Ornamentation--Articulations vs. Grace Notes

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
Post Reply
User avatar
Darwin
Posts: 2719
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:38 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Contact:

Ornamentation--Articulations vs. Grace Notes

Post by Darwin »

Having gotten Grey Larsen's Essential Tin Whistle Toolbox, and seeing his point that "ornamentation" is an unfortunate choice of terminology for what is really better described as "articulation", I'm beginning to wonder about the use of real ornamentation--grace notes--in ITM, but mainly in slow airs. (I have only one polka, one slip jig, and one hornpipe--none of them played either often or well.)

From my non-ITM background, I have a tendency to use lots of grace notes in slow tunes (hammer-ons and pull-offs on the guitar). I do use cuts to articulate notes, but I also feel the need for grace notes, as well, as I work out variations on various slow airs. Is this approach foreign to ITM? Most discussions seem to center around dance music, so I thought that points made in such discussions might not apply to slow airs and songs. Should I just play the bare-bones melodies as presented? (I'm learning from book-CD combos.)

As I've said before, I play alone and am not particularly interested in ITM, per se, but I still want to know what is considered "standard".
Mike Wright

"When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its place."
 --Goethe
User avatar
emmline
Posts: 11859
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by emmline »

Bumping you, because I'd like to read a response. (Maybe if you listen to some recordings of slow airs you'll be able to discern whether they're ornamenting or articulating...dunno.)
User avatar
Byll
Posts: 1189
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Long ago, I was told that I faked iTrad whistle work very well. I took that comment to heart. 20 years of private lessons - and many, many hours of rehearsal later - I certainly hope I have improved...
Location: South Eastern Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by Byll »

Hi, Mike: This type of topic normally elicits great mounds of discussion.

You are correct in your assessment concerning traditional ornamentation. It is not truly ornamentation; it amounts to a change in the air flow - usually, but not always brought about by finger manipulation, which creates a form of articulation...The note produced by the 'ornamentation' is not important. What IS important is the 'sound' of the articulation, and where and how perfectly it is achieved.

I understand - and respect - those to whom the purity of Irish traditional music is of paramount importance. There is a stark beauty in the juxtaposition of pure melody, sans harmony, with articulations that are crisp, well executed, and accepted as the norm...For me, personally, a little goes a long way...

In my own musical world - and it seems in yours - there is a place for the marriage of traditional Irish ornamentation with grace notes, and other 'classical' ornamentation. I find the mixture interesting, sustaining, and it provides a larger blank page for creative arranging and improvising.

As Mrs. Capulet said, 700 years ago, 'Do what ye will...' I would like to hope that Bach would not have turned up his nose at the addition of a tap or a cut in an improvisatory moment in one of his Brandenburgs...

Best.
Byll
'Everything Matters...'
Lisa Diane Cope 1963-1979
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

I am not sure what you are saying to be honest so left this alone for a bit.

I can say this much, air playing is an instrumental reflection of the [sean nos] singing. When you listen to good singers in the sean nos style you'll find that in a lot of cases they would embellish the plain notes of the songs rather elaborately. Listen for example to Willie Clancy's playing of The Trip we took over the Mountain, Bhean Dubh an Ghleanna or An Buachaill Caol Dubh, there's a lot more going on there than mere articulation.
jim stone
Posts: 17192
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:00 pm

Post by jim stone »

Following the rule less is more, do both, I say.
User avatar
dubhlinn
Posts: 6746
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:04 pm
antispam: No
Location: North Lincolnshire, UK.

Post by dubhlinn »

:-?
hello everybody,
why is everybody wasting so much time and effort with stuff that should not be heard outside of a lecture hall?
ITM is a living,breathing artform unique in its depth and simplicity.It does not matter in the slightest if you throw in a "fiddly bit" when the notion takes you.YOU are playing the tune not vice versa.Don't be afraid of the tune-it won't bite you.Listen to some of the great bands -Bothy Band,Altan etc.- and it is obvious that the players are not playing note for note with each other.
I mean, where would we be if nobody ever strayed off the page?, no Miles,no Ella,no ( I could go on all night here!).
Play away to your hearts content,ENJOY the music,it comes from the soul not the brain,you are a channel through which it passes and YOU are not HIM or HER, YOU are YOU. if it sounds ok and YOU like it then DO IT.
Now that I have gotten that off my chest I'm off to play a few tunes to myself

bfn,
D.

:lol:
User avatar
feadogin
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post by feadogin »

dubhlinn wrote::-?
Play away to your hearts content,ENJOY the music,it comes from the soul not the brain
Hi Dubhlinn,

Like you, I am definitely of the "just play it" school of musicianship, but different people learn in different ways. I now realize that some people really do learn music "through the brain," and this type of discussion helps them.

