D is either unreliable (sometimes I get it, sometimes I get an aweful note a few tones above it), or is absent altogether (and I get only that aweful tone). Many a time it gives me no choice other than playing soft bottom D only. Needless to say I don't like this situation.
Notice that I don't have a gurgling bottom-D problem. Moreover, I used to have a much better hard bottom D in the past (same chanter and reed).
Finally, notice that, in the NPU reed-making book, this problem is mentioned (chanter problem #17), but the only solution mentioned is "a wider staple eye may help". Needless to say I am not that enthusiastic about changing staple eye.
I wonder whether anyone has a suggestion...
Roy.
- Patrick D'Arcy
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2001 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
- Location: Los Angeles (via Dublin, Ireland)
- Contact:
Sounds like you need some poop in your hole.
PD.
PD.
Piper Sunday: socalpipers.com/piper_sunday.html
Pipes: UilleannObsession.com
Music: PatrickDarcyMusic.com
YouTube: My Channel - Click & Subscribe!
Southern California Pipers Club: socalpipers.com
Web Design: DarcyCreative.com
Pipes: UilleannObsession.com
Music: PatrickDarcyMusic.com
YouTube: My Channel - Click & Subscribe!
Southern California Pipers Club: socalpipers.com
Web Design: DarcyCreative.com
- Joseph E. Smith
- Posts: 13780
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: ... who cares?...
- Contact:
- Roy Becker
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:23 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Los Angeles
Well, at present I don't have a rush in the chanter bell (I have a rush going from the B to F vents...). I WILL give it a try, although this is going to cause some flattening of the bottom D, which, errrrr, might not be too desirable, because my bottom D tends to be a bit flat at times anyway.No E wrote:Do you have a rush in the chanter bell? That should make it a bit easier to get a hard D and help bring the hard and soft D closer in tune with each other.
No E
- Roy Becker
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:23 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Los Angeles
- KDMARTINKY
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:02 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Kentucky
- Joseph E. Smith
- Posts: 13780
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:40 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: ... who cares?...
- Contact:
- simonknight
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:53 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Southeastern PA USA
Wire tie is the way to go.
I just did this to my Gallagher chanter while working over the phone with Seth to get a new reed playing right.
As you put in a bigger tie, the soft D gets flatter so you need to experiment with the size of the tie. I ended up with about 1" of tie in a U shape. My hard D is now about 5 cents sharp and my soft D about 5c flat. On the hole is sounds OK, not poopy at all.
As you put in a bigger tie, the soft D gets flatter so you need to experiment with the size of the tie. I ended up with about 1" of tie in a U shape. My hard D is now about 5 cents sharp and my soft D about 5c flat. On the hole is sounds OK, not poopy at all.
Simon
- magroibin
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
An option to a twist tie is to use an "O" ring. This method was shown to me by Kirk Lynch. There are at least two variables that you need to pay attention to:
1) The outer diameter of the o ring must match the inside diameter of the chanter bell. It should fit snuggly just at the bottom of the chanter bell.
2) The thickness of the o ring can vary to bring the bottom d into pitch...as long as the outer diameter is the same of course. (I try to keep a selection of thin and thick o rings to match different reeds or reed temperments.)
It can be a challenge to find o rings that fit perfectly. A selection of both Imperial and metric sizes can help you find a match to your chanter.
Hope that helps,
Paul
1) The outer diameter of the o ring must match the inside diameter of the chanter bell. It should fit snuggly just at the bottom of the chanter bell.
2) The thickness of the o ring can vary to bring the bottom d into pitch...as long as the outer diameter is the same of course. (I try to keep a selection of thin and thick o rings to match different reeds or reed temperments.)
It can be a challenge to find o rings that fit perfectly. A selection of both Imperial and metric sizes can help you find a match to your chanter.
Hope that helps,
Paul
- goldy
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 11:04 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Roy,
Hard D becomes easier to make as you close down the reed, until you go too far and get that squeal that you've experienced out of the note (Paddy Maloney occasionally mucks about in performances by deliberately cramming excess air through and lifting the chanter off his knee two or three times for stacato squeals).
The 'O' Ring and "poop" option are definitely your first option, but please don't take "poop" literally! (although you don't stumble accross revolutionary changes without trying new ideas outside of the norm!).
As with Simon's explaination about the flattening of soft D, there are always going to be trade offs to any adjustment. With that in mind, a second option is to scrape the base of the scrape zone a little more as this will make hard D much easier and flatter in pitch (closer match to the pitch of soft D). An additional plus is that it will quieten/soften the reed (if it isn't already over scraped) and allow you to close the reed without introducing the squeals (the reed will be able to vibrate freely even though it is heavily closed). However, the trade off is that your back D is likely to become flatter and the second octave may also flatten as the extra scraping will flatten out the curve inside the reed and reduce the internal volume/space inside the reed. Regardless, the reed will be easier to blow and the second octave should become easier to get and hold.
The reduction in the size of the bell end is probably all that is needed, but I thought I'd give you another option incase it doesn't work for you or you want to take a risk and play 'Russian Roulette' with your reed
All the best.
Hard D becomes easier to make as you close down the reed, until you go too far and get that squeal that you've experienced out of the note (Paddy Maloney occasionally mucks about in performances by deliberately cramming excess air through and lifting the chanter off his knee two or three times for stacato squeals).
The 'O' Ring and "poop" option are definitely your first option, but please don't take "poop" literally! (although you don't stumble accross revolutionary changes without trying new ideas outside of the norm!).
As with Simon's explaination about the flattening of soft D, there are always going to be trade offs to any adjustment. With that in mind, a second option is to scrape the base of the scrape zone a little more as this will make hard D much easier and flatter in pitch (closer match to the pitch of soft D). An additional plus is that it will quieten/soften the reed (if it isn't already over scraped) and allow you to close the reed without introducing the squeals (the reed will be able to vibrate freely even though it is heavily closed). However, the trade off is that your back D is likely to become flatter and the second octave may also flatten as the extra scraping will flatten out the curve inside the reed and reduce the internal volume/space inside the reed. Regardless, the reed will be easier to blow and the second octave should become easier to get and hold.
The reduction in the size of the bell end is probably all that is needed, but I thought I'd give you another option incase it doesn't work for you or you want to take a risk and play 'Russian Roulette' with your reed
All the best.
We could learn a lot from crayons. Some are sharp, some are pretty and some are dull. Some have weird names, and all are different colors, but they all manage to live in the same box.