Okay, I'm confused. Chocolate isn't meat is it? Isn't it from a tree? Can't you be a vegetarian and eat chocolate? I know about carob and I don't know why people eat it, but surely it isn't because chocolate comes from an animal. Well, except for chocolate milk of course.izzy wrote:I can totally agree with you on that one! Which is a big part of the reason why I have not gone over to the "other" side as of yetdjm wrote:and I can assure you omnivorous happy as when I'm eatin' chocolate.
No more mint sauce jokes...
- Cynth
- Posts: 6703
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Iowa, USA
- I.D.10-t
- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:57 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA, Earth
Well man will do better!Bloomfield wrote:I thought it was: If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.djm wrote:If we weren't meant to eat meat it wouldn't taste so good! (an oldy but a goody)
"Be not deceived by the sweet words of proverbial philosophy. Sugar of lead is a poison."
- emmline
- Posts: 11859
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Annapolis, MD
- Contact:
Of course chocolate is vegetarian. It comes from a bean, like coffee.Cynth wrote: Okay, I'm confused. Chocolate isn't meat is it? Isn't it from a tree? Can't you be a vegetarian and eat chocolate? I know about carob and I don't know why people eat it, but surely it isn't because chocolate comes from an animal. Well, except for chocolate milk of course.
Why some people may sub carob (also a bean,) is because vegetarianism is often practiced as a part of "health-foodism," and many (especially 70's era) health foodies excluded chocolate on the basis of caffeine.
Most vegetarians I know embrace chocolate, thought the vegans eat only the dark (non-milk) variety.
- SteveShaw
- Posts: 10049
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 4:24 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Beautiful, beautiful north Cornwall. The Doom Bar is on me.
- Contact:
What's wrong with that is that we need animals to produce manure to fertilise the soil and maintain soil structure. In addition there are many millions of hectares of the earth's surface that are unsuitable for growing arable crops yet which can support grazing animals (many upland areas for example). If all the agricultural land on earth should suddenly become crop-growing to the exclusion of animals we would suffer even greater chemical pollution than we do now.I.D.10-t wrote:Well man will do better!Bloomfield wrote:I thought it was: If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.djm wrote:If we weren't meant to eat meat it wouldn't taste so good! (an oldy but a goody)
Steve
"Last night, among his fellow roughs,
He jested, quaff'd and swore."
They cut me down and I leapt up high
I am the life that'll never, never die.
I'll live in you if you'll live in me -
I am the lord of the dance, said he!
He jested, quaff'd and swore."
They cut me down and I leapt up high
I am the life that'll never, never die.
I'll live in you if you'll live in me -
I am the lord of the dance, said he!
- anniemcu
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:42 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: A little left of center, and 100 miles from St. Louis
- Contact:
Well.. no ... we could easily continue to enjoy eggs and milk, both harvestable without taking, or unduely taxing the life of the animal, and still have the manure they produce for fertilizer, etc. Not eating meat would not exactly equate to erasing animals from the planet, after all.SteveShaw wrote:What's wrong with that is that we need animals to produce manure to fertilise the soil and maintain soil structure. In addition there are many millions of hectares of the earth's surface that are unsuitable for growing arable crops yet which can support grazing animals (many upland areas for example). If all the agricultural land on earth should suddenly become crop-growing to the exclusion of animals we would suffer even greater chemical pollution than we do now.I.D.10-t wrote:Well man will do better!Bloomfield wrote: I thought it was: If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.
Steve
anniemcu
---
"You are what you do, not what you claim to believe." -Gene A. Statler
---
"Olé to you, none-the-less!" - Elizabeth Gilbert
---
http://www.sassafrassgrove.com
---
"You are what you do, not what you claim to believe." -Gene A. Statler
---
"Olé to you, none-the-less!" - Elizabeth Gilbert
---
http://www.sassafrassgrove.com
- Cynth
- Posts: 6703
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Iowa, USA
Aaaargh! I'm so embarrassed! I thought "dupe" could only be a verb and I am WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! It wasn't that I thought you were a dope, I thought you shouldn't say you were a dupe. So please accept my humble apologies!nano wrote:Cynth, why don't you say what you really think?Cynth wrote:nano, you've been duped and you are a dope. I think.
I am throwing tomatoes at myself.
- izzarina
- Posts: 6759
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 8:17 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Limbo
- Contact:
It's the milk for me...although I don't think that I'd eliminate it completely out of my diet even if I were to eliminate meat, I have a bit of an intolerance to milk anyway. So despite my love of it, it might be better to not have it, at least as much.emmline wrote:Of course chocolate is vegetarian. It comes from a bean, like coffee.Cynth wrote: Okay, I'm confused. Chocolate isn't meat is it? Isn't it from a tree? Can't you be a vegetarian and eat chocolate? I know about carob and I don't know why people eat it, but surely it isn't because chocolate comes from an animal. Well, except for chocolate milk of course.
Why some people may sub carob (also a bean,) is because vegetarianism is often practiced as a part of "health-foodism," and many (especially 70's era) health foodies excluded chocolate on the basis of caffeine.
Most vegetarians I know embrace chocolate, thought the vegans eat only the dark (non-milk) variety.
Anyway, that's what I meant. I did know that chocolate is vegetarian. I think that I said what I did because of some kind of giant rift in the cosmos.
Someday, everything is gonna be diff'rent
When I paint my masterpiece.
When I paint my masterpiece.
- djm
- Posts: 17853
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 5:47 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Canadia
- Contact:
I think the article ID10t posted is the kind of science that scares me most. Science does not know what all the components of our food do to us, which elements are good and in what quantities and, most especially, in what combinations. And yet here they go engineering something before they know what it is they need to engineer. Its great that they can do this stuff in the lab, but I would want there to be a whole lot more study in the field of nutrition before they add Franken-meat to the Franken-crops already being foisted upon us.
djm
djm
I'd rather be atop the foothills than beneath them.
- missy
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
- Contact:
djm- most of the beef and a lot of the chicken available in groceries today probably would fit your definition of "franken-meat" because of all the added hormones and antibiotics. Even buying "organic" or "free range" isn't a guarentee that you are avoiding these - unless you can find out exactly what the animals are fed and where that feed comes from.
(P.S. - I eat meat, btw)
(P.S. - I eat meat, btw)
- emmline
- Posts: 11859
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
- antispam: No
- Location: Annapolis, MD
- Contact:
Quite alright Izz. This can happen. Most likely the rift you mention allowed some sort of hooved cacaodebeest from another dimension to briefly gallop by in your peripheral visual field.izzarina wrote: I did know that chocolate is vegetarian. I think that I said what I did because of some kind of giant rift in the cosmos.
- Wanderer
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze. - Location: Tyler, TX
- Contact:
I absolutely agree...my favorite lamb dish is lamb chops (seared on the outside, rare on the inside) in a rosemary-lemon sauce. Fresh rosemary and lamb are a wonderful combination.SteveShaw wrote: Listen to this guy, people. Those of you that profess to dislike lamb are doing it wrong. Don't overcook. Avoid anything lean - lamb fat is wonderful (leg of lamb is nothing more than cat-food). Buy a whole shoulder weighing at least six and a half pounds and roast it for 30 mins. to the pound. Just season it a bit first and sprinkle chopped rosemary on it if you have it (NOT dried - please!)