Cheap, inexpensive or low-end?

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.

What do you call them?

Cheap
20
39%
Inexpensive
20
39%
Low-end
5
10%
Other answer (explain)
6
12%
 
Total votes: 51

User avatar
Dazzle1
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:00 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Sirhowy Valley, Wales

Post by Dazzle1 »

Cheap does sound nasty, when applied to whistles.


D
User avatar
Wormdiet
Posts: 2575
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:17 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: GreenSliabhs

Post by Wormdiet »

LOw-end.


Oh - I thought we were talking about Low-D's and so forth.
OOOXXO
Doing it backwards since 2005.
User avatar
markbell
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:10 pm
antispam: No
Location: Colorado: Hypoxia Capital of North America
Contact:

Post by markbell »

Dazzle1 wrote:Cheap does sound nasty, when applied to whistles.
D
Not so nasty as when applied to whistlers...

(Though I tend to take such an apellation as a badge of honor - what Diaspora Scot wouldn't?)
sibilo ergo sum
User avatar
PhilO
Posts: 2931
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: New York

Post by PhilO »

"Cheap" has a negative connotation, "inexpensive" is boring, and "low end" implies the bottom of the line of a particular maker. "Cheapie," OTOH, connotes a degree of fondness and is the most appropriate.

Philo
"This is this; this ain't something else. This is this." - Robert DeNiro, "The Deer Hunter," 1978.
Post Reply