OT: What's Your Zodiac (Sun) Sign? Theory to be tested
- burnsbyrne
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- littlejohngael
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've been with Chiff and Fipple since shortly after I bought my first low D. I've learned loads from this community, and I intend to continue to learn and contribute. Many thanks to Dale and everyone who makes this site happen.
- Location: In the middle of a poetic moment ...
WHEW! I was afraid I was the only one! Add June 26th to the list, but tag me as Year of the Dog.On 2003-02-25 14:26, markv wrote:
Just to add another data point for Martin, June 23, the crabby one
Year of the Boar
Mark V.
I'm described by friends as an extremely extroverted introvert with an intense fear of success, so I'm scared to death to play in public, but do so to overcome my fears. ...
- HDSarah
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: 64.9 deg N, 147.6 deg W
- Contact:
As I remember from astronomy class a couple decades ago, the Zodiac signs are out of sync now. So, if your sign is, for example, Leo, the sun wasn't really IN Leo when you were born (assuming you aren't a couple thousand years old).On 2003-02-25 12:52, Chuck_Clark wrote:
And, FWIW, I agree with Thurlowe. The notion that the positions of several stars billins of miles away and of a couple of planets millions of miles away at the time of one's birth could somehow control that person's entire life is the oldest, most cherished and absolutely most ludicrous of humanity's various superstitions. I've yet to meet an astrologer that could even balance his/her checkbook, yet they claim to be able to make complex calculations based on a bunch of stars whose light left them thousands of years before the date of the sucker's birth. :roll:
So, I agree that this is bunk, but I think it's harmless bunk, and I'm all for humoring Englishmen.
Oct.2, Libra. I play in public at open sessions twice a week, but if you called it a "performance" I'd have a much harder time doing it. I don't like it when the coffeehouse patrons clap after a tune -- I'd rather forget that anyone else is listening. I don't know what animal (Chinese year) my year was, but it should have been the chicken!
Sarah
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HDSarah on 2003-02-25 15:50 ]</font>
- herbivore12
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: California
Capricorn, cusp Aquarius (this I know from Google, that all-powerful fount of knowledge). But, yep, I think it's bunk. People make the same sorts of claims for numerology, phrenology, palm reading, and on and on, and each of these is held as absolutely infallible by some adherents.
A couple interesting things:
1. In his excellent book "Unweaving the Rainbow", Richard Dawkins makes a number of good arguments in one chapter for the invalidity of astrological thinking, but also makes an interesting observation: that astrologers make comments that would never be tolerated if they were in a different form. For instance, that people born under one particular Zodiac sign should not date people of another given sign; imagine if someone were to say, for example, "Irish should never date Chinese." Uninformed bigotry in any form should be discouraged.
2. When I was in college, a professor had each student provide their birth date, time, place, and so on and "sent the info out to an astrologer for individual readings." A couple weeks later, we each got our readings and read them in class, and people were amazed at how accurate they were, even in fairly specific instances. Then the prof had everybody hand their chart to the person behind them, and the amazed gasps turned to groans as everyone realized that the readings were all identical -- each student had the exact same text -- and we had a little discussion about statistics, knowing your probable audience, etc. Very similar to the "cold reading" technique used by magicians and "psychics" to produce seemingly amazing predictions. It was a good object lesson. . .
A couple interesting things:
1. In his excellent book "Unweaving the Rainbow", Richard Dawkins makes a number of good arguments in one chapter for the invalidity of astrological thinking, but also makes an interesting observation: that astrologers make comments that would never be tolerated if they were in a different form. For instance, that people born under one particular Zodiac sign should not date people of another given sign; imagine if someone were to say, for example, "Irish should never date Chinese." Uninformed bigotry in any form should be discouraged.
2. When I was in college, a professor had each student provide their birth date, time, place, and so on and "sent the info out to an astrologer for individual readings." A couple weeks later, we each got our readings and read them in class, and people were amazed at how accurate they were, even in fairly specific instances. Then the prof had everybody hand their chart to the person behind them, and the amazed gasps turned to groans as everyone realized that the readings were all identical -- each student had the exact same text -- and we had a little discussion about statistics, knowing your probable audience, etc. Very similar to the "cold reading" technique used by magicians and "psychics" to produce seemingly amazing predictions. It was a good object lesson. . .
- Redwolf
- Posts: 6051
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: Somewhere in the Western Hemisphere
Thank goodness, another Gemini! We (myself and I, that is) were beginning to get a bit lonely!On 2003-02-25 16:36, Snuh wrote:
June 4, 1983. Makes me a Gemini I guess.
Redwolf
P.S. I don't buy into astrology either. My stock answer in the '70s, when everybody was into asking "what's your sign" was (depending on my mood) "Stop," "Yield" or "Tow-Away Zone"
- Pat Cannady
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: Chicago
- Nanohedron
- Moderatorer
- Posts: 38238
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.
Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps. - Location: Lefse country