Not OT. Very seriouse whistle related something something
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
- IDAwHOa
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:04 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I play whistles. I sell whistles. This seems just a BIT excessive to the cause. A sentence or two is WAY less than 100 characters.
Re: Not OT. Very seriouse whistle related something somethi
FROMvomitbunny wrote:there was once two cats from Calkenny,
who thought there one cat too many,
they scratched and they bit,
they fought and they fit,
'till insted of two cats, there wern't any.
they fought and they fit,
TO
they fought and they SPit,
Glad I looked. I really like poems and stories where cats come out on the short end!!!!
Steven - IDAwHOa - Wood Rocks
"If you keep asking questions.... You keep getting answers." - Miss Frizzle - The Magic School Bus
"If you keep asking questions.... You keep getting answers." - Miss Frizzle - The Magic School Bus
- vomitbunny
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:34 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: spleen
From what I gather, the two cats in question were really one cat, one being a regular cat, and one being an exact duplicat of the first cat, except made from anti matter. In other words, an anti-cat.
It has to do something with Einstien's Specific theory of Relativity. (not his better known theory of General Relativity.)
In a nutshell, if the can (and anti-cat) in question were of sufficient mass, time (and space) would not only be warped around it, but actually be dragged around the cat, although most likely to a very very small degree. Thus, without being able to change the direction of a very large object indeed (such as a planet or very very large cat) one must conclude that if time travel is possible, it must follow the one-way only laws, called Terminator laws. One must conclude that Back-to-the-Future rules (two way) are theoretically impossible.
This has historically been the debate of time travel through the years. Whether we follow Back to the Future laws or Terminator laws.
Anyway, this is what I pieced together from reading the back of sugar packs at Stucky's. I think they got most of thier information from that wheelchair guy.
It has to do something with Einstien's Specific theory of Relativity. (not his better known theory of General Relativity.)
In a nutshell, if the can (and anti-cat) in question were of sufficient mass, time (and space) would not only be warped around it, but actually be dragged around the cat, although most likely to a very very small degree. Thus, without being able to change the direction of a very large object indeed (such as a planet or very very large cat) one must conclude that if time travel is possible, it must follow the one-way only laws, called Terminator laws. One must conclude that Back-to-the-Future rules (two way) are theoretically impossible.
This has historically been the debate of time travel through the years. Whether we follow Back to the Future laws or Terminator laws.
Anyway, this is what I pieced together from reading the back of sugar packs at Stucky's. I think they got most of thier information from that wheelchair guy.
My opinion is stupid and wrong.
- Bloomfield
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Location: Location:
- vomitbunny
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:34 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: spleen
- IDAwHOa
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:04 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I play whistles. I sell whistles. This seems just a BIT excessive to the cause. A sentence or two is WAY less than 100 characters.
Too complicated. As long as the cats were no longer cats and could not harm anyone anylonger for any reason in any place.vomitbunny wrote:From what I gather, the two cats in question were really one cat, one being a regular cat, and one being an exact duplicat of the first cat, except made from anti matter. In other words, an anti-cat.
It has to do something with Einstien's Specific theory of Relativity. (not his better known theory of General Relativity.)
In a nutshell, if the can (and anti-cat) in question were of sufficient mass, time (and space) would not only be warped around it, but actually be dragged around the cat, although most likely to a very very small degree. Thus, without being able to change the direction of a very large object indeed (such as a planet or very very large cat) one must conclude that if time travel is possible, it must follow the one-way only laws, called Terminator laws. One must conclude that Back-to-the-Future rules (two way) are theoretically impossible.
This has historically been the debate of time travel through the years. Whether we follow Back to the Future laws or Terminator laws.
Anyway, this is what I pieced together from reading the back of sugar packs at Stucky's. I think they got most of thier information from that wheelchair guy.
THAT is ALL that matters.
Steven - IDAwHOa - Wood Rocks
"If you keep asking questions.... You keep getting answers." - Miss Frizzle - The Magic School Bus
"If you keep asking questions.... You keep getting answers." - Miss Frizzle - The Magic School Bus
- Bloomfield
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Location: Location: Location:
Dear Em'ly, you know, I for oneemmline wrote:Geez Bloo, I'm surprised that you thoughtBloomfield wrote:So my meter is slightly askew?emmline wrote:Said Em to a whistler named Bloo,
Your meter is slightly askew.
But if, as you say,
"Em" and "damn" rhyme with "they,"
I'll give credit where credit is due.
Well, dear Em, let me ask you:
Regarding my poem
You throw the first stone
Is that something you ought to do?
That that thing was a stone, it was not.
It was merely a piffle,
A trifle, a whiffle,
So don't get your pants in a knot!
Thought it was all in good fun!
I'm relieved that no knot
Will now be my lot
For pants, I confess, I wear none.
/Bloomfield
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38239
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: England
- brewerpaul
- Posts: 7300
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: Clifton Park, NY
- Contact: