I Don't Get It - I'll Wait for the Holodeck

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Caj
Posts: 2166
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Binghamton, New York
Contact:

Post by Caj »

I don't have a TV.

If I ever get one, it will be an LCD projector, because technologically there are a lot of huge innovations in the pipeline for movie screens.

For example, engineers just recently invented a screen material that only reflects the 3 specific color bands made by an LCD projector. This means that glare from a window will no longer be a problem--you can watch without dimming the lights, and the display will seem brighter, like a normal TV.

For the larger pocketbooks, there is a pricey new rear-projected screen that allows light to pass right through it unless it hits at just the right angle. So the projector is set to that angle, and window glare passes through it.

Both of these are clever ideas, but not completely non-obvious. It just happened that nobody thought much about improving projector TV displays until recently. It's due for a few big leaps.

Caj
User avatar
glauber
Posts: 4967
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: I'm from Brazil, living in the Chicago area (USA)
Contact:

Post by glauber »

Caj wrote:It just happened that nobody thought much about improving projector TV displays until recently.
That's interesting, considering that they're such a huge source of annoyance in business meetings.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!
--Wellsprings--
User avatar
glauber
Posts: 4967
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: I'm from Brazil, living in the Chicago area (USA)
Contact:

Post by glauber »

PhilO wrote:Me no care; me wants it!
If we could have one Star Trek thing, i would love to have a transporter. Even considering the high risk of ending up in a parallel universe, or having my good and evil parts ending up as separate beings.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!
--Wellsprings--
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Re: I Don't Get It - I'll Wait for the Holodeck

Post by emmline »

PhilO wrote:
Maybe it's just like some of us spending hundreds on whistles when the $10 jobs will do just fine...oh well.

Philo
I don't think it's like whistles. My attraction to my upscale whistles is their handcraftedness. Electronics are anonymously mass-produced.
glauber wrote: If we could have one Star Trek thing, i would love to have a transporter. Even considering the high risk of ending up in a parallel universe, or having my good and evil parts ending up as separate beings.
My good and evil aspects are far too co-dependent to disengage. I'd be safe. But I'll still take the holodeck.
User avatar
PhilO
Posts: 2931
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: New York

Post by PhilO »

We kid about Star Trek, but there are several things and ideas therein which have or are becoming realities. I love Dr. McCoy ("Bones")'s non-invasive little diagnostic zapper thingy, etc. I truly believe that we can eventually realize anything we can think of; so Glauber, perhaps my great grandchildren will see or use a transporter or be a crew member on an intergallactic ship (hopefully not after some atomic apochalypse, survived by a super race led by Ricardo Montalban).

Live long and prosper. How many of you can do that thing Spock does with his fingers?

Philo
"This is this; this ain't something else. This is this." - Robert DeNiro, "The Deer Hunter," 1978.
User avatar
amar
Posts: 4857
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by amar »

PhilO wrote:We kid about Star Trek, but there are several things and ideas therein which have or are becoming realities. I love Dr. McCoy ("Bones")'s non-invasive little diagnostic zapper thingy, etc. I truly believe that we can eventually realize anything we can think of; so Glauber, perhaps my great grandchildren will see or use a transporter or be a crew member on an intergallactic ship (hopefully not after some atomic apochalypse, survived by a super race led by Ricardo Montalban).

Live long and prosper. How many of you can do that thing Spock does with his fingers?

Philo
i can....do I smell a poll...?
Image
Image
User avatar
Charlene
Posts: 1352
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:22 am
antispam: No
Location: Spokane, Washington
Contact:

Post by Charlene »

amar wrote:
PhilO wrote:We kid about Star Trek, but there are several things and ideas therein which have or are becoming realities. I love Dr. McCoy ("Bones")'s non-invasive little diagnostic zapper thingy, etc. I truly believe that we can eventually realize anything we can think of; so Glauber, perhaps my great grandchildren will see or use a transporter or be a crew member on an intergallactic ship (hopefully not after some atomic apochalypse, survived by a super race led by Ricardo Montalban).

Live long and prosper. How many of you can do that thing Spock does with his fingers?

Philo
i can....do I smell a poll...?

I can do the Vulcan salute with my left hand but not too well with my right. :)

I think I already own the Romulan cloaking device (that the Klingons stole and adapted for their ships)- everytime I'm out driving around people cut in front of me like I'm invisible. It must be attached to me, not my vehicle, because it doesn't matter what car I'm in! :D

Back to the main topic - aren't we (in the US) going to have to buy an HDTV sometime in the next 10 years due to some silly FCC regulations? I think that's why regular TVs are so cheap now.
Charlene
User avatar
aderyn_du
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Atlanta

Post by aderyn_du »

I can do the Vulcan salute with both my left and right hands, and also with my toes.

Aren't you ever-so-glad to know that?? :P
Music melts all the separate parts of our bodies together. ~Anais Nin
User avatar
TomB
Posts: 2124
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: East Hartford, CT

Post by TomB »

aderyn_du wrote:I can do the Vulcan salute with both my left and right hands, and also with my toes.

Aren't you ever-so-glad to know that?? :P

Yet another person with many talents.
:boggle:
Tom
"Consult the Book of Armaments"
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

Charlene wrote: Back to the main topic - aren't we (in the US) going to have to buy an HDTV sometime in the next 10 years due to some silly FCC regulations? I think that's why regular TVs are so cheap now.
Heeeeey! What? Someone answer this please!
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

aderyn_du wrote:I can do the Vulcan salute with both my left and right hands, and also with my toes.

Aren't you ever-so-glad to know that?? :P
This explains why you've never exposed your ears in a avatar photo.
User avatar
TomB
Posts: 2124
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: East Hartford, CT

Post by TomB »

emmline wrote:
aderyn_du wrote:I can do the Vulcan salute with both my left and right hands, and also with my toes.

Aren't you ever-so-glad to know that?? :P
This explains why you've never exposed your ears in a avatar photo.
The following is from a PC World article, in May of 1994. Other than that, I don't know.

Under FCC rules, commercial broadcasters had to begin digital TV transmissions by May 2002, and the National Association of Broadcasters' Web site says that 1155 of the United States' over-the-air broadcasters met the deadline. But while the FCC allocated sufficient bandwidth for these stations to broadcast HD content, it established no statutory or regulatory requirement that they do so. At least a few stations have begun using the bandwidth to broadcast standard-definition digital channels--a practice known as multicasting--because they can fit about half a dozen such broadcasts within the bandwidth of 19.4 megabits per second that is required for a single HD channel.

Though the FCC has made no hard-and-fast rule that stations must broadcast HD content, "There's a general understanding that we have to be good stewards and not completely subvert the positioning of HDTV broadcasts," says Steve Pair, vice president of engineering for WCBS (the CBS-owned-and-operated station in New York). The FCC says broadcasters may use the channels "according to their best judgment" as long as they offer free digital service at a resolution comparable to that of the analog shows they air during the same time periods.

A likely scenario, in Pair's opinion, is that stations will use some portion of the 19.4-mbps bandwidth for additional broadcast streams, which would remove some data from an HD show but not enough to degrade the quality of the image significantly


Tom
"Consult the Book of Armaments"
User avatar
Sunnywindo
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Earth

Post by Sunnywindo »

Was going to say "I want a holodeck" but spend too much time on the computer as it is, imagine how addicting a holodeck could get! :boggle:

:) Sara
'I wish it need not have happend in my time,' said Frodo.
'So do I,' said Gandalf, 'and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.'

-LOTR-
User avatar
TomB
Posts: 2124
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: East Hartford, CT

Post by TomB »

Sunnywindo wrote:Was going to say "I want a holodeck" but spend too much time on the computer as it is, imagine how addicting a holodeck could get! :boggle:

:) Sara

Yeah, but at least you could do what you want, without anyone bugging you.

Tom
"Consult the Book of Armaments"
User avatar
bradhurley
Posts: 2330
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Montreal
Contact:

Post by bradhurley »

Charlene wrote: I think I already own the Romulan cloaking device (that the Klingons stole and adapted for their ships)
Watch the news early next week, you might just hear something about this.
Post Reply