Real or Fake? And Perhaps a New Avatar.

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Real or Fake? And Perhaps a New Avatar.

Post by Wombat »

User avatar
aderyn_du
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Atlanta

Post by aderyn_du »

Need to brush up on my Snopes knowledge-- I got 7 out of 10 correct. :P
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Post by Wombat »

aderyn_du wrote:Need to brush up on my Snopes knowledge-- I got 7 out of 10 correct. :P
That's one better than I did. But I misunderstood the question in one case. I realised I can't tell you which or I'll spoil it for you. I started off well and then got careless.
User avatar
aderyn_du
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Atlanta

Post by aderyn_du »

Wombat wrote:
aderyn_du wrote:Need to brush up on my Snopes knowledge-- I got 7 out of 10 correct. :P
That's one better than I did. But I misunderstood the question in one case. I realised I can't tell you which or I'll spoil it for you. I started off well and then got careless.

That happened to me on one of the questions, too... wonder if it was the same one!
Music melts all the separate parts of our bodies together. ~Anais Nin
User avatar
Wombat
Posts: 7105
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: Probably Evanston, possibly Wollongong

Post by Wombat »

aderyn_du wrote:
Wombat wrote:
aderyn_du wrote:Need to brush up on my Snopes knowledge-- I got 7 out of 10 correct. :P
That's one better than I did. But I misunderstood the question in one case. I realised I can't tell you which or I'll spoil it for you. I started off well and then got careless.

That happened to me on one of the questions, too... wonder if it was the same one!
Snowscene?
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

I got 8 right. But it was kind of a question of plausibility, or likelihood of someone hoaxing a particular subject.
User avatar
sturob
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Post by sturob »

I must be more cynical than the rest of you; I got 9/10.

:)

Stuart
User avatar
aderyn_du
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Atlanta

Post by aderyn_du »

Wombat wrote:
aderyn_du wrote:
Wombat wrote: That's one better than I did. But I misunderstood the question in one case. I realised I can't tell you which or I'll spoil it for you. I started off well and then got careless.

That happened to me on one of the questions, too... wonder if it was the same one!
Snowscene?
No... it was a different one that got me. I was coming from the angle of not believing in a certain thing, and so therefore it couldn't possibly have shown in the picture. :P
User avatar
vomitbunny
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:34 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: spleen

Post by vomitbunny »

I got 9. But I've spent a lot of time at Snopes, and I have a friend who constantly sends me crap like that. I've seen most of those.
My opinion is stupid and wrong.
User avatar
TyroneShoelaces
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:18 am

Post by TyroneShoelaces »

i scored 8 out of 10. most of them were a little too unbelievable.
plus, i hang around with norman and the boys, so i have a feel for when
my chain is being yanked.
ever been mugged by a quaker?
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

I have that site in my window's hosts file as restricted. It must be chock full of spyware.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
Tak_the_whistler
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Japan

Post by Tak_the_whistler »

I got 4..... :cry:
<><
Tak
---------------------------------------
<b>"Nothing can be yours by nature."</b>
--- Lewis
User avatar
amar
Posts: 4857
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by amar »

9 out of 10. got the chickenhead wrong..
Image
Image
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

amar wrote:9 out of 10. got the chickenhead wrong..
Proud to say, I got the chicken head right! Predisposed to distrust McD's though. Also, there's a certain amount of stats involved--2 have been hoaxes, this one is probably not...

(oh. shoot...I be we have a franchise holder on the board somewhere who now hates me... :( )
User avatar
burnsbyrne
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Post by burnsbyrne »

I only got 5 right. I guess I'm an equal opportunity sceptic.
Post Reply