OT Subject Change to Image processing on XP?

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 611
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 6:37 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: St. Louis, MO U.S.A.

OT Subject Change to Image processing on XP?

Post by Monster »

Way back in the old millenium when I was running windows 95, I installed Photoshop to work with pohtos etc. The results were not good, lots of crashing happened everafter. In retrospect, I'm still not sure whether it was the windows 95 or a hardware problem (not enough RAM or some such) or if it was Photoshop's fault. My present computer has XP (the dumbed down version, doesn't even have MS office!) and 256 MB Ram, I'm not high-tech so I need some advice on image handling software that won't cause loads of problems. I need to work with my whistle photos you know. :wink:

XP has been stable for me so far, so I want to be careful with it!

Thanks :party:
Last edited by Monster on Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
insert uber smart comment here
User avatar
littlejohngael
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've been with Chiff and Fipple since shortly after I bought my first low D. I've learned loads from this community, and I intend to continue to learn and contribute. Many thanks to Dale and everyone who makes this site happen.
Location: In the middle of a poetic moment ...

Post by littlejohngael »

Hey Monster,

I'm running Photoshop 7.0 on my Windows XP Home Edition and haven't had a single problem. I have 256MB RAM and it does fine.

Little John
User avatar
mrosenlof
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:35 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Louisville, Colorado, USA

Post by mrosenlof »

You can try GIMP. I'm pretty sure there is a windows version. I'm happy with it under Linux. Good set of features, free.

www.gimp.org
User avatar
Zubivka
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Sol-3, .fr/bzh/mesquer

Post by Zubivka »

Are you sure you need this complicated piece of professional software?

I mean, do you need elaborate CMS, CMYK Stripping, Beziers tools...
i.e. couldn't you do the same with Photoshop elements?

Just asking--take no offense...
User avatar
mvhplank
Posts: 1061
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Gettysburg
Contact:

Post by mvhplank »

Photoshop is such a resources hog that at home I use Jasc's Paintshop Pro. It will do about everything you need, including layers and all the standard formats (tiff, gif, jpg, and so on).

It's WAY cheaper, too.

M
Marguerite
Gettysburg
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 611
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 6:37 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: St. Louis, MO U.S.A.

Post by Monster »

Zubivka wrote:Are you sure you need this complicated piece of professional software?

I mean, do you need elaborate CMS, CMYK Stripping, Beziers tools...
i.e. couldn't you do the same with Photoshop elements?

Just asking--take no offense...
Hmm, well, in 97 I thought I paid $20 for photoshop, produced by Broederbound@ or some such company. Maybe Photoshop Elements is what I had, all I know was crash, crash, crash, then reformat hard drive, and throw out Broderbound!!! Yer right I certainly do not need CMYK stripping or Beziers tools, at least I think I don't. I'm an admitted dummy in this area! :) I just want something to play around with, nothing expensive, nothing terribly complicated, the Gimp thing is FREE which is always a plus, but looking at the website I get the feeling it may be "buggy", ... Of course I could be wrong......

Oh yes, all recommendations will be looked into, thanks mvhplank, Zub, littlejohn.
insert uber smart comment here
User avatar
peeplj
Posts: 9029
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: forever in the old hills of Arkansas
Contact:

Post by peeplj »

Just wanted to post a good word for the GIMP, now in its 2.0 incarnation.

Powerful, dependable, stable software. Little bit of a learning curve, but any program that powerful also has some complexity to manage.

And you can't beat the price! :) Completely free, completely open-sourced.

--James
User avatar
vomitbunny
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:34 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: spleen

Post by vomitbunny »

I'm using Gimp on xp myself. For what few task I need it for it's more than enough.
My opinion is stupid and wrong.
User avatar
pthouron
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 12:30 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Nutley, NJ, US
Contact:

Post by pthouron »

Monster,

$20 couldn't possibly have bought you Photoshop, even in 1997. Probably a watered down version, since Elements wasn't aroubnd back then. I've been running Photoshop Elements 2.0 on a Windows 2000 PC for a year, with no problems whatsoever. And it really gives you everything a non-professional could use put of the full version.

PT
User avatar
dbcollies
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 10:20 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Hotel in Ottawa, CA. Home is Baytown, TX
Contact:

Post by dbcollies »

Monster wrote:Hmm, well, in 97 I thought I paid $20 for photoshop, produced by Broederbound@ or some such company. Maybe Photoshop Elements is what I had
Both the "Broederbund" and the $20.00 tell me that it was definitely not Photoshop, which is produced by Adobe and costs, if I remember correctly, in the vicinity of $600.00 for a full install. I have a vague memory of a graphics program by Broederbund, but I can't remember what it what called. Maybe it WAS Photoshop, but that's certainly not what's called Photoshop now.

I can personally recommend Jasc PaintShop Pro for general graphics editing. I use Gimp under Linix, but I've never tried the Windows port, so I don't know how well it runs.

It might help to know what it is you want to DO with the tool. "Work with photos" is pretty vague. Gimp, PaintShop Pro, and Photoshop let you do some pretty sophisticated things with images, but that flexibility comes at the expense of complexity, to varying degrees. There may be simpler tools if all you want to do is red-eye removal, cropping, etc.
Dwayne Bailey
Itinerant hacker and actor
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 611
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 6:37 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: St. Louis, MO U.S.A.

Post by Monster »

Sorry about that, obviously I never owned Photoshop then, but some Cheapo garbage that did me no good.

DB, I just want to use it for resizing, cropping, lighten, darken photos, first thing would be to get a suitable avatar up on C&F. It appears that MS paint is really dumbed down on my computer, it appears that everything is really dumbed down on my computer, A Compaq Presario from Best Buy... I shoulda shopped around oooohh, don't get me started!!!
insert uber smart comment here
User avatar
glauber
Posts: 4967
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: I'm from Brazil, living in the Chicago area (USA)
Contact:

Post by glauber »

Broderbund: it was probably Paint Shop. This is a program that prints birthday cards, etc. I had the Apple II version (20 years ago?).

Not to be confused with the JASC PaintShop program, which is like an easier to use Photoshop, very good.

I'd try The Gimp, too, if for nothing else, because it's free. And a lot of the leading edge computer artists use it.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!
--Wellsprings--
User avatar
Zubivka
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Sol-3, .fr/bzh/mesquer

Post by Zubivka »

pthouron wrote:Monster,

$20 couldn't possibly have bought you Photoshop, even in 1997. Probably a watered down version, since Elements wasn't aroubnd back then. I've been running Photoshop Elements 2.0 on a Windows 2000 PC for a year, with no problems whatsoever. And it really gives you everything a non-professional could use put of the full version.

PT
Broderbund, 97? Could it have been the early PhotoDeluxe ("onions, no ketchup, thanks")? This sucked, with a moron more than "human" interface... Oh, Glauber beat me by quoting the right software, more "paint" than photo.

Photoshop Elements is way better. I'll second Patrick on the fact it's all most needs in Photoshop (bar the pre-press specialties I quoted above).
It's bundled with quite a few mid-range cameras, printers and scanners, so chances are you know a pro photographer or graphist who already has the full "pro" Photoshop and will just GIVE you a license of Ph. Elements, complete with the original CD's.

Else, GIMP is very good, and just plainly and completely free to download. However it lacks all the trick FX "plug-ins" that Photoshop home users seem to enjoy.

Finally, if you're serious about photography, you can use Elements and at the same time learn Photoshop, which interface is identical. If really needed you can always "upgrade" later to the full ink-and-paper-geeks version.
User avatar
glauber
Posts: 4967
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: I'm from Brazil, living in the Chicago area (USA)
Contact:

Post by glauber »

I'm sorry, i think the soft i was thinking of is called Print Shop. It still exists, by the way. It was pretty cool for the time (Apple II), but not an image editing program.

Doesn't the name Brotherbund sound like some evil South African secret society? :)

Brotherbund is pretty well known for spyware, by the way. Mostly stuff that "phones home" that gets installed when you install one of their games. Ad-aware treats them as low risk, so they probably aren't doing a whole lot. But i clean them up regularly from my home computer.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!
--Wellsprings--
User avatar
Zubivka
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Sol-3, .fr/bzh/mesquer

Post by Zubivka »

glauber wrote:Doesn't the name Brotherbund sound like some evil South African secret society? :)
Brothelbund? Nah, they publish BoerShop XX
Post Reply