Brilliant, perhaps, but probably false, IMO.apossibleworld wrote:this is a brilliant sentence.benhall.1 quoting JEM wrote: if you have no flute, then there will be no quirks and limitations.
and certainly not untrue.
Life is full of quirks and limitations--even if one has no flute.
If the sentence were true I would stick to the kazoo and be
done with limitations in my life.
This is a job for First Order Predicate Logic.
Jem wrote:
'No simple system flute, however well designed and made and suited to the player is not still going to have some quirks and limitations.'
This can be expressed as follows:
For every x, if x is a flooter, it is not the case that [there exists a y such that y is a simple system flute well designed to be suited to x's way of playing flute and y has no playing quirks and limitations for x].
There, that buggers things up nicely. (See my 'Critique of Pure Drool,' forthcoming, for a good deal more of this.)
As to whether it's true, I don't know, but it seems true--given my experience, anyhow.