Izzy, this is not MY thread. It's here as a public service to all chiffers in need of a good primal scream.izzarina wrote: (sorry, Em...didn't mean to hijack your thread...I'm done yelling at Nano now)
Aaarrrrgggghhhh.
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
- BrassBlower
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Fly-Over Country
(rim shot)aderyn_du wrote: There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors.
~Jim Morrison
https://www.facebook.com/4StringFantasy
I do not feel obliged to believe that that same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
-Galileo
I do not feel obliged to believe that that same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
-Galileo
- toughknot
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 7:24 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Pennsylvania
I shan't chastise, I agree completely." Shan't " a contraction of shan not, as in I shan not go swimming or giving unsolicited negative jibes ( hardly reviews ) on makers limited approved announcement threads today. Today I also shan't eat biscuits and gravy, nor stand on one leg.emmline wrote:Wow...all these "hope it wasn't me" posts!
No, it's just an idiosyncratic etiquette issue. When a whistle maker starts one of his/her few allowed threads to promote his/her business, it strikes me that that thread is not the place to weigh in with negative opinions about that person's products. (unless he/she asked for reviews.)
I'm all for free discussion of opinions about whistles, and open reviewing, but how about posting an independent review, rather than highjacking a craftperson's promotional thread?
edit: I've been chastised gently for this kind of snarl before...I think it may be a peeve that's unique to me. I'm not trying to derail the cherished C&F uncensored, free-posting ideology. (nor do I intend to behave offensively toward the chiffers who've expressed the negative opinions I refer to here--they are chiffers whose opinions, I'll add, I tend to respect.)
- CHIFF FIPPLE
- Posts: 722
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 10:22 am
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Albawhistle Works Bonnie Scotland
- Contact:
Gosh, darn and blast O'h that feels better I hope I have not gone too far
Stacey has the most bodacious fipples! & Message board
http://whistlenstrings.invisionzone.com ... t=0&p=3303&
http://whistlenstrings.invisionzone.com ... t=0&p=3303&
- TyroneShoelaces
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:18 am
Don't really need to vent, but I have to admit that that thread did make me a little uncomfortable.Darwin wrote:Cool! So I wasn't the only one who felt that way.emmline wrote:Wow...all these "hope it wasn't me" posts!
No, it's just an idiosyncratic etiquette issue. When a whistle maker starts one of his/her few allowed threads to promote his/her business, it strikes me that that thread is not the place to weigh in with negative opinions about that person's products. (unless he/she asked for reviews.)
I'm all for free discussion of opinions about whistles, and open reviewing, but how about posting an independent review, rather than highjacking a craftperson's promotional thread?