Levee Funding Cut

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
OnTheMoor
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:40 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by OnTheMoor »

TomB wrote: Well, as you are now no doubt aware, it's reported on the news that some of the individuals that had been involved in rescue efforts have been pulled from that task in order to "restore order", stop looters, etc.

Tom
1500 of the individuals me thinks. And "looters" seems to be used rather loosely. Armed gangs and arson look to be becoming serious problems.
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Doug_Tipple »

With regard to the Bush administration's successful efforts to redirect the funds that were badly needed to upgrade the levees protecting NO, my grandmother, God rest her soul, had a folk expression for everything. She would have said that redirecting funds away from levee improvement was "a penny wise and a pound foolish". Smart old woman, my grandma.
User avatar
Blackwood
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 12:51 pm

Post by Blackwood »

more details are emerging on cuts and preparedness and they are not pretty. In fact I saw Miles O'Brien of CNN get into a testy exchange with the governor of Arkansas (who is a Republican) when asked how he felt about the federal response (or slowness of it). The governor is a Republican loyalist and got strongly on the reporters case for even raising the question. In any event, as the article below mentioned you have to wonder how the news media manages to get a bunch of teams into the disaster areas within hours but no federal teams are there...

I hope one of the lessons will be is that we don't start a war overseas and drain domestically needed resources unless absolutely necessary. As it turns out the war in Iraq is costing us much more than we ever realized....

Posted on Wed, Aug. 31, 2005

Federal government wasn't ready for Katrina, disaster experts say

By Seth Borenstein

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The federal government so far has bungled the job of quickly helping the multitudes of hungry, thirsty and desperate victims of Hurricane Katrina, former top federal, state and local disaster chiefs said Wednesday.

The experts, including a former Bush administration disaster response manager, told Knight Ridder that the government wasn't prepared, scrimped on storm spending and shifted its attention from dealing with natural disasters to fighting the global war on terrorism.

The disaster preparedness agency at the center of the relief effort is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which was enveloped by the new Department of Homeland Security with a new mission aimed at responding to the attacks of al-Qaida.
"What you're seeing is revealing weaknesses in the state, local and federal levels," said Eric Tolbert, who until February was FEMA's disaster response chief. "All three levels have been weakened. They've been weakened by diversion into terrorism."
In interviews on Wednesday, several men and women who've led relief efforts for dozens of killer hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes over the years chastised current disaster leaders for forgetting the simple Boy Scout motto: Be Prepared.

Bush administration officials said they're proud of their efforts. Their first efforts emphasized rooftop rescues over providing food and water for already safe victims.

"We are extremely pleased with the response of every element of the federal government (and) all of our federal partners have made to this terrible tragedy," Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said during a news conference Wednesday in Washington.
The agency has more than 1,700 truckloads of water, meals, tents, generators and other supplies ready to go in, Chertoff said. Federal health officials have started setting up at least 40 medical shelters. The Coast Guard reports rescuing more than 1,200 people.
But residents, especially in Biloxi, Miss., said they aren't seeing the promised help, and Knight Ridder reporters along the Gulf Coast said they saw little visible federal relief efforts, other than search-and-rescue teams. Some help started arriving Wednesday by the truckloads, but not everywhere.

"We're not getting any help yet," said Biloxi Fire Department Battalion Chief Joe Boney. "We need water. We need ice. I've been told it's coming, but we've got people in shelters who haven't had a drink since the storm."
The slow response to Katrina and poor federal leadership is a replay of 1992's mishandling of Hurricane Andrew, said former FEMA chief of staff Jane Bullock, a 22-year veteran of the agency.
Bullock blamed inexperienced federal leadership. She noted that Chertoff and FEMA Director Michael Brown had no disaster experience before they were appointed to their jobs.
The slowness is all too familiar to Kate Hale. As Miami's disaster chief during Hurricane Andrew, Hale asked: "Where the hell's the cavalry?"

"I'm looking at people who are begging for ice and water and (a) presence," Hale said Wednesday. "I'm seeing the same sort of thing that horrified us after Hurricane Andrew. ... I realize they've got a huge job. Nobody understands better than I do what they're trying to respond to, but ..."

Budget cuts haven't made disaster preparedness any easier.

Last year, FEMA spent $250,000 to conduct an eight-day hurricane drill for a mock killer storm hitting New Orleans. Some 250 emergency officials attended. Many of the scenarios now playing out, including a helicopter evacuation of the Superdome, were discussed in that drill for a fictional storm named Pam.
This year, the group was to design a plan to fix such unresolved problems as evacuating sick and injured people from the Superdome and housing tens of thousands of stranded citizens.
Funding for that planning was cut, said Tolbert, the former FEMA disaster response director.
"A lot of good was done, but it just wasn't finished," said Tolbert, who was the disaster chief for the state of North Carolina. "I don't know if it would have saved more lives. It would have made the response faster. You might say it would have saved lives."
FEMA wasn't alone in cutting hurricane spending in New Orleans and the surrounding area.

Federal flood control spending for southeastern Louisiana has been chopped from $69 million in 2001 to $36.5 million in 2005, according to budget documents. Federal hurricane protection for the Lake Pontchartrain vicinity in the Army Corps of Engineers' budget dropped from $14.25 million in 2002 to $5.7 million this year. Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu requested $27 million this year.

Both the New Orleans Times-Picayune newspaper and a local business magazine reported that the effects of the budget cuts at the Army Corps of Engineers were severe.

In 2004, the Corps essentially stopped major work on the now-breached levee system that had protected New Orleans from flooding. It was the first such stoppage in 37 years, the Times-Picayune reported.

"It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay," Jefferson Parish emergency management chief Walter Maestri told the newspaper. "Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."

The Army Corps' New Orleans office, facing a $71 million cut, also eliminated funds to pay for a study on how to protect the Crescent City from a Category 5 storm, New Orleans City Business reported in June.

Being prepared for a disaster is basic emergency management, disaster experts say.

For example, in the 1990s, in planning for a New Orleans nightmare scenario, the federal government figured it would pre-deploy nearby ships with pumps to remove water from the below-sea-level city and have hospital ships nearby, said James Lee Witt, who was FEMA director under President Clinton.
Federal officials said a hospital ship would leave from Baltimore on Friday.

"These things need to be planned and prepared for; it just doesn't look like it was," said Witt, a former Arkansas disaster chief who won bipartisan praise on Capitol Hill during his tenure.

FEMA said some of its response teams were prepared.
The agency had 18 search-and-rescue teams and 39 disaster medical teams positioned outside storm areas and moved them in when the hurricane died down.
Nonetheless, victims of this week's hurricane should have gotten more, said John Copenhaver, a former southeastern regional FEMA director.

"I would have difficulty explaining why there has not been a visible presence of ice, water, tarps - the kind of stuff that typically get delivered to hurricane areas," Copenhaver said.

A FEMA spokesman, James McIntyre, blamed the devastation in the region for slowing down relief efforts.
Roads were washed out and relief trucks were stopped by state police trying to keep people out of hazardous areas, he said.

That explanation didn't satisfy Joe Myers, Florida's former emergency management chief.

"I would think that yesterday they could have flown in," said Myers. "Everyone was flying in. Put it this way, FOX and CNN are there. If they can get there ..."

FEMA moved quickly with its search-and-rescue teams, which took precedence over delivering water and ice, McIntyre said.

"We're trying to save lives," McIntyre said. "The rescue teams are FEMA people. The medical assistance are FEMA people. Right now, getting people off roofs and keeping people from drowning are a priority."

Further complicating the relief effort in Louisiana is scandal within the state agency. Recently, three top officials of Louisiana's emergency management office were indicted in an investigation into the misuse of hurricane funds from last year's Ivan.

None of this matters to residents of the Gulf Coast.
"We're lost," said Steve Loper of Pascagoula, Miss. "We have no direction, no leadership. People are in bad trouble."

Alison Young, Ron Hutcheson and Tish Wells of the Knight Ridder Newspapers Washington Bureau, Pete

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12528233.htm
Roger O'Keeffe
Posts: 2233
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Back home in the Green and Musty Isle, in Dublin.

Post by Roger O'Keeffe »

I'm nervous about getting into this discussion at all, but in relation to the statement
several men and women who've led relief efforts for dozens of killer hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes over the years chastised current disaster leaders for forgetting the simple Boy Scout motto: Be Prepared.
it seems to me that the worst piece of lack of preparedness was the approach to evacuation. As reported on this side of the Atlantic, people were encouraged to get out of New Orleans by their own efforts (i.e. by car), and it seemed that it was mainly those who hadn't got cars of their own who were left behind. Wouldn't it have been better to use relatively inexpensive public resources like school buses preventively and save lives in the process, rather than have to use Black Hawk helicopters etc. to evacuate survivors after the event?
An Pluiméir Ceolmhar
User avatar
jGilder
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:25 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by jGilder »

Here's an editorial from the Biloxi Sun Herald asking for desperately need help to save lives but wondering where the National Guard is.

========================================

South Mississippi needs your help

Wed, Aug. 31, 2005
  • "People are hurting and people are being vandalized.

    Yet where is the National Guard, why hasn't every able-bodied member of the armed forces in South Mississippi been pressed into service?

    On Wednesday reporters listening to horrific stories of death and survival at the Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north across Irish Hill Road and saw Air Force personnel playing basketball and performing calisthenics.

    Playing basketball and performing calisthenics!

    When asked why these young men were not being used to help in the recovery effort, our reporters were told that it would be pointless to send military personnel down to the beach to pick up debris.

    Litter is the least of our problems. We need the president to back up his declaration of a disaster with a declaration of every man and woman under his command will do whatever is necessary to deal with that disaster.
Full article
User avatar
lixnaw
Posts: 1638
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Isle of Geese

Post by lixnaw »

People who used a mail truck to escape the flooded areas of New Orleans East are forced to lie on the highway. August 31, 2005. The people were freed but forced to continue on foot. REUTERS/Rick

Image

and this while thousands of cars are flooded. the law draws a hard line.
they had no intention to sell that mailtruck or anything, they just used it to get out.
why are those people forced to continue on foot?
they are free now, but where're they suppose to go? no homes, money, work, food,...

the police just follow orders i suppose, but i wouldn't like the be a policeman...
Last edited by lixnaw on Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:22 pm, edited 9 times in total.
User avatar
lixnaw
Posts: 1638
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Isle of Geese

Post by lixnaw »

jGilder wrote:



On Wednesday reporters listening to horrific stories of death and survival at the Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north across Irish Hill Road and saw Air Force personnel playing basketball and performing calisthenics.

Playing basketball and performing calisthenics!

When asked why these young men were not being used to help in the recovery effort, our reporters were told that it would be pointless to send military personnel down to the beach to pick up debris.
i'd say that's just a small example of what's going on.
let's hope they'll get rescued anyway.

but i also believe that sanity will prevail at the next elections!
User avatar
cowtime
Posts: 5280
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Appalachian Mts.

Post by cowtime »

but i also believe that sanity will prevail at the next elections
That's what I thought last time.

We seem to have very short and selective memories.
"Let low-country intruder approach a cove
And eyes as gray as icicle fangs measure stranger
For size, honesty, and intent."
John Foster West
Post Reply