The Great Fnatural Deathmatch

The Chiff & Fipple Irish Flute on-line community. Sideblown for your protection.
User avatar
Jayhawk
Posts: 3905
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Well, just trying to update my avatar after a decade. Hope this counts! Ok, so apparently I must babble on longer.
Location: Lawrence, KS
Contact:

Post by Jayhawk »

James - that would be a chore! The long F would make it easier, but I'd probably just be a slug and half hole the Fnats... :P Since we're up to speed, who'd notice?

Eric
User avatar
Cathy Wilde
Posts: 5591
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:17 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Somewhere Off-Topic, probably

Post by Cathy Wilde »

bradhurley wrote: ....
If you only could have one, the long F is the one to get -- if you get a short F only, you'll have trouble everytime you try to go from F to D or vice versa.
I've had a b*** of a time adjusting to the long F, but "The Girl That Broke My Heart" pretty much convinced me.

Put me in the long F camp ... I use the short F on like, one tune because I learned it that way. Instead, I'll generally half-hole or cross-finger, esp. at speed.
Deja Fu: The sense that somewhere, somehow, you've been kicked in the head exactly like this before.
User avatar
Wormdiet
Posts: 2575
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:17 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: GreenSliabhs

Post by Wormdiet »

Cathy Wilde wrote: I've had a b*** of a time adjusting to the long F, but "The Girl That Broke My Heart" pretty much convinced me.
I *love* that tune but learned it in D. Really easy to play that way.

If it weren't for the d@mn fiddles we wouldn;t need to wory about keyed flutes.
OOOXXO
Doing it backwards since 2005.
User avatar
Cathy Wilde
Posts: 5591
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:17 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Somewhere Off-Topic, probably

Post by Cathy Wilde »

:lol:, and amen!

In my case, it was even worse ... my hopes for a D go at it were shattered by an accordion. But you're right. It is a great tune.

(Now if I could just migrate The Moving Cloud from G to F ... but maybe by the time I'm 100!)
Deja Fu: The sense that somewhere, somehow, you've been kicked in the head exactly like this before.
User avatar
pandscarr
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Scotland

Post by pandscarr »

I always used to just use the short F - and found the long F really difficult. But the short F can be easily damaged, if it gets twisted it just doesn't close after use which has happened to one of my flutes.

So I've been forced to use the long F, and I really like it now - much better, much more stable and there are very very few situations when it's difficult - really only when going from the fnat to g# (aflat), and how often does that happen?
Little Impulse by Brian Finnegan


...not all who wander are lost...
spittle
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by spittle »

I opted for 4 key blocks on my last flute and will on my next flute as well (unless I'm feeling particularly indulgent), specifically deleting the short f-nat and c-nat. I didn't like the idea of the short f-nat requiring the lifting of the G-hole (is that right?), and if you've already got 1 f-nat, why bother with 2? However, I have no experience w/either, it bears mentioning :roll:

Sort-of on-topic: Does the addition of short f-nat or c-nat keys enable any tricky or cool ornaments that aren't otherwise possible on a keyless instrument? I've always wanted to be able to do a roll on c-nat and wondered if the key would help.

Cheers!
- Ryan
User avatar
NicoMoreno
Posts: 2100
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I just wanted to update my location... 100 characters is a lot and I don't really want to type so much just to edit my profile...
Location: St. Louis, MO

Post by NicoMoreno »

spittle wrote:I opted for 4 key blocks on my last flute and will on my next flute as well (unless I'm feeling particularly indulgent), specifically deleting the short f-nat and c-nat. I didn't like the idea of the short f-nat requiring the lifting of the G-hole (is that right?), and if you've already got 1 f-nat, why bother with 2? However, I have no experience w/either, it bears mentioning :roll:

Sort-of on-topic: Does the addition of short f-nat or c-nat keys enable any tricky or cool ornaments that aren't otherwise possible on a keyless instrument? I've always wanted to be able to do a roll on c-nat and wondered if the key would help.

Cheers!
- Ryan
short and long Fnat are essentially the same hole with different touches (although most flutes, there are two holes on either side of the flute)

This means that you play an E and then hit the key (either the long with your pinky or the short with your ring finger) No G hole involved.

Cnat key allows a cnat that is tonally more similar to the other notes. Ie brighter, more in tune, stonger etc.

I don't do ornaments with keys.
User avatar
peeplj
Posts: 9029
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
Contact:

Post by peeplj »

There is only one ornament I sometimes do with a key. In the second octave I like to cut the "left hand" notes (B,A,G) with the C-natural key. It gives a nice almost "mechanical artifact" cut that for some reason reminds me of the pipes.

Using the F-natural key (either one) does enable you to do a kind of "crann" on the note if you wish, but usually an off-beat breath pulse will work as well and sound better too. (IMHO, if course, and varies from tune to tune...)

--James
mcdafydd
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:51 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: My wife and I moved back to beautiful Central Vermont and I need to update my Location! Thanks much...
Location: Central Vermont

Post by mcdafydd »

I still vote for a Cnat thumbhole as opposed to another long key. But I wonder why such a thing never caught on? It shouldn't be because of the flute balance which isn't primarily supported by the upper hand thumb.. what do you all think?

As far as short F vs. long F, I only have a keyed flute with the short variety... gotta make do.
User avatar
fluter_d
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cork, Ireland

Post by fluter_d »

peeplj wrote:
Jayhawk wrote:Fnat to D with a short F isn't that hard if you think of it as a slide off the Fnat key. D to Fnat is a slide onto the key.

Eric
I can do the slide off of the key on any of my flutes pretty well.

The slide onto the key, though--that I can't quite make work on any of them. Then again, my flutes have long-F keys, so I've not spent a lot of time trying.

If you really wanna impress me, play this figure from Eileen Curran at speed with only the short F:

K: Gmin

AFcFdFcF

That rocking pedal is hard enough to do *with* the long F!

--James
This is where I cheat and keep my pinkie on the long F key while I cross-finger the Cnat... Much easier all 'round! I never use the short F key.
I did have to play one tune once (it's stuck in my memory!) with a Fnat-Gsharp note change: I cross-fingered the G#, if I recall correctly. Or maybe just took a breath through one or the other... It was a while ago. (For the masochistic, it was a Niall Vallely tune from "Beyond Words" :twisted: ).

Deirdre
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7707
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Post by chas »

I don't find it at all difficult to half-hole the F. On my 4-key (short f) that's what I do most of the time. I really need to work on my 6-key to make it playable. The long-F is broken; I just need to braze a little more metal onto it.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
Doc Jones
Posts: 3672
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Southern Idaho, USA
Contact:

Post by Doc Jones »

Jayhawk wrote:Fnat to D with a short F isn't that hard if you think of it as a slide off the Fnat key. D to Fnat is a slide onto the key.

Then again, maybe I just have freaky fingers... :party:

Eric
Don't listen to Eric. He likes doing things the hard way. :lol:

If you're only getting one F key it must be a long F for all the reasons mentioned above.

Doc
:) Doc's Book

Want to learn about medicinal herbs?
Doc's Website

Want to become a Clinical Herbalist? Doc's Herb School
User avatar
sturob
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Post by sturob »

bradhurley wrote:I use the short F most of the time, but as someone pointed out above, there's no way to go cleanly from D to F or F to D without the long F natural key. That's primarily what it's there for, but some people prefer to use it for every instance of F.
I know I've been super-quiet lately, but come now, people. (Hi Brad!)

I've never ever used the long F key to date. When I go from D to Fnat, I notice that I grace it with a G. So, if we let F be the short F key, I do:

XXX XXX
XXX OXX
XXX XXF

It's smooth and sounds perfectly natural. With practice, the gracing is like a little bubble.

I just had to point out that it Can Be Done. Maybe not legato, but you can definitely go from low D to short Fnat.

Stuart
Post Reply