For the rest of us, though, as another piper in my class said last week, (to paraphrase) "The more I try to think about what I'm doing, the worse I play!" :)

Justine
User avatar
Brian Lee
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain
Contact:

Post by Brian Lee »

dubhlinn wrote:I mean, where would we be if nobody ever strayed off the page?
You'd be in a Great Highland Pipe band. That one's simple enough.

:tomato:
User avatar
Darwin
Posts: 2719
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:38 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Contact:

Post by Darwin »

dubhlinn wrote::-?
why is everybody wasting so much time and effort with stuff that should not be heard outside of a lecture hall?
ITM is a living,breathing artform unique in its depth and simplicity.It does not matter in the slightest if you throw in a "fiddly bit" when the notion takes you.YOU are playing the tune not vice versa.Don't be afraid of the tune-it won't bite you.Listen to some of the great bands -Bothy Band,Altan etc.- and it is obvious that the players are not playing note for note with each other.
For myself, not being a part of any ITM community, not having access to such, and not having either the funds to buy, or the time to listen to, lots of recordings, I was just curious about where the "edges" are seen as being.

It's not a question of being restricted by the information, but I think it's a shame to remain ignorant when I have a resource like C&F at my disposal.

Peter's answer is particularly useful to me. In the first place, because I see him as being a real ITM "insider" (correct me if I'm wrong), and in the second place because I've heard what I believe to be similar singing in related traditions ("Land A-growin'" from Ewan McColl, or "Fair and Tender Ladies" from Jean Ritchie), as well as a bit of actual Irish singing (Margaret Barry). Unfortunately, the only thing I have by Willie Clancy is a pair of jigs on the pipes, with Michael Gorman on fiddle.
Mike Wright

"When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its place."
 --Goethe
User avatar
dubhlinn
Posts: 6746
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:04 pm
antispam: No
Location: North Lincolnshire, UK.

Post by dubhlinn »

Brian Lee wrote:
dubhlinn wrote:I mean, where would we be if nobody ever strayed off the page?
You'd be in a Great Highland Pipe band. That one's simple enough.

:tomato:


:D
Mmmm,

Miles davis,Ella Fitzgerald or a highland pipe band.

That's gonna be a real tough call.
:wink:
User avatar
BoneQuint
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 2:17 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Bellingham, WA
Contact:

Post by BoneQuint »

It's even better when it comes from the soul AND the brain. Each taking its place, and staying out of the way of the other...
User avatar
talasiga
Posts: 5199
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:33 am
antispam: No
Location: Eastern Australia

Articulation Vs Oranmentation

Post by talasiga »

Darwin, my thinking on this goes something like this:-

From a modal/melodic perspective the whole phenomenon is articulation
but from a chordal/harmonic perspective, which necessarily sees some of the phenomenon as essential and other parts as optional, the other parts are called "ornamentation".

When I play with melodic tradition musicians these distinctions do not need to be drawn out when discussing a composition because the so-called "ornamentations" and "grace" notes are essential and intrinsic to the life of the music and are spontaneously grasped as such.

However, if there is a chordal factor to be considered
(eg the ubiquitous chord playing guitarist who refuses to play arpeggios)
then the artificial exercise of segregating the core from the ornament
comes into play
for the benefit of establishing the harmonic architecture.

I am sorry, if once again, I have not expressed myself well
but I am a picture person and not so much a wordsmith.

And please let me know if this is relevant to your issues.
qui jure suo utitur neminem laedit
User avatar
brewerpaul
Posts: 7300
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

Post by brewerpaul »

Byll wrote: I would like to hope that Bach would not have turned up his nose at the addition of a tap or a cut in an improvisatory moment in one of his Brandenburgs...
Best.
Byll
Actually, most Baroque musicians would turn their noses up at a player who DIDN'T add ornamentation! It was pretty much assumed by composers of the era that players would add appropriate ornamentation, and that no two performances would be exactly the same. There was one composer, whose name I can't recall, who insisted that his music be played as written, but he was definitely in the minority. Quite a few writers of the period wrote treatises on proper ornamentation (which varied from French, to Italian, to German, etc). Telemann wrote a series of "Methodical Sonatas" which included the plain unornamented instrumental line, and then a version with LOTS of ornamentation-- more than a player would generally include, but designed to give students an idea of how to ornament different passages.
Got wood?
http://www.Busmanwhistles.com
Let me custom make one for you!
Post Reply