Bloomfield wrote:mrosenlof wrote:I have been a Mac user since 1988. True there's not as much software for the thng, but there's been everything _I_ need.
I too have yet to meet someone who needed software and couldn't get it for the Mac. What people usually mean when they say "there is more software for the PC than for Mac" is computer games. And if I was going to play computer games, I would buy a PC or if I had to work on COBAL or FORTRAN, but short of that the only reasons for choosing a PC are a vague fear of the unknown or religious fervor, I agree.
BTW, Mac prices are not "exorbitant." I doubt they are higher than PC prices for what you get; the eMac for instance must be one of the best bang-for-the-buck deals out there.
I dunno about COBOL, but there are decent Fortran compilers out there for the Mac. I haven't updated mine to OSX, but will probably have to in the near future. I also have a really good 3D CAD program for the Mac that reads and writes .dxf and .dwg files pretty well for cross-platform compatibility. Of course, Code Warrior can't be beat if you're into the whole C thing, and you can even compile Windows programs on the Mac using CW. A lot of PC games are developed on Macs using CW.
Also, a lot of PC programs will run just fine on a Mac running one of the emulators. The one thing I've found is that anything that uses Explorer will be painfully slow in emulation.
Regarding the prices, I also can't believe the propaganda out there. My brother-in-law got a new PC last fall. He went on and on about how he "really wanted a Mac," but it was going to cost more than twice as much, like $5k as opposed to $2200. I had just bought a laptop, so I was up on the latest prices, and I have no idea what could have brought the price of a Mac up to $5k -- I suspect he was adding on features that it already had, plus automatically went to the top of the line, which would be an awful lot more powerful than what he bought